Post B5U2gsrzQ6vYOT44Tw by leo@60228.dev
 (DIR) More posts by leo@60228.dev
 (DIR) Post #B5U2gsrzQ6vYOT44Tw by leo@60228.dev
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       looking forward to kernel nat64 support finally being merged (well. sort of. the idea is that they're upstreaming SIIT and if you want another architecture you stack it with NAT66 and/or NAT44)
       
 (DIR) Post #B5U2gt5Sc1hd4FMpTk by alina@girldick.gay
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @leo weh no 464xlat :(
       
 (DIR) Post #B5U32qsRVeZAaHkfHU by leo@60228.dev
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @alina isn't the CLAT in 464XLAT just SIIT?
       
 (DIR) Post #B5U39bsbfSey683DCy by alina@girldick.gay
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @leo yeah but when you said they'll only upstream SIIT i assumed you meant SIIT-DC-2xlat but i seemingly just can't read
       
 (DIR) Post #B5U3K3sgPlkdq14QIC by leo@60228.dev
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @alina they might add other kinds of NAT64 in the future but the MVP being upstreamed is a siit0 device that re-emits any IPv4 packets as IPv6 and vice versa, and you compose it with existing routing/firewalling functionality for anything more complex than pure classic SIIT