Post B6aM5YQffJ7u7F2TCa by jaythvv@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) More posts by jaythvv@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) Post #B6aM5YQffJ7u7F2TCa by jaythvv@infosec.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       LOLThe reports may throw cold water on the bets tech’s biggest firms have placed on the technology. While some cling to the promise of an AI “renaissance” or “revolution,” the cost of adoption is proving a stubborn bottleneck. These developments also suggest that the economics of replacing or augmenting human labor with AI may be more complicated than some early forecasts originally implied. That echoes what Bryan Catanzaro, vice president of applied deep learning at Nvidia, recently said in an interview with Axios. “For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees,” he said.https://fortune.com/2026/05/22/microsoft-ai-cost-problem-tokens-agents/
       
 (DIR) Post #B6aM5Ye8rDtyn1LECO by kevinrns@mstdn.social
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @jaythvv 👍 "The cost of compute is higher than the cost of employees."And the water taken from communities, and power price spikes. And carbon burning. What a human hating collection of cluster redaction.
       
 (DIR) Post #B6aM5YunrHEHch8XAW by jaythvv@infosec.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       MS puling back on Claude for cost when it needs AI adoption by everybody else to justify investments is just icing on the cake