Post B7atQRqGoElmYOXAH2 by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
 (DIR) More posts by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
 (DIR) Post #B7RMSoZVcezVo8hEAq by elle@weathered-steel.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rustfoundation fucking **BOO**not surprising, immensely disappointing. why do these cancers on society continue to infect everything good in the world? tying the Rust Foundation to some of the biggest technofascists in the world was already disgusting enough with Amazon, Google, and Microsoft.this bubble cannot burst soon enough.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7RMTJjrkChATEmR7Y by rustfoundation@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       [NEWS] OpenAI has joined the Rust Foundation as a Platinum Member and committed additional funding to programs and goals across the Rust ecosystem. Sustaining and strengthening a language like Rust requires this kind of support, and we are grateful to OpenAI for stepping up! šŸŽ‰https://rustfoundation.org/media/rust-foundation-welcomes-openai-as-platinum-member-announces-donation-to-rust-project/ #rustlang #openai
       
 (DIR) Post #B7RMTK0siwJ3K0k1dw by ainmosni@ainmosni.eu
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rustfoundation This is rather gross tbh, this erodes my trust in rust and its foundation...Sure, the money is nice, but it's wise to consider where the money is coming from... And in this case, the money is coming from one of the biggest destructive forces in our industry, the ethical choice would be to say no. See also python saying no to US government money.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7RMZScFeTzJjx9EeG by SarraceniaWilds@sunny.garden
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rustfoundation ew
       
 (DIR) Post #B7ZhgKTaZO7RjalsmW by bunbury@famichiki.jp
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rustfoundation An unethical company responsible for filling the web with slop and in code red mode bleeding billions? Something smells off.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7ZhgKgLnwKMNAk4fo by rl_dane@polymaths.social
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @bunbury @rustfoundationHate to be a hater, but seems on-brand for that community. šŸ˜“#RustIsGoingGreat(And I'm not even one of those C-is-sacred types, ok?)
       
 (DIR) Post #B7ZhmFhRF4GKep4coy by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rl_dane @bunbury @rustfoundation oh, but this just confirms what I’ve been laughed out about for telling for months: that Rust is killing FOSS.I just wasn’t expecting them to do that by going all-in on ā€œAIā€ slop.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7ZhsV6esBNuB6qjMO by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rl_dane @bunbury that post also proves that @rustfoundation doesn’t interact even on the Mastodon part of the Fediverse. Otherwise, they’d have realised the utter tonedeafness of their announcement wording.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7atQRZFpV9thcZZke by rl_dane@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mirabilos @bunbury @rustfoundationoh, but this just confirms what I’ve been laughed out about for telling for months: that Rust is killing FOSS.More so than LLMs, CLAs, IBM/RH shenanigans? What is it about Rust, other than limiting the architecture targets and the hardware demands for compilation?
       
 (DIR) Post #B7atQRqGoElmYOXAH2 by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bunbury @rustfoundation @rl_dane their active bullying of C programmers for one (not an exhaustive list)
       
 (DIR) Post #B7atU8xcx3ir9Wjm2C by kabel42@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rl_dane @mirabilos @bunbury @rustfoundation I get not wanting to use rust now, but whats the logic behind more open source software being bad for open source? You have the option to not use it. It's not systemd
       
 (DIR) Post #B7atU9BS7emVqPCoaG by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rustfoundation @kabel42 @bunbury @rl_dane wrong
       
 (DIR) Post #B7atXZVIimcoLM7exE by rl_dane@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @kabel42 @mirabilos @bunbury @rustfoundationI can't speak for mirabilos' reasonings, but just because something is open source does not mean it's good for open source.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7athFzA931Mhihyng by kabel42@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mirabilos @rustfoundation @bunbury @rl_dane rust is systemd?
       
 (DIR) Post #B7athGE3FgvlRtfs0W by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kabel42 @rl_dane not that one
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b0Tw5LWPR2toCCWm by rl_dane@polymaths.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kabel42 @mirabilos @rustfoundation @bunburyI mean, the "choice" argument is always murky waters, right?Do you have a choice to use nim or not? Yeah, because nothing essential is using it, and AFAIK they don't have a cult-like community hard-promoting it everywhere.But rust? Once it's in the Linux kernel, you don't have much of a choice.Please understand, I have no major qualms against the language itself. But I do tend to look at the community somewhat chab-chab (Persian, literally "left-left," or "askance.")
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b0TwGKrYE3RtKyem by kabel42@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rl_dane @mirabilos @rustfoundation @bunburyBut why would it be my choice what the linux kernel is implemented in? If the devs want to use rust that's their choice. I have done nothing to entitle me to influence that choice.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b0TwS2A3aE2AoJtI by rl_dane@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kabel42 @mirabilos @rustfoundation @bunburyFair, but it still means that you're obligated to use it, just as you're obligated to use C and C++ for a bunch of things.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b0TwcJXpo4Y3cWum by kabel42@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rl_dane @mirabilosIf I want to use Linux and there are not enough people interested in maintaining a fork without rust.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b0TwlsyFSl1k6Apk by rl_dane@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kabel42 @mirabilosRight, that's why the "choice" argument is always iffy.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b0TwvSOf7RVQZoki by kabel42@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rl_dane @mirabilos But telling someone how they have to spend their time also feels wrong. I remember arguments that gnome and KDE should make one desktop instead of splitting resources among 2 and I don't think you would get more out of that. If you prohibit rust from the kernel i would expect that you just get fewer contributions, not more in C.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b0Tx8ZbtbwA6iICG by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kabel42 @rl_dane that’s a slippery slope.What if people want to program in…Lua (this has precedent in NetBSD)Swift (this has precedent in Darwin)mkshPHPPerlPython3Java (this has precedent in Solaris)…… in the Linux kernel? By your argumentation, you have to accommodate all of them.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b2RzVY1dZaqLeTQm by kabel42@polymaths.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mirabilos @rl_daneNO!That's the point. You don't have to anything. If they offer a path that implements some cool feature and the kernel maintainers think that it's worth adding another language for that than they can decide to merge that. But being the ones that maintain everything, they have to decide if they want to, not I.If you want to maintain a fork of the kernel with most code written in c pre processor, that's you choice and no one should keep you from that.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7b2RzncwQ2DkQ6ubw by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kabel42 @rl_dane but[i]f you prohibitall these languages I listed abovefrom the kernel i would expect that you just get fewer contributions, not more in Cor rust