Post B5DBp8uFHFjOLXoWTQ by niconiconi@mk.absturztau.be
 (DIR) More posts by niconiconi@mk.absturztau.be
 (DIR) Post #B5DBp8h841Etgrg31s by whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       wow, Samba is good. Linux smb client + smb server currently let me saturate a 2.5GBASE-T NIC... if gunzip didn't become the bottleneck first. you don't see that often!
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DBp8uFHFjOLXoWTQ by niconiconi@mk.absturztau.be
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @whitequark@social.treehouse.systems IIRC, it won't work very well if you have sign + encrypt
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DBx2sPZxPhxkiye0 by whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @niconiconi I assume not but this is a trusted LAN. over Tailscale it can barely reach 1 Gbps (which is still pretty decent for what it is, but not enough for TBs of data)
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DFClCLNIChd6ETyq by gsuberland@chaos.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @niconiconi @whitequark it's actually fine as long as you have RSS queue pinning enabled on the Samba side, and a CPU with AES GCM extensions. I've done >10Gbps that way.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DFJS0f7CRg92xVtA by whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       in fact it's slow enough (after upgrading to pigz it's line rate limited again) that i should just get a 10G DAC and an SFP+ NIC; i don't like waiting four hours for a tar command
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DFJSFuCWdeuK5geG by datenwolf@chaos.social
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @whitequark I can relate: Each and every time I'm attending to a study surgery it make me wanting to rip out all the network cabling from the hospital's walls and replace it with something contemporary.The imaging system that I built most recently produces ~12.5 GiB/s (i.e. ~100 GBit/s). The network in that building (opened in 2021 BTW) saturates at ~250 MBit/sPR people and politicians always boast about "we need 5G for telemedicine". How about we start with internal comms infra first?
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DYBFiepCuaq6LFEe by lynne@mk.pars.ee
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @whitequark@social.treehouse.systems I looked into it when I got sick of SSHFS disconnecting, but went with NFS over WireGuard since it's faster. I even wanted to use NFSv3 over UDP to keep everything UDP but they've pretty much removed support for it, plus NFSv4 had more features.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DYBFw817gfVse0ES by whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lynne unreliable NFS links traumatized me when i was a teenager to such an extent i still wouldn't voluntarily use NFS, hah
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DYBG6POtuW1lSDFw by pomagarnet@chaos.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @whitequark @lynne this has also very much been my experience, NFS is hell for debugging and permissions and general support in shitty NAS OSes compared to SMBunfortunately I see a lot of friends (incl myself lol) read about SMB vs NFS and conclude NFS must be better since it's less complex and SMB must be for Microslop Windows fileshares, but no actually, it's probably the best we got for Linux<>Linux transfers
       
 (DIR) Post #B5DdxeLx2X4uuVcNOK by jj@social.jjgadgets.tech
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @whitequark @niconiconi have you tried over mobile data + WireGuard?Apparently others say it's atrocious but I feel like it's line rate of my mobile data (whose upload is like 10-20Mbps on 4G and 35-50 on 5G SA anyway)
       
 (DIR) Post #B5Ddxee1xJXXoa4oZU by niconiconi@mk.absturztau.be
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jj@social.jjgadgets.tech @whitequark@social.treehouse.systems I don't understand the relevancy of 50 Mbps mobile data regarding to the file transfer performance via a gigabit LAN here.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5Dt372rI0nSepkaPY by tschundler@leds.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @pomagarnetOn my network, I get better bandwidth out of SMB for Linux<>MacOS than I do with NFS. It's on a 10Gbit network and SMB gets to about 2Gbits from ZFS on an old server, while NFS I think only did about 1G. (I did this test about 5y ago. The computers were connected through a MikroTik switch.)@whitequark @lynne
       
 (DIR) Post #B5EmSbv97v5v8RJXqC by jj@social.jjgadgets.tech
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @whitequark @niconiconi oh I thought Cat was referring to Tailscale as in Tailscale for a remote "road warrior" client out of the physical area of the LAN, seems I'm mistaken now that you pointed it out.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5EmSc9KHCR9qPwrwW by niconiconi@mk.absturztau.be
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jj@social.jjgadgets.tech @whitequark@social.treehouse.systems It's the same client. But Tailscale is just a VPN. You can use it for any purpose including using it in a LAN, not necessarily as a "road warrior" setup.