Post B55NUQfDhicFWbzoCe by ori@hj.9fs.net
(DIR) More posts by ori@hj.9fs.net
(DIR) Post #B55NUPDt3r9r3YCSxc by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
Damn those Mythos benchmarks seem very promising
(DIR) Post #B55NUPi1FpGEZ0IWvY by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
Wild that they don't seem to be making it GA, makes me suspect it's probably actually not as good as they say
(DIR) Post #B55NUPzODF9hQsQP0C by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
Qwen 3.6 is essentially the same as Opus 4.6 now so I guess we'll see how the new generation stacks up?
(DIR) Post #B55NUQEzHFdGDFirJY by justin@toot.io
0 likes, 0 repeats
@pojntfx I really don't get the excitement around tech that destroys the earth more than we as humanity have in our history so far?
(DIR) Post #B55NUQQKb4hqmR1uzo by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@justin The fix isn't to not use useful tools it's to a) deregulate clean energy infrastructure so that we expand them China-style and b) make sure that the models are open so you can run them on clean energy right nowThis is the same argument like with EVs "but the grid is dirty" like yes. Fix that. Don't be anti-EV because of it
(DIR) Post #B55NUQfDhicFWbzoCe by ori@hj.9fs.net
0 likes, 0 repeats
What's the fix for the people behind it explicitly having the goal of replacing the human mind as a tool of thought?CC: @justin@toot.io
(DIR) Post #B55NUROF0Kd1mF3lNQ by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@justin Something changed, either in the harness or the models idk but something changed ~Nov of last year, maybe ~Feb this year I'm not sure, but it's gone from "useless" to "useful" pretty quickly.
(DIR) Post #B55Nh0bHv0vuSI9gMi by ori@hj.9fs.net
0 likes, 0 repeats
We're racing to build hell because some people find the current level of warmth a little bit useful, and others think they'll get rich selling fuel for the furnaces.CC: @pojntfx@mastodon.social @justin@toot.io
(DIR) Post #B56dWgLEBAjl9ThVaq by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ori @justin > What's the fix for the people behind it explicitly having the goal of replacing the human mind as a tool of thought?I don't know tbh. They are not intelligent or sentient. I'm kind of hoping this is kind of self-evident by the quality of things produced w/o intention just being bad? Having the statistically most likely program to fix problem X isn't particularly interesting IMHO ...
(DIR) Post #B56dWgq4KVPIh888fI by ori@hj.9fs.net
0 likes, 0 repeats
My objection is not technical, but is about the people behind them and their goals.However, in addition, I don't have a good definition of intelligence, and I don't believe believe that they need to be sentient in order to replace most uses of our brains. As the cryptographers say, "attacks only get better".CC: @justin@toot.io
(DIR) Post #B56dWgyZosDF7W6vvU by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ori @justin I know exactly one example of "mass" adoption of vibe coded software out in the wild atm (mise) except for ofc the tools arounds LLMs themselves. And that's only for dev-focused tooling. Not a single one that regular people useAdoption of those tools in e.g. MS has been a bit of a disaster as is well known even by regular people at this pointLots of vibe-coded e.g. Nextcloud clones out there now, and despite Nextcloud's UX being terrible people still prefer it over the clones
(DIR) Post #B56dWhJUZ6wWANtdWi by pojntfx@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ori @justin Ultimately it's just a question of whether or not you've put the care and attention and actual labour into making something vs. if you haven't 🤷♀️ The same people that created Electron boilerplate slop TODO apps in the mid-2010s will continue to do the same thing in the mid-2020s. On the other hand, some Electron apps (esp. VSCode IMHO) are also pretty well liked because they work reasonably well, and I suspect the same will happen again in the future.