Post B6nUk5qkdBczP2JC4m by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
 (DIR) More posts by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
 (DIR) Post #B6mqewzq7kquKWYKDQ by eloy@hsnl.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       top international standards, like the legal bare minimum RoHS and CE
       
 (DIR) Post #B6mqexDJJfcz0Ir5DE by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @eloy > ISOLIES."ISO does not perform certification" https://www.iso.org/certification.html
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nURLquuRJvX3Rv0a by lnl@screaminginsi.de
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lanodan @eloy it's probably certification to some ISO standard like  ISO/IEC 27001. Who would care about such a detail like which one, right? /hj
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nURM4k52NaDvuxYe by xarvos@outerheaven.club
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       my system got certificated for conforming to ISO 8601@lnl @lanodan @eloy
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nUk5qkdBczP2JC4m by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xarvos @eloy @lnl Incidentally this is one where I really wish some ISO standards would be open-access.
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nV2NSVtq2jEFgqjg by icedquinn@blob.cat
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xarvos @eloy @lanodan @lnl hey i wrote a module for that :comfypeek:
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nWJ7IjKL13zeeyHI by lnl@screaminginsi.de
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lanodan @eloy @xarvos Wikipedia is for free https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nWJ7ei0cb55owWXI by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lnl @eloy @xarvos Yeah, although having got old copies of ISO 8601 at some point, IIRC there's more than what wikipedia puts.Which you'd probably want for a date parser, where then to make sense of it you'd probably need access to the standard.
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nWj38NRUBEbCBPO4 by domi@donotsta.re
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lanodan @eloy @xarvos @lnl i wanted to snarkily respond “i prefer the RFC over ISO8601”… in other news i was today years old when I learnt there are three RFCs pertaining to (essentially) the same timestamp format
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nXEEVFDu1ipskStk by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @domi @eloy @xarvos @lnl I'm counting two, RFC3339 which is a profile of it, plus RFC9557 which extends on it.Are you counting RFC2822? Because that one isn't ISO like at all, it's the one used in email/HTTP headers and just happens to have an RFC3339-like timezone offset.
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nYH9cVvwQUW06bXU by domi@donotsta.re
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lanodan @eloy @xarvos @lnl yeah i did count 2822. i only glanced over it tho
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nYPlvROorLdL4GB6 by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @domi @eloy @xarvos @lnl And well on my side I guess it helps to have implemented a date parser. ^^
       
 (DIR) Post #B6naTpMujv3BNXyni4 by lnl@screaminginsi.de
       2 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lanodan @domi @eloy @xarvos don't forget RFC1945 which already mentions 4 more RFCs for comparison!
       
 (DIR) Post #B6nauySn28l9P8fl1k by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lnl @domi @eloy @xarvos There's a ton of datetime RFCs (I once did few greps in my mirror), but context is ISO8601. ^^