Post B6SAAftQaaPzzvU9bc by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
 (DIR) More posts by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
 (DIR) Post #B6RfVLA9lGmfCrgTuy by swirly@donotsta.re
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       amazing. supertux offers glibc appimage but not a musl appimage… this is why i was hesitant about alpine dangitalso no i wont use flatpak im already using it for one app and its taking up so much fucking space
       
 (DIR) Post #B6RfVLW8RYMgJ1y2Ay by domi@donotsta.re
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @swirly there’s no such thing as a ‘musl appimage’supertux is literally in the repos tho, wyd
       
 (DIR) Post #B6SAAftQaaPzzvU9bc by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @domi @swirly the package isn't updated to supertux 0.7 yet, which doesn't build on musl because it depends on the glibc-specific execinfo.h. there's an implementation of that that works on musl (libexecinfo), but it's not packaged yet either
       
 (DIR) Post #B6SAAg5pqSLKcPI3we by domi@donotsta.re
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @noisytoot @swirly execinfo sucks, i wonder why it’s even needed
       
 (DIR) Post #B6SAZVzMYACsWI6df6 by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @domi @swirly I think it's just for backtraces and they didn't know that musl doesn't have it so the build system doesn't check for it and just assumes that it exists
       
 (DIR) Post #B6SAZWG1YDXBLxtwdE by domi@donotsta.re
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @noisytoot @swirly my hot take for today is that we shouldn’t include platform-specific garbage for backtraces in prod builds