Post B655G4sY9S3cX0klmq by domi@donotsta.re
(DIR) More posts by domi@donotsta.re
(DIR) Post #B654EN0RgRLuDe4IhE by famfo@frogs.lgbt
0 likes, 1 repeats
My copy of @PowerDNS didn't come boxed /o\
(DIR) Post #B654FIH4lHWVpjHt20 by domi@donotsta.re
0 likes, 0 repeats
@famfo @PowerDNS what’s the source on this image lmao
(DIR) Post #B654Ja4WX5XGBpScOe by domi@donotsta.re
0 likes, 0 repeats
@famfo @PowerDNS found it now
(DIR) Post #B654yrqXLvSFBmbb0q by jn@boopsnoot.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
@famfo @PowerDNS please, where can i get the powerdns chip, i need to talk to its bootloader
(DIR) Post #B654ys2ad75znAFDnc by domi@donotsta.re
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jn @famfo @PowerDNS i hope it’s big endian…
(DIR) Post #B655EKmo2NI7HvEeq8 by jn@boopsnoot.de
1 likes, 0 repeats
@domi @PowerDNS @famfo Power-ful
(DIR) Post #B655G4sY9S3cX0klmq by domi@donotsta.re
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jn @PowerDNS @famfo “powerdns? so wait do i need a contract with IBM, or-“
(DIR) Post #B65CE3sFcEoAVzbDEW by domi@donotsta.re
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jn @PowerDNS @famfo okay but i can’t get over how funny those three packages are. we didn’t saturate 8 cores with pdns during that 1Gbps DoS. one has to imagine a 10 or 40Gbps link saturated with DNS, but i think the linux kernel will literally fail first… even if it fares better on BSD, i kinda wanna see an auth deployment which needs 24 cores just for DNS :D
(DIR) Post #B65D1Dc0COsYuFRH4i by jn@boopsnoot.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
@domi @PowerDNS @famfo at that point, i'm almost sure you're better off with two or three 8-core machines and a replication setup, because you get full redundancy in case of reboot or failure
(DIR) Post #B65D1DmzXXfZSKa3Ci by domi@donotsta.re
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jn @PowerDNS @famfo in general DNS benefits highly from lots of small, distributed machines. there are some caveats, but yeah, agreed ^^