Post B7KJEQhttVI5lmLopc by Jes@labyrinth.zone
 (DIR) More posts by Jes@labyrinth.zone
 (DIR) Post #B7KJC98EGfyegJZq9g by neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       RE: https://infosec.exchange/@ifin/116732602137426733Ad blocking is a security measure, given the failure of ad platforms to keep malicious actors out. Like any defense, it works best in layers - consider adding this on the DNS level as well.If that sounds daunting? It's not, especially with off-the-shelf services like NextDNS*, which also have a good amount of adaptability.(*I have no connections to NextDNS other than as a happy customer.)RT: https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/115741367687413652/statuses/116732602137426733
       
 (DIR) Post #B7KJCLBVSJjG3xCcvg by neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I'd be remiss if I didn't mention this - NextDNS also makes @pgl 's blocklist available, and I highly recommend it. He's constantly working on more resources and services to protect folks, and you should pay keen attention to anything he's doin'!
       
 (DIR) Post #B7KJEQhttVI5lmLopc by Jes@labyrinth.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neurovagrant Google removing the ability to use ad blockers on chrome is a security vulnerability in itself. Should start thinking, if they're actively trying to put users at risk via removing ad blockers then maybe they should be removed from systems.