Post B5uoZmjtf7JnGLuzBI by firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #B5sz7MmvGUY1qd46K0 by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       152.0a1 (2026-05-02)CC @firefoxwebdevs
       
 (DIR) Post #B5t0zNheBBHaHEuxEm by phnt@fluffytail.org
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage Mastosoc and it's consequences have been a disaster for the Fediverse. They likely won't see your mention because it's stuck in a separate notification class.Screenshot_2026-05-02-14-26-31-22_2ee41f386276cb67fc25e675f8c13b4d.jpg
       
 (DIR) Post #B5t0zNthSMvKscYa1Y by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @phnt No they see me, we chatted in the past.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5t17C5pEGCuaNx67U by Ree@shitposter.world
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @phnt @mangeurdenuage >harassment What kind
       
 (DIR) Post #B5t17V2GnheXKrR1iS by phnt@fluffytail.org
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Ree @mangeurdenuage a nigga/tranny post probably escaped containment.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5uk4E4U6hoywrFBLc by firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage is this error reproducible? Can you create a demo?
       
 (DIR) Post #B5uk4EIJHIsddjiDtg by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @firefoxwebdevs Of course.Here's a recording in a new vanilla profile.I've Been using Trisquel's 148.0.2 in the meantime for fedi.FF 150.0.1 works well tooIt started a few weeks ago and have used the "report a broken site" function, it was fixed at some point but then started again to give this error again.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5umL6F6fPuLV1NzUG by firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage thanks! I've filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036615
       
 (DIR) Post #B5umMjenbvTK1xBR3Y by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @firefoxwebdevs Thank you :konathumb:
       
 (DIR) Post #B5uoZmjtf7JnGLuzBI by firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage this is happening because the site tests for support of `::-webkit-scrollbar`, but assumes that `::-webkit-scrollbar-button` would also be supported, and that isn't true in 152.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5uobUymfED4lDhN6O by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @firefoxwebdevs Thank you again.CC @hj can this help ?
       
 (DIR) Post #B5ur1lIknjaWougrc8 by Pi_rat@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @firefoxwebdevs @mangeurdenuage In split view, if you switch between split tabs and close right one rather than focusing other split tab it move to right one(if you have tab to right).
       
 (DIR) Post #B5ur1lU67Yf7O5zvIO by firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Pi_rat could you write this up at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Firefox&component=Tabbed%20Browser%3A%20Split%20View and give me the link? I'll make sure it's tagged up properly
       
 (DIR) Post #B5ur1lgVNQaS0ZnpdQ by Pi_rat@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @firefoxwebdevs :( don't want to make an account, bug is minor annoyance and somebody will report it
       
 (DIR) Post #B5ur1loIuQpEOlS3n6 by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Pi_rat @firefoxwebdevs If everyone has that reasoning it doesn't get noticed for a long time.
       
 (DIR) Post #B611sGJssztUZOeRua by hj@shigusegubu.club
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage @firefoxwebdevs wrong mentionWhy does mozilla add -webkit-scrollbar but not -webkit-scrollbar-button? why mozilla adds -webkit stuff at all? why throw an error and not just ignore unsupported stuff? why? why? why?
       
 (DIR) Post #B612LkrmORAlhsZKXA by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @hj @firefoxwebdevs >wrong mentionOof sorry I'm only noticing this now.>why mozilla adds -webkit stuff at all?Why not ? Isn't KHTML good ?
       
 (DIR) Post #B612P66TtGvcRQ2Ugi by hj@shigusegubu.club
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage @firefoxwebdevs firefox isn't webkit
       
 (DIR) Post #B612Q3jsASUjOfvHmK by hj@shigusegubu.club
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage @firefoxwebdevs firefox already has -moz prefix
       
 (DIR) Post #B613LtsiyUJVcZdzRA by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @hj @firefoxwebdevs It would be nice to understand why.
       
 (DIR) Post #B613XBEsmSN6diO3WK by hj@shigusegubu.club
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mangeurdenuage @firefoxwebdevs mozilla works in mysterious ways.
       
 (DIR) Post #B61AFjRxXuBnD38AS0 by firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @hj @mangeurdenuage unfortunately it isn't so mysterious, it's a consequence of real-world usage.There's even a standard for some of this stuff https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/. It's sad that it's this way, but it's required to make a browser that works with in-the-wild content.
       
 (DIR) Post #B61AH7NK4ta1hZcgAC by mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @firefoxwebdevs @hj Thank you for the response.