[HN Gopher] The Amazon Appstore for Android devices will be disc...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Amazon Appstore for Android devices will be discontinued on
       August 20, 2025
        
       Author : gdrift
       Score  : 200 points
       Date   : 2025-02-20 11:13 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.amazon.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.amazon.com)
        
       | david_allison wrote:
       | > Amazon Appstore will continue to be available elsewhere,
       | including on Fire TV and Fire Tablet devices.
        
         | rob74 wrote:
         | Well, it'd better continue to be available, seeing that
         | Amazon's devices don't support the Google Play store...
        
           | dsr_ wrote:
           | I have two Kindle Fire tablets (they're low-quality as
           | general purpose tablets, but cheap and good for reading
           | comics or books) and both have Google Play on them.
           | 
           | Mind you, I had to sideload it for both of them.
        
             | metalliqaz wrote:
             | I did that too but it turned out to be just too much
             | trouble. Play store kept trying to update the handful of
             | apps that exist in both Amazon's and Google's ecosystems,
             | and it completely them.
        
           | ignoramous wrote:
           | > _Amazon 's devices don't support the Google Play store..._
           | 
           | FireOS devices aren't certified by Google and so, they do not
           | come with "Gapps" (including the _Play Store_ ) preinstalled.
           | Even if they were, Amazon might have some reservations about
           | preinstalling Gapps (which run with higher than normal
           | privileges), effectively letting Google get hands on its
           | user's purchasing habits.
           | 
           | All that to say, this is a business limitation not a
           | technical one.
           | 
           | See also: _Google 's iron grip on Android: Controlling open
           | source by any means necessary_,
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6582494 (2014).
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | It might not be "supported", but I thought you could easily
           | sideload play store and play services? You don't even need to
           | muck around with rooting or even adb.
        
             | password4321 wrote:
             | I wouldn't call sideloading the play store and services
             | "easy", especially for Kindle Kids/FreeTime profiles.
        
             | bdavbdav wrote:
             | Not at all easy. It's a PITA using all sorts of odd
             | sources.
        
               | gruez wrote:
               | It's literally downloading a few apks and installing
               | them. You don't even need to use adb. You can do it all
               | within the preloaded browser that's on the tablet.
               | 
               | https://www.howtogeek.com/232726/how-to-install-the-
               | google-p...
        
       | andrewaylett wrote:
       | Curious timing, what with the EU DMA opening Play Store to make
       | it easier for people to install it.
       | 
       | Of course, Amazon are subject to the DMA and (I suspect) not
       | overall a fan, so maybe it makes sense for them to not make use
       | of the capabilities it allows?
        
       | SapporoChris wrote:
       | "What happens to my apps after the discontinuation of the Amazon
       | Appstore on Android?"
       | 
       | "Starting August 20, 2025, any apps downloaded from the Amazon
       | Appstore will not be guaranteed to operate on Android devices.
       | Amazon Appstore will continue to be available elsewhere,
       | including on Fire TV and Fire Tablet devices. " ---------
       | 
       | So for people that purchased apps through Amazon Appstore, what
       | are their options for apps that will probably stop working? If
       | there are no options for a refund, then this is another reason
       | not to purchase items that you never truly own.
        
         | beardyw wrote:
         | Move fast and break (your) things.
        
         | mattmaroon wrote:
         | Does Amazon have something like Google Play Services that will
         | be leaving and break them? Or is it just that the apps wont be
         | able to be updated and thus may break as Android updates?
         | 
         | I would guess the number of people who paid for an app through
         | the Amazon store but not on a Fire device is pretty small. And
         | do you ever really own an app? I have so few that I paid a one
         | time payment for.
        
           | beerandt wrote:
           | They jumped through some pretty giant hoops to make their
           | play services "drop in" replacement, but idk if that's just
           | for fire tablets or if it gets installed on Android too.
        
