Post B6QH58fX006es0NB9U by stux@mstdn.social
 (DIR) More posts by stux@mstdn.social
 (DIR) Post #B6QH58UtdXbEL1OgZk by failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       RE: https://mstdn.social/@stux/116595257387258719I'm sorry, but this is typical of the childish nature of politics on mastodon1st of all, why do you think a "ban" would be enforceable or successful ?2nd, why ban and not blind trust ?3rd, there are *lots of way a corrupt politician can make money without insider trading, so is there a more general solution ?I'm sure that if anyone spent a few minutes on google, all of my points are addressed by some thoughtful person who has written about how to reduce corruption in the US congressRT: https://mstdn.social/users/stux/statuses/116595257387258719
       
 (DIR) Post #B6QH58fX006es0NB9U by stux@mstdn.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @failedLyndonLaRouchite Childish? lolIt’s this typical enabling that makes it possible for them to rake in so much I’d rather call it ‘necessary’
       
 (DIR) Post #B6uG6lPycjMFUNrArw by falcennial@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @stux of course eliminating corruption is necessary. you raised the need to improve society somewhat.the account who calls itself "failed" has attacked you for doing so and argued that corruption should not be addressed because corruption exists. which does not make sense. its profile makes two claims: that it is of an "upper social class" and that "social class matters".that is not a serious account with any contribution to make. it will make its way onto a block list and finish there.