Post B5uFjUGPiC7QSi1CyG by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
 (DIR) More posts by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
 (DIR) Post #B5uFjUGPiC7QSi1CyG by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @strypey btw @ MOLE:But also, that a number of jurisdictions have issued clarifications that auto-generated content isn't subject to copyrightThey said it isn’t subject to new copyright, to protection as a new work. That doesn’t preclude it from being an automated edition/collage of other works which requires a licence to do (and then, distribute, etc).
       
 (DIR) Post #B5w8qaFnWpSRhi5Sls by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       (1/2)@mirabilos> That doesn’t preclude it from being an automated edition/collage of other works which requires a licence to doIndeed, but that's a separate issue. One of a number raised by using a Trained #MOLE. I've been trying to get @fdroid to formulate a rigorous policy on this;https://forum.f-droid.org/t/does-f-droid-have-a-formal-policy-on-libre-ai/Partly because F-Droid need one, made partly because we need one for fediverse.party, and I don't want to define it in isolation.#AI #FDroid
       
 (DIR) Post #B5w8qaaiH4BikZsAN6 by mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @strypey @fdroid ah, I’ve also attempted to at least recognise it as one of their antifeature labels
       
 (DIR) Post #B5w8qiEfqtJQSXcg88 by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       (2/2)Maybe we need a meeting about libre issues raised by "AI", similar to the one that produced the Franklin St Statement?