Post B67VXrTRiPzRIH4VRA by stux@mstdn.social
(DIR) More posts by stux@mstdn.social
(DIR) Post #B67V58jqRnruRO2xEW by stux@mstdn.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
Oof.. it's coming all together in a somewhat dark way isn't itThe new "age of AI", more global conflicts and re-arming of states around the globe Skynet would be proud..
(DIR) Post #B67VG5UOrrxpY72hvc by sortius@infosec.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux take solace in this:Random person at the pub was very anti-AI despite their use of it at work.Not everyone who is using it is on-board with it.Most of the people I meet have zero interaction with it, purely because they live in the real world economy.It's like there's a lot of money going into a system that only a few people actually use
(DIR) Post #B67VXrTRiPzRIH4VRA by stux@mstdn.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sortius true, and I have a feeling most people hate itBut if the military is using more and by default, things get even more scary real fast
(DIR) Post #B67ViMvdceLzkEGiGG by sortius@infosec.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux yes, it will, but also, it will get real weird.The problem with injecting a fake-sentience into military stuff is it tends to cause conflicts.Sure, some will be cool with it, but the same way the general public is against AI, so are the flesh and bones in the military.Expect mutinies
(DIR) Post #B67WGDrdpXLVTfXewi by Owen_G_Richards@writing.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux Skynet was never the problem - humanity was (and is).
(DIR) Post #B67d4RfjMmKOVRImnY by peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux In would argue against such read.Situation is very tedious, tiresome, tragic, tiresome and dangerous.However people push back, not everything is big as they say, and I would argue no one wants any wars, no one wants any AI dominated world.Yes, elections sometimes brings bad consequences, yes, billionares have all the money.But we still have agency and we can keep pushing.I am not saying there is a win nearby, but I don't feel like giving up.