Post B4UIZ1RRDde47zP3Fg by foufoutos@kafeneio.social
 (DIR) More posts by foufoutos@kafeneio.social
 (DIR) Post #B4UIZ1RRDde47zP3Fg by foufoutos@kafeneio.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I think i should abandon distros using SystemD #Linux #SystemD #AgeVerification
       
 (DIR) Post #B4UIZ1gKKHYSsAMwSW by zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.org
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @foufoutosLinux is actively implementing age verification features in response to laws like California's AB 1043, effective January 1, 2027.orporate-Backed Distributions (Exploring Compliance)    Ubuntu / Canonical: Reviewing internally; no concrete plans yet.Fedora / Red Hat: Exploring a local /etc/ file and D-Bus API with self-attestation, no telemetry.Pop!_OS / System76: Opposes mandates; actively lobbying for open-source exemption.    Elementary OS: Publicly considering implementation.Community & Independent Distributions (Resisting or Refusing)    Debian: Discussing on mailing lists; no official position.Arch Linux: No response; no infrastructure for compliance.Artix Linux: Firmly refused: "We'll NEVER require any verification."NixOS: No response; declarative model complicates enforcement.Void, Alpine, Devuan: Not using systemd; may need alternative data sources.Projects Taking Action    MidnightBSD: Excluding users from California and Brazil.Arch Linux 32: Blocked access from California and Brazil.Ageless Linux: Actively refusing compliance; building tools to remove age verification.    Omarchy, Adenix: Declared refusal to implement.    The systemd birthDate field (merged March 18, 2026) affects all systemd-based distros, forming a data layer for potential compliance.    Non-systemd distros (e.g., Artix, Void) avoid this by design.Linux distributions AB 1043 age verification compliance statusCorporate-Backed Distributions (Exploring Compliance)Community & Independent Distributions (Resisting or Refusing)Projects Taking Action