Post B4pfkV4Zlk9ATiJHkG by progo@boop.city
 (DIR) More posts by progo@boop.city
 (DIR) Post #B4pfkSztUBDI2c6WAa by progo@boop.city
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Someone around me recently asked about Youtubism words that maybe prevent a video from being demonetized even when we're talking about advertiser-unfriendly stuff.Amy Shira Teitel takes a look at current words trends.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iskCvr7_1ck
       
 (DIR) Post #B4pfkTDiemGwjUZYie by progo@boop.city
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Watched the intro. Gonna watch the rest later.I don't agree with her use of the term "self-censorship" to for when YouTube uses financial punishment to make video producers conform. I'm lukewarm about whether YouTube's censorship is bad or okay in this case, since they're a "private company" with advertisers. But it's censorship, not self-censorship.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4pfkTUNepbFZAMrgm by ent@noauthority.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @progo If people are altering their own language based on YT's censorship, I'd call that self-censorship too
       
 (DIR) Post #B4pfkU5bQRNFQbmahs by progo@boop.city
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       And, I hate YouTube for other reasons; I don't trust them and I find the overall YouTube system morally reprehensible. And I keep watching videos there too.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4pfkUZ1f2uStrY5ZI by progo@boop.city
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       They should write up the current censorship rules, explicitly, so everyone understands the contract. It shouldn't be based on how the algo feels today.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4pfkV4Zlk9ATiJHkG by progo@boop.city
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       lol.