Post B4rdRIBDfXMvOi3CKG by endrift@social.treehouse.systems
 (DIR) More posts by endrift@social.treehouse.systems
 (DIR) Post #B4rdRIBDfXMvOi3CKG by endrift@social.treehouse.systems
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Everyone is talking about the LLM rewrite of Claude Code being uncopyrightable, but that's missing the point: that does that mean it can't violate copyright. It also ignores the even bigger elephant in the room: if LLM code isn't copyrightable, then the majority of Claude Code itself isn't copyright-protected in the first place.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4rdRMLIC1nqJ6nIa8 by endrift@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       IANAL so I can't 100% speak to the former point, but the latter point is...a simple conclusion from what we already know about gen AI copyright.I really hope someone with a lot of resources posts that Claude Code leak, gets DMCA'd, then actually fights back. Let's show big tech that using LLM coding agents is a legal risk from yet another angle.