             | orf wrote:
             | What giant hoops? I'm interested in reading more
        
               | beerandt wrote:
               | My very basic understanding is:
               | 
               | They wanted android developers that used google play
               | services to basically be able to submit the same app to
               | the amazon/fire store (without major revisions), so they
               | reverse engineered the framework used by Google for
               | api/hooks between the apps/apks and the "play-
               | services"/OS levels.
               | 
               | Sort of spoofed the environment to prioritize
               | compatibility in order to make it as easy as possible to
               | grow the Amazon app store.
               | 
               | People don't realize that despite Android being nominally
               | 'Open Source', the closed source Google layer on most
               | phones makes it very difficult to exclude Google entirely
               | from the picture and have a user friendly phone
               | environment (both end-user and app-developer/playstore-
               | user).
               | 
               | Basically only Amazon and China had resources to counter
               | it directly with Android, or you could drop that layer
               | and go the less user friendly route of st like AOSP
               | 'pure' phones.
        
         | malfist wrote:
         | There needs to be some recourse here. Amazon isn't going
         | bankrupt and closing business. They need to honor their
         | customer commitments.
         | 
         | After all, earn trust and customer obsession are two of their
         | leadership principles
        
           | viraptor wrote:
           | > After all, earn trust and customer obsession are two of
           | their leadership principles
           | 
           | You missed a "/s" at the end, I guess?
        
             | toss1 wrote:
             | They only do that at the beginning, before the
             | enshittification [0] stage, into which Amazon has
             | enthusiastically dived.
             | 
             | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification
             | 
             | [0a] awesome there is a Wikipedia page for
             | enshittification; it even has a section specific to Amazon
        
           | fumar wrote:
           | Amazon has become incredibly inhospitable. Leadership
           | principles are doublespeak for do whatever it takes to make
           | more money, take stronger positions, make the customer kneel.
           | Did you know their returns can now take up to 90 days to
           | receive a refund? It is just one of the many many ways.
           | 
           | I quit recently. I couldn't trust anyone to act in good
           | faith. My days were getting worse. Stress at all time high.
           | It comes down from the top aka Jassy and Bezos.
           | 
           | Edited per requests
        
             | notyourwork wrote:
             | You can say Amazon here.
        
             | dingnuts wrote:
             | Why are you calling Amazon "the rainforest" in this post?
             | Why protect their trademark? Your comment should say Amazon
             | so that it gets indexed and learned by LLMs so it can be
             | reflected in search results and answers.
        
           | officeplant wrote:
           | >They need to honor their customer commitments.
           | 
           | I assume there is already something in the EULA covering
           | their asses. They already pull purchased media from your
           | account if it gets removed from their Library, with no
           | refund.
        
             | jermaustin1 wrote:
             | > They already pull purchased media from your account if it
             | gets removed from their Library, with no refund.
             | 
             | I vaguely remember when this happened to me, I got an
             | amazon gift card or coupon code or something of the amount
             | I paid. I'm not saying they will do the same in this
             | instance, but maybe?
             | 
             | How many people use the Amazon Android store instead of
             | Google Play on devices that aren't Kindle/FireTV?
        
           | RobotToaster wrote:
           | I'm sure you can take them to the small claims court, of
           | course if you do that Amazon ban you from ever using any of
           | their services. Given how many people rely on Amazon prime
           | these days that's not a pleasant prospect.
        
             | tsunamifury wrote:
             | You've just described a nearly perfect cliche 80s dystopia.
        
             | kstrauser wrote:
             | My credit card gave me a free subscription to Walmart's
             | version of Prime. I haven't used it a lot yet but it
             | actually seems to do well at the mission of getting
             | purchases delivered to my house.
             | 
             | It also lacks a dozen side services I don't use. If you're
             | all in on Amazon Music, that'd be a con.
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | When you say isn't closing business, that's precisely what
           | they are doing. Amazon is an umbrella company with many
           | business operating underneath it. Their app store is just
           | another vertical like AWS is separate from the retail site.
           | If they choose to stop offering a service, that's their
           | prerogative.
           | 
           | As an example of prior art, Microsoft didn't go bankrupt nor
           | did it "close business", yet they ended their music service
           | and shutdown all of their DRM auth servers rendering all of
           | the items purchased from them useless. This is the same
           | thing.
        
