Post B6pZo5kPqCl8KazVTc by aholtzma@mstdn.ca
(DIR) More posts by aholtzma@mstdn.ca
(DIR) Post #B6pUqEXhc4QcPtFLDk by coral@empty.cafe
0 likes, 0 repeats
yayyyyy vivado will resume providing no-upfront-cost part-limited spyware to program the chips they sell
(DIR) Post #B6pUqEigxDDcxyO7Lk by dlharmon@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@coral 2025.2.1 forever.Things had been headed in the right direction for a while with the removal of the WebTalk spyware, license file requirement for standard. Then this. The Linux thing was the least of my issues with it.
(DIR) Post #B6pUqExE5AqRh3Bj0K by mxsparks@social.treehouse.systems
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dlharmon @coral they’re taking out IBERT and System ILA from the gratis version too, yikes
(DIR) Post #B6pUqF9dL2lmJWzdLM by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mxsparks @dlharmon @coral that doesn't hurt nearly as much as limiting regular ila to one instance with five probes
(DIR) Post #B6pV2A388zfVxMdNJ2 by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mxsparks @dlharmon @coral I don't see ever using a version newer than 2025.x
(DIR) Post #B6pVLh2Hj3XzlQYIcK by mxsparks@social.treehouse.systems
0 likes, 0 repeats
@azonenberg @dlharmon @coral five probes?!?!???!
(DIR) Post #B6pVLhFOwI2UQ6gm3s by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mxsparks @dlharmon @coral and the simulator caps max design size like the ISE one used to
(DIR) Post #B6pVXo9L6QQBImd2NU by dlharmon@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@azonenberg @mxsparks @coral I've already told one client that if they ever want to use parts beyond 2025.2.1, they will need to provide a sufficient number of Enterprise licenses. That $20k or so will be factored into selecting a part.I suspect they will make millions on license sales at the expense in billions in FPGA sales in the long term. Even though I don't personally buy enough to matter, there's about US $1M per year in Xilinx sales due to parts I selected for clients.
(DIR) Post #B6pVZ4pCaeFnJCoZSS by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mxsparks @dlharmon @coral also if I'm reading the docs right it's a one year free license requiring renewal to keep using the tool so they can rugpull in 2027
(DIR) Post #B6pVe9ZUMzqtTgsyCO by dlharmon@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@azonenberg @mxsparks @coral Exactly. This is my biggest issue. I expect to be supporting Ultrascale+ past the 2045 EOL, likely to my retirement.
(DIR) Post #B6pVkj4PIdPrJRTuOe by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dlharmon @mxsparks @coral yep i definitely intend to direct clients anywhere other than xilinx in response to this
(DIR) Post #B6pZo5kPqCl8KazVTc by aholtzma@mstdn.ca
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dlharmon @azonenberg @mxsparks @coral it is probably something extremely stupid like each director level being responsible for their own p&l and the tools division only makes money one way.
(DIR) Post #B6pZo5xt27XD0NIGTQ by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@aholtzma @dlharmon @mxsparks @coral Tools exist to sell silicon. Nobody buys silicon without tools to go with it.Honestly, I think FPGA toolchains should be fully uncapped and free, even for the largest devices. Offer paid support contracts for large volume industrial users who want a dedicated FAE etc, sure. But the point of the toolchain is to sell silicon and the less friction you put in that path, the better.
(DIR) Post #B6pcixYn9ccjLvnZFg by aholtzma@mstdn.ca
0 likes, 0 repeats
@azonenberg @dlharmon @mxsparks @coral this is what I tell Xilinx every time I see them. I also slap them around a bit over the lack of Linux ARM64 binaries. Everyone should do this.
(DIR) Post #B6pciy1VQrammzEV0a by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@aholtzma @dlharmon @mxsparks @coral I suspect there are third party x86-only components that they don't have source to.