Post B4JlBqHBKG5klpLUae by natty@astolfo.social
 (DIR) More posts by natty@astolfo.social
 (DIR) Post #B4JlBptmjFNPbGOo7c by federicomena@mstdn.mx
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I'm pretty sure someone sent another LLM-generated patch to librsvg.  It's for a feature in rsvg-convert that I don't want, so I explained my rationale as kindly as I could.But the code is very subtly wrong.  I did not comment on the code at all.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4JlBq5U1kjaBXs9M8 by federicomena@mstdn.mx
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       You know that painstaking, standard-looking format for a merge request that LLMs like to generate?SummaryMotivationImplementationFiles changedUsagePatchAm I being unkind in ascribing LLM usage due to *that* format? If LLMs didn't exist and a person had written that, I would say, well, how organized and kind of them.  But I know no one writes MRs like that, and I feel conflicted about that being my main source of suspicion.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4JlBqHBKG5klpLUae by natty@astolfo.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @federicomena@mstdn.mx mmm it's not the amount of writing or the outline, but whether it's full of tautologies and empty statements