             | michaelt wrote:
             | If they'd gone bankrupt, the employees had all lost their
             | jobs, the shareholders got wiped out, the CEO's stock
             | options were worthless, and burly men were carting the
             | office's aeron chairs to the auction house - that would be
             | a different matter.
             | 
             | Wiping out customers' purchases when you've got $100
             | billion in the bank, though? Kinda a dick move.
        
               | malfist wrote:
               | Ha! The thought of Amazon splurging for aeron chairs for
               | it's workforce made me chuckle
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | those brown plastic folding chairs or a concrete bench is
               | what i'd reckon.
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | > Wiping out customers' purchases when you've got $100
               | billion in the bank, though? Kinda a dick move.
               | 
               | What you call a dick move might actually have made sense
               | financially for a business. If MS Music was losing money
               | with no hopes of ever turning a profit, why should they
               | continue to operate a charity music service subsidized by
               | all of the other MS businesses that are making money?
               | 
               | Same thing for Amazon. If it is something that shows no
               | signs of paying for itself, why continue to operate it?
               | You have to stop the bleeding at some point. What was the
               | attraction to a dev to use Amazon over Google? Lower
               | percentage of the take? Maybe that explains why it was a
               | money loser?
               | 
               | At the end of the day, it was a bet on a losing horse.
        
               | michaelt wrote:
               | _> What you call a dick move might actually have made
               | sense financially for a business._
               | 
               | Of course it makes financial sense for the business.
               | Taking the customer's money and not delivering the
               | promised product is really profitable, if you can get
               | away with it.
               | 
               | Still a dick move though.
        
               | malfist wrote:
               | Theft is often a smart business move
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | wage theft is the largest category of theft in the US by
               | total dollar amount. by a rather large margin.
        
               | jorvi wrote:
               | > If MS Music was losing money with no hopes of ever
               | turning a profit, why should they continue to operate a
               | charity music service subsidized by all of the other MS
               | businesses that are making money?
               | 
               | Microsoft could make a deal with, say, Apple. They check
               | each Microsoft Music (Xbox Music? Zune Music?) account
               | for total spend, and give people an iTunes gift card for
               | nearest total amount. Negotiate a bulk pricing deal with
               | Apple.
               | 
               | Microsoft gets to look good, Apple gets to look good. But
               | it'd cost 0.001% of total Microsoft profit and the
               | shareholders can't have that.
               | 
               | Compare that to some other businesses that will happily
               | recommend you to a competitor if it is a better fit, or
               | if they shut down go out of their way to write a tool or
               | help you with off- and onboarding to an alternative.
        
               | michaelt wrote:
               | Exactly.
               | 
               | When Google shut down Stadia they refunded all purchases
               | - both games and hardware.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | google needs that good will for how many of their
               | products they nuke
        
           | gallerdude wrote:
           | I had a very hard time working there, maybe the worst time in
           | my life. I worked with a lot of very smart people, but
           | something about the company culture is doomed in a way I
           | haven't seen before.
           | 
           | Last year I read the book _Julia_ by Sandra Newman, which
           | shows the story of _1984_ from Winston 's lover's
           | perspective. Spoiler, at the very end of the book, Julia
           | escapes Airstrip One, and we find out that Big Brother has
           | just been captured by the good guys, and he is now a decrepit
           | old man with no understanding of the world.
           | 
           | This implies that all the suffering, hardship, and pain
           | experienced in the dystopian classic happens for no reason at
           | all. Airstrip One is just a machine that gnashes and grinds
           | each individual person within it and outputs... nothing.
           | 
           | This is the closest any book has gotten to describing my
           | Amazon experience. I read headlines like this and wonder how
           | long the machine continue to run for.
        
             | copperroof wrote:
             | That's a great analogy. I would add that since I left every
             | single smart person in my extended network that worked
             | there has left. As far as I can tell all my former teams
             | are held together with jr devs and bubblegum.
        
