Post B6w90gBGs6ym9638mO by quincy@chaos.social
(DIR) More posts by quincy@chaos.social
(DIR) Post #B6w90fhUep9yek7MMi by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
Is it possible to be "too against" big tech nuking society? I don't think so.
(DIR) Post #B6w90gBGs6ym9638mO by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
cause that's what they've been doing
(DIR) Post #B6w90gGEZewuOUN6W0 by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
"weapons of math destruction" were aptly named by Cathy O'Neil.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapons_of_Math_Destruction
(DIR) Post #B6w90groJx0UH1x75M by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
And the "AI" hype is the latest evil outgrowth of this.
(DIR) Post #B6w90hJ6gSqDdgiudE by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
There's no way one can be "too much" against this.
(DIR) Post #B6w90hmWv4NR6wUPUe by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
People worry too much about "progress" being lost or something if one doesn't show "nuance".But this isn't progress. And any worthwhile advances that are compatible with ethics will still be there to be explored at leisure in the aftermath of the fall of big tech, I promise.
(DIR) Post #B6w90iXK75o7S4NmQi by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
So let's keep calm and undermine the oligarchy first, before worrying about the (comparatively minuscule and often also questionable) "benefits" "AI" bestows upon us, shall we?If they're really that good (all things considered), they'll still be there. If not, good riddance.
(DIR) Post #B6w90j9xnQiRNuSdeq by quincy@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
"but it's getting better", they say ... ignoring the costs and large-scale destruction caused by the wrongheaded quest to remove the people from something we already had: marketable results.they're literally trying to solve the problem "people" at all cost. nothing else.don't be fooled.