Post B6Vf4oslvxLmC4kLSK by xkcd@mastodon.xyz
(DIR) More posts by xkcd@mastodon.xyz
(DIR) Post #B6Vf4oslvxLmC4kLSK by xkcd@mastodon.xyz
0 likes, 0 repeats
They rounded down to 182.8 instead of rounding up to 182.9 because 182.9 might make the statement incorrect.https://xkcd.com/3248/
(DIR) Post #B6VhOVPOFMQ3UqWB2O by kunde_x@social.tchncs.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
@xkcd The rounding does not meet the European standard. Here it is rounded to 182.9. So in Europe the statement would definetely be correct by definition ðŸ¤See last table: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1980/181/2020-06-13
(DIR) Post #B6VkqyI2l8O52eLZAm by Drahreg01@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@xkcd In Nuclear Medicine we use for instance 111 MBq, 148 MBq or 185 MBq. But why? Because it's 3, 4 or 5 mCi. (The unit Curie is deprecated for more than 40 years!)
(DIR) Post #B6zu4xa5900gYSsVoO by cyclotopie@mastodon.gougere.fr
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Lubedyle Tu fais ton rattrappage des #xkcd en retard ?Je préfère ce bot-ci, @xkcdbot : il met un #altText et le lien vers explainxkcd.https://indieweb.social/@xkcdbot/116610570799351192