Post B6bWjHXp3S1M22vTpQ by natty@astolfo.social
 (DIR) More posts by natty@astolfo.social
 (DIR) Post #B6bWVv0XXDPmN2zCzo by alexia@starlightnet.work
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       the guy making the rounds rn as far as I'm aware isn't involved in the project at all and exclusively speaks LLMFor the record, having checked the day 2 livestream, it seems the reason there's a planned systemd dependency is for having systemd enforce the sandbox. Also mounting systemd services into sandboxes for...some reason? Also "centralized identity and permission storage"...is Flatpak's interface not centralized enough? All using a daemon they'll develop called "systemd-appd" Why didn't they just, idk, make that daemon separate from systemd, or use Syd or something? idk!Oh, right, depending on upstream Systemd also introduces more moving parts into Flatpak that will hinder adoption of any and all of these improvements on slower-moving distros, even if they were to package hypothetical flatpak-next.overall idk how thought-out this actually is
       
 (DIR) Post #B6bWjHXp3S1M22vTpQ by natty@astolfo.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @alexia@starlightnet.work yeah maybe we're just arguing with a bot