Post B6UCVIXlBYm5t1ERhg by emilymbender@dair-community.social
 (DIR) More posts by emilymbender@dair-community.social
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVFVWTQCcTDA7Ie by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/19/google-search-as-you-know-it-is-over/A short thread🧵>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVGMhHijl882aBM by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       5 years ago (2021) Google researchers Metzler et al put out a preprint talking about how LLMs would change information access ("Rethinking Search"). It was full of TERRIBLE ideas, and Chirag Shah and I wrote a reply ("Situating Search"):https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3498366.3505816>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVGrXR3PIfmTDFo by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       We followed a couple of years later with further arguments about, inter alia, protecting the information ecosystem:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649468While Nora Lindemann was writing about similar ideas:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-024-01944-w>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVHJXkvoC4dZZuC by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       But all the academic papers in the world showing why something is a bad idea won't stop companies from doing it, if it's profitable and/or fits into their quasi-religious beliefs that "AI" is the future, alas.So let's look at what Google is up to now, or at least says they are, via TechCrunch as stenographer:>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVHiMGferJbBOaG by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Not satisfied to cut people off from the important sense-making of looking at information in its context and finding and navigating different perspectives (what "AI overviews" do), Google also wants to tell you what to search for:>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVI7Wl5n6ZexUoa by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       How infantilizing --- you thought you were looking to find something that someone else wrote on the web. But woah! Now you've been "dropped into" an "interactive experience". Yeah, Google can just fuck right off with that.>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVIXlBYm5t1ERhg by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Look, I hate pointy-clicky interfaces as much as the next Gen-Xer (let me use the keyboard, dammit) but it is so weird to reduce the important, and importantly effortful, work of navigating the information ecosystem to the apparent drudgery of clicking on links that are (*shudder*) blue!!!>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVJ1XOqatNNAE7M by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Here is where it really starts to show that this journalist is just lightly paraphrasing a press release. "Links will become an afterthought," will they? What is your evidence for that confident statement about the future?>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVJUxdS86qcviym by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Spot the magical thinking here. No, the "AI" isn't making sense of anything. It's making papier-mache of the input, and preventing the use from doing the sense-making.Also, is that the Pokemon sense of "evolution"?>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVJz5pQEUM51mwi by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       To expand just a little bit: the point of a Google Alert was to gain access to things that people were saying about a topic that you were tracking, which you otherwise might not turn up. And every (blue, even!) link that you clicked on brought you to a web page you could examine to get a sense of who was writing, in what context, and why.>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVKPgEZV3gXT1O4 by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       More stenography here. Google starting shoving the "AI Overviews" into query results as an opt-out situation. That is, you have to take action to have them not pop up. I don't doubt they are *shown to* 2.5 billion monthly users, but that doesn't mean they are used by as many or desired by them.>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVKoqizdIwbF7cO by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The comparsion to ChatGPT in the above screencap also really shows the PR origins of this piece. Google is clearly very very concerned about losing their advantage in this market to OpenAI.>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVLGV4BkcKMBCiW by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       NO NO NO NO NO! Flashy polished looking webpages that no one has accountability for run absolutely counter to the common good when it comes to a health information ecosystem AND an informed public.(Also, "Antigravity"? Yeah, you want us to think this is very cool science fiction and/or magic. Not buying it.)>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVLkzEq8ZquRYEi by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       For one final shudder: Pichai here seems to want to think this is helping the world somehow? Gah.>>
       
 (DIR) Post #B6UCVME3UlODJ42lXs by emilymbender@dair-community.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       We don't have to buy this journalist's view of the future as already written by Google. Every time you click through to look at the actual source page you are helping to maintain our information ecosystem and build a better world./fin (for now)