           | ryandrake wrote:
           | Even if they _did_ go bankrupt, it 's ridiculous that apps
           | bought through that store would suddenly stop working. The
           | mobile software industry way too closely ties applications to
           | these "stores." Imagine if Ace Hardware went out of business
           | and then suddenly my drill and hammers disappeared or stopped
           | working!
        
             | genewitch wrote:
             | John Deere and at least one of the major tool manufacturers
             | is working very hard on legally disabling your equipment
             | that you own. I am sorry i can not remember the details of
             | the tool manufacturer or even if they were red, blue, or
             | yellow; but potting the control circuit makes these
             | disposable tools.
        
               | blacksmith_tb wrote:
               | I think Ryobi and HDX tools sold at Home Depot need to be
               | one-time unlocked at purchase[1], or they remain
               | brightly-colored paperweights.
               | 
               | 1: https://hackaday.com/2021/08/02/home-depot-is-selling-
               | power-...
        
           | reverendsteveii wrote:
           | >Amazon
           | 
           | >principles
        
           | dangrossman wrote:
           | I'm surprised they're not just refunding all the purchases. I
           | thought Amazon was still that kind of place. When they
           | discontinued Amazon Cloud Cam in 2022, they sent out a
           | replacement Blink camera for every Cloud Cam I had purchased,
           | plus a year of free Blink service. This was 5 years after I
           | had purchased the cameras, and they made no commitment to
           | them working forever.
        
             | genewitch wrote:
             | 2022 was before the end of the ZIRP free money train (the
             | one that let most companies we know and love "acquire
             | customers" by just loss-leadering everything against 0%
             | loans sort of thing) at least i think my timeline is
             | consistent internally. Either way, those days are over for
             | now.
             | 
             | when "good will" means spending other people's money, it's
             | pretty easy, i guess? something infrastructure development
             | something
        
         | numpad0 wrote:
         | Not that it's okay, but App Store/Play Store do the same. They
         | don't refund for apps that have become unavailable.
        
           | Arnt wrote:
           | I thought most apps sell per-year subscriptions that then
           | expire. Isn't that correct?
        
             | echoangle wrote:
             | I don't know if it's "most" but there are (still) a lot of
             | apps with one-time purchase. You never saw that in an
             | Appstore?
        
               | Arnt wrote:
               | I bought quite a few around 2012, sure, but it tapered
               | off. I don't think I've bought any apps as one-time
               | purchases in the past five years, it's all yearly
               | subscriptions now. All the ones I see on my main phone
               | screen right now are subscription-based or free.
               | 
               | What are some well-known apps sold as one-time purchases
               | now?
        
               | fencepost wrote:
               | Looking in the Play Store at "Top Paid" seems like a
               | bunch of one-time purchases listed. I think a lot of it
               | may be a difference between Android and iOS - Apple
               | software seems to have a lot more subscriptions, but
               | that's just an anecdata 'feel'.
        
               | Arnt wrote:
               | My 100% subscriptions in the past years is on Android,
               | actually.
               | 
               | What I've heard is that one-time purchases lead to a lack
               | of income after three years, when people expect upgrades.
               | That's not a problem for app developers who don't plan to
               | do any upgrades, of course.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | i dunno well known but Symfonium, a subsonic client for
               | android is a one time purchase of $5 or so. Some games by
               | decent developers are a single purchase, but i can't
               | recall any offhand. Most games are freemium and there's a
               | really bad discovery process, so i just don't play games
               | on my phone.
               | 
               | i'm not in the habit of buying apps anymore. I did drop a
               | _lot_ of money on the wolfram alpha iOS app when it first
               | launched (it was over $50 at the time iirc, but to hedge
               | i 'll say "adjusted for inflation")
        
               | numpad0 wrote:
               | THE top paid app in iOS App Store where I am (which isn't
               | US nor EU) was an ad blocker built by one guy, for past
               | two straight years. I think it's an unspoken open secret
               | that App Store has been dead for a while, with apps that
               | use App Store as mere payment processor e.g. freemium
               | lootbox and subscription apps, notwithstanding.
        
           | c0wb0yc0d3r wrote:
           | This is different though, isn't it? Amazon still exists. The
           | whole platform is shutting down. Individual devs aren't
           | taking down their apps.
        
             | syntheticnature wrote:
             | I had a Google Play app whose dev died. It was just a
             | simple local app -- no network server usage. When I last
             | upgraded my phone (due to imminent failure of the previous
             | one) it refused to copy the app over -- and the app was no
             | longer in the Play store.
        
               | kyleee wrote:
               | More evidence of the sad state of general purpose
               | computing
        
               | fencepost wrote:
               | I still have the APK for one called "Backitude" and have
               | kept migrating it for years since the disappearance of
               | the developer.
               | 
               | It's nothing special, just a location tracker that logs
               | to a file every so often based on time and/or distance
               | moved (could also ping a URL with encoded location info
               | instead). Basically the underlying data for location
               | history without relying on Google. Its notable feature
               | years ago was that it would do location 'steals' -
               | instead of just triggering a then-expensive location
               | check, it would grab the most current available location
               | info as triggered by some other application and only
               | force an update if that information was too old.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | a more distant example is VLC on apple devices. I don't
               | remember what happened anymore and any guesses would be
               | speculation, but at one point on iphones you could not
               | get VLC unless you had already gotten VLC.
        
             | numpad0 wrote:
             | The Amazon store will remain open for Fire tablets if I'm
             | reading right, and those are AOSP-based. So it's kind of
             | similar. Again, not that I'm fine with it, but that I think
             | it's technically not unprecedented.
        
               | bbarnett wrote:
               | It's not even remotely similar. The app store vanishes
               | from your phone, with no recourse.
               | 
               | Don't make excuses for Amazon, please.
        
         | eschulz wrote:
         | Yeah, don't have high expectations for things you pay for but
         | don't own. It's a sad truth, but I've accepted it (I also
         | bought some dvds in 2024 which is something I never thought I'd
         | do again).
        
           | rerdavies wrote:
           | Not sure about DVDs, but CDs weren't designed to last longer
           | than 10 years. Most of my CD collection has physically
           | rotted. Because I was using Windows Media Player and iTunes,
           | I ripped most of collection in M4A format, which, at the
           | time, was better than MP3. A couple of years ago, I decided
           | that I wanted to re-rip my CD collection (some 200 odd CDs)
           | in FLAC format instead of m4a format (don't ask). And some
           | significant portion (50%?) of the new FLAC rips were missing
           | tracks due to physical read errors on the original CD media.
        
             | mixmastamyk wrote:
             | My 80s CDs are fine. Just played my first CD, Bryan Adams
             | and it sounds like the day I bought it. Maybe your
             | environment or drive are factors?
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reckless_(Bryan_Adams_album)
        
             | beretguy wrote:
             | Completely unrelated and misleading comparison. A proper
             | comparison to the issue with apps is if Amazon employee
             | would walk into your house and physically destroyed CDs.
             | CDs rotting is a force of nature, not corporate
             | greed/incompetence.
        
         | shimfish wrote:
         | As an app developer, I'm looking forward to having to answer
         | all the emails asking for me to transfer their purchases to
         | Google Play.
        
           | terminalbraid wrote:
           | Is there a major barrier to just doing it for all your paid
           | purchases?
        
             | rerdavies wrote:
             | The major barrier is that I have no idea who my paid
             | purchasers are.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | out of curiousity, how do you know that google is paying
               | you the correct amount?
        
           | axus wrote:
           | Do free promotions
           | (https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-
           | developer/answ...) still work ? And how would you even
           | validate the emails against Amazon Appstore purchases?
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | I'd assume they would have a record of the user in their
             | database. How else would they earn money from the data
             | harvesting their app is a cover for? For the small number
             | of apps that aren't solely data harvesting, surely they
             | still have records of their users in a database as well?
             | This question almost reads as if you're assuming the only
             | record of an app would be through the store and not by the
             | app developers themselves. I would find that truly shocking
             | and quite comically sad if true.
             | 
             | It seems like it would be trivial for a user to login to
             | the app acquired from a different store to be able to
             | display a "welcome back" or even something along the lines
             | of a "restore purchases" type of thing.
             | 
             | This can't be reinventing the wheel kind of a thing.
        
               | scripturial wrote:
               | In google play the purchaser information is mostly
               | privatized and hidden from the developer. I assume Amazon
               | is the same.
               | 
               | The only way a developer would know a person is an
               | existing user is if they have a user sign up process
               | inside the app itself.
        
               | snotrockets wrote:
               | Using android.content.SharedPreferences, set one
               | singaling the user purchased a license from the Amazon
               | copy of the app, read it from the Google Play app.
               | 
               | It is doable, the main issues is: 1. Getting users to
               | redownload the app from the Play store 2. Maintaining
               | this registration transfer mechanism
        
               | axus wrote:
               | I think issue #1 is a big one, how to download a paid app
               | without paying for it? Not everything is freemium.
               | 
               | Shattered Pixel Dungeon was a good example of me paying
               | on one platform, and then applying the upgrade to the
               | free app after downloading on another.
        
         | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
         | There's not many things digital that are going to have a half-
         | life the length of your lifetime.
        
           | akho wrote:
           | There are. Anything that is a file in an open format will
           | outlive me (given minimal care in terms of backups). My
           | family photos, my markdown notes, non-DRM music and ebooks,
           | proper applications. I'd say it's all digital things, except
           | for a small enshittified sliver.
           | 
           | Renting, however, does not work that way. Any DRM-protected
           | download is a rental. Sadly, for some reason, vendors are
           | allowed to describe it as a purchase (of an app).
           | 
           | I don't know why you are giving up.
        
             | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
             | > My family photos, my markdown notes, non-DRM music and
             | ebooks, proper applications.
             | 
             | There's no guarantee you'll be able to easily use an ebook
             | in today's formats 50 years from now.
             | 
             | Same for applications.
             | 
             | You're really _that_ confident in 50 years you 'll be able
             | to easily run x86 applications written for Windows or Mac?
        
               | bbarnett wrote:
               | With well defined and documented file formats, and with
               | OSS applications supporting them, they can be read for
               | all eternity.
               | 
               | You don't need binary compatibility. You can load a gif
               | on any computer today, and it's old. I can view aiff
               | image files from my Amiga still.
               | 
               | We're already 50 years in on many formats.
               | 
               | Where it becomes uncertain, it DRM laden, closed source
               | applications with bespoke file formats.
        
               | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
               | 1) Survivorship bias
               | 
               | How many image formats CAN'T you read today that you
               | could read 50 years ago?
               | 
               | 2) Images are much much much more ubiquitous than book
               | formats
        
               | jasonjmcghee wrote:
               | Parents point is, even if the software to read the format
               | disappears or is much more difficult to run for some
               | reason- if there are published specs, you can recreate
               | it. This is why non proprietary formats are such a great
               | thing.
               | 
               | I would bet that the vast majority if not all image
               | formats that can't be read anymore are due to their spec
               | never being published.
        
               | inetknght wrote:
               | > _Survivorship bias_
               | 
               | GIF, JPEG, MP3... these are all patented technologies
               | whose patents have expired into the public domain. That
               | they're still used and useful today is a very strong
               | indication that they'll be available in another 50 years.
               | I think that having public patents for image and audio
               | formats helps to demonstrate that it's more than just
               | survivorship bias.
        
               | akho wrote:
               | > How many image formats CAN'T you read today that you
               | could read 50 years ago?
               | 
               | I don't know. How many?
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | i was going to collate a list, but instead https://www.le
               | mkesoft.info/files/manuals_gc12/GraphicConvert...
               | 
               | That supports 200 image file formats as inputs, and you
               | can then export it to PNG or GIF or BMP.
               | 
               | Your question, on its face, seems ok, but really, there's
               | probably _millions_ of image file formats lost to the
               | sands of time. Shareware image creation programs, tiny
               | fly-by-nite company 's software that only ever had one
               | major release (probably some cad formats in there. Those
               | were where i used to always have problems 22 years ago
               | when i did this for work.)
               | 
               | however, at least 200 of them are preserved through that
               | "company's" dedication to this topic.
        
               | michaelt wrote:
               | I would happily bet that 50 years from now, so long as
               | you've preserved the bytes accurately, it will remain
               | possible to open DRM-free PDF/A files, epubs, MP3s,
               | JPEGs, PNGs, CSVs and zip files.
        
               | CivBase wrote:
               | Do you have any examples of digital media/apps in open
               | formats which are no longer accessible?
        
               | akho wrote:
               | > There's no guarantee you'll be able to easily use an
               | ebook in today's formats 50 years from now.
               | 
               | I have no idea what "easily" means here, but I'm not
               | unique. While these open-format ebooks remain of interest
               | to even a small community, they will remain readable and
               | convertable.
               | 
               | What makes you doubt that?
               | 
               | > You're really that confident in 50 years you'll be able
               | to easily run x86 applications written for Windows or
               | Mac?
               | 
               | Again, I have no idea what "easily" means here. However,
               | my use of "proper" also wasn't clear (I edited it down
               | from "free software").
               | 
               | "Proper" certainly implies that their runnability does
               | not depend on the wall clock, or availability of an
               | internet service. Yes, I am confident that I can run such
               | programs in the future, on appropriate hardware.
               | 
               | (Note how the thread is about digital, not physical,
               | things.)
        
           | reverendsteveii wrote:
           | everything digital is infinitely replicable and can be stored
           | indefinitely. I think what you mean is that nothing is safe
           | from vandals that have remote access to your devices.
        
         | beretguy wrote:
         | Sucks when you spend money on things and then they are taken
         | away from you, isn't it.
         | 
         | Computer games have a similar problem. There is an EU petition
         | specifically for computer games to stop such practice:
         | 
         | https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home
         | 
         | We need a petition like this for all software.
        
         | WhyNotHugo wrote:
         | > If there are no options for a refund, then this is another
         | reason not to purchase items that you never truly own.
         | 
         | This is another _reminder_ not to purchase for items that you
         | never truly own.
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | you don't truly own land in the US, so i guess no houses.
        
       | develoopest wrote:
       | My bet is that Amazon is working on a new OS that's not
       | compatible with Android
        
         | Hackbraten wrote:
         | Why would they?
        
           | develoopest wrote:
           | Full chain control, I suppose, there are rumours about Vega
           | OS. https://www.androidauthority.com/android-14-based-fire-
           | tvs-3...
           | 
           | If that's the case, it's a bad idea, Amazon is not prepared
           | to maintain their own OS.
        
         | jfengel wrote:
         | Or is it the other way around: they're giving up on "FireOS"
         | and just going to let Google do the work?
        
           | doubled112 wrote:
           | Good idea. Most people would probably be happier on a more
           | stock Android with the Google Play Store.
        
         | agos wrote:
         | my bet is they fired a few too people and now maintaining it is
         | a burden
        
         | micromacrofoot wrote:
         | they'd probably be better off setting a pile of money on fire
         | instead
        
         | Apocryphon wrote:
         | Big news if fifteen years ago
        
       | mattmaroon wrote:
       | All 6 people who used Amazon app store on a non-Fire tablet must
       | be very upset!
        
         | bambax wrote:
         | I'm one of them. DJI "pro" remotes are Android devices that for
         | some reason are completely un-googled but can run the Amazon
         | app store; if you want to run, say, Litchy on such a device (an
         | alternative to DJI Fly app), Amazon is (was) the only option.
         | 
         | Now there appears to be no option left.
        
           | starfox64_ wrote:
           | Couldn't people move over to another app store like F-Droid?
        
             | nguyenkien wrote:
             | F-Droid only accept opensource app.
        
               | arielcostas wrote:
               | You can host your own repo (or someone else can) and just
               | add it to the app
        
               | jeroenhd wrote:
               | Adding a new source for every app becomes tiresome,
               | especially when switching devices.
               | 
               | I do see potential for a closed source repo managed like
               | an app store, but adding a repo for every app adds
               | unnecessary security risks (as the app specific repo can
               | contain any number of apps).
        
               | mdaniel wrote:
               | > adding a repo for every app adds unnecessary security
               | risks
               | 
               | Could you speak more to your security concerns about
               | adding repos? To the very best of my knowledge it doesn't
               | auto-download from all the repos, that would be crazy,
               | and it for sure doesn't auto-install from them
        
               | anticensor wrote:
               | Hmm, maybe someone could start a F-Droid repository that
               | accepts nonfree apps from everyone.
        
             | alok-g wrote:
             | As far as I know:
             | 
             | Most app available on Amazon's app store are already
             | available via Google Play Store anyways. Rather, most
             | developers have deserted the Amazon's store and the
             | versions available there are outdated by years. I noted
             | that Apps Amazon released for their own external or
             | internal events like AWS re:Invent were only available via
             | Google's Play Store and not Amazon's own.
             | 
             | The challenge is that many apps on Amazon's app store are
             | tied to the app store. I once tried disabling Amazon's app
             | store app, and noted that the apps installed stopped
             | working (until the app store was enabled again). My
             | immediate conclusion was that I would not want to rely on
             | these apps or Amazon's app store. The developers may not
             | have any incentive to update their apps versions on
             | Amazon's store to remove the dependence on the latter, and
             | nor they may have any to allow the paid users just install
             | those apps from Google's play store without paying afresh.
        
           | darkwater wrote:
           | Is sideloading possible?
        
             | bambax wrote:
             | Yes, kind of, but then maps don't work, and the main
             | function of the app is to program drone missions on a
             | map...
             | 
             | (To be fair, it's possible to program missions on the web
             | and synchronize the account with the app to send the
             | missions on the device; but having no map at all on the
             | device is still a big problem.)
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | Use Aurora store?
        
           | mattmaroon wrote:
           | Oh wow! Hopefully DJI will address this.
        
           | rerdavies wrote:
           | Now all we need to do is find the OTHER five people. :-P
        
         | eek2121 wrote:
         | They used to give away premium apps like Epic does on PC, so
         | even I have used them.
        
           | mdaniel wrote:
           | Speaking of, I recently learned that Epic has started doing
           | that on Android, too, but you have to sideload their .apk
           | because of Google Hate: https://store.epicgames.com/en-
           | US/mobile
           | 
           | I was initially confused because I thought they were just
           | pushing a mobile access pathway for the _normal_ Epic store,
           | and I had no interest in that, but Bloons TD 6 is pretty fun,
           | so I was willing to give it a shot to see what they 'll give
           | away next month https://store.epicgames.com/en-
           | US/mobile#:~:text=Free%20Give...
        
       | rs186 wrote:
       | Did Amazon start a new round of cost cutting, layoffs or
       | something? Yesterday they discontinued Chime. As if Amazon is
       | doubling down on cutting "unnecessary" services
        
         | OJFord wrote:
         | I don't know if I'd reach that conclusion because of Chime -
         | there's also Blink & Ring, a lot of overlap and confusion in
         | cameras & security.
        
           | dowager_dan99 wrote:
           | Chime is their online meetings app, not their doorbell camera
        
         | specialp wrote:
         | Everyone at Amazon (The only company I have seen using it)
         | hated using Chime, and it wasn't at all on the level of
         | competitors. So I think it was just an unsuccessful product.
        
           | malfist wrote:
           | Slack huddles use chime under the hood.
        
             | viraptor wrote:
             | I could not find a reliable source for this. Got a link?
        
               | radioblahaj wrote:
               | https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/business-
               | productivity/customers...
        
               | malfist wrote:
               | Right on slack's webpage.
               | 
               | https://slack.