Post B51Pwu0rbKQZvxz6xs by ada@zoner.work
(DIR) More posts by ada@zoner.work
(DIR) Post #B51PR4Uj5xOnAwm5S4 by codebergstatus@social.anoxinon.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
Hi all, we're aware that Codeberg is down right now and are investigating.
(DIR) Post #B51PR4nVy6Qa7DZ5jk by june@ak.vern.cc
1 likes, 0 repeats
everyone dogs on github for its uptime by a multi billion dollar company running it, and talks about how independent ran things have better uptime, and how we all need to migrate away from github to codebergbut codeberg’s uptime and how much it goes down over and over again and how it seems like they dont do anything to improve the situation is incredibly disappointingRE: https://social.anoxinon.de/@codebergstatus/116358482252787838
(DIR) Post #B51PR4qLnYhEG0tM9o by codebergstatus@social.anoxinon.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
We believe we have established the cause and are observing that our services are recovering. We are monitoring the situation. Should we have any further updates to make, we will let you know. Thank you for your patience.
(DIR) Post #B51PR5DkOZPZQZq2cq by lumi@snug.moe
0 likes, 0 repeats
@june i moved to codeberg for ethical reasons, not for quality reasonsi also feel it is important to point out that codeberg is a small org and github is part of a huge corporationmicroslop definitely has the resources to make github not suck. they just don't, because their incentives lie somewhere else
(DIR) Post #B51PdjkTXVQib7BFU8 by june@ak.vern.cc
1 likes, 0 repeats
@lumi im aware that codeberg is “a small org”, everyone says the exact same thing to defend the excuse for codeberg going down the 100th time in the past 3 monthsat some point it clearly starts to show theyre making little to no effort to stop the repeated outages
(DIR) Post #B51PeA6hXUeoLZmMjo by june@ak.vern.cc
1 likes, 0 repeats
@lumi codeberg isnt ran by 1 single person
(DIR) Post #B51Pf9wDeZ7071Ls0W by lumi@snug.moe
0 likes, 0 repeats
@june i think it's fair to get upset at that, yeah
(DIR) Post #B51Pwu0rbKQZvxz6xs by ada@zoner.work
1 likes, 0 repeats
@june@ak.vern.cc @lumi@snug.moe generally my stance is, if you're going to dunk about service quality and then use an objectively less stable service as a substitute the dunking was just because it was vogue and not actual belief.there's a billion and one reasons to hate github, you don't have to invent new ones.like the github uptime "going down after microsoft" thing is bad data. the site that scraped it has questionable metrics prior to 2018.there's also the fact that microsoft has KPI mandates, and all silicon valley ventures they don't actually track KPIs
(DIR) Post #B51QJnYxkRqgadqsca by ada@zoner.work
1 likes, 0 repeats
@lumi@snug.moe @june@ak.vern.cc i've been using github for basically two decades and i can very confidently say 2016 was not a year with 100% uptime, the status page just didn't fucking track it
(DIR) Post #B51QKGU0Dy72HekpPs by ada@zoner.work
1 likes, 0 repeats
@lumi@snug.moe @june@ak.vern.cc like if you told me that the status page was manually handled by an intern i would believe youthere were so many weekends github would spit out unicorns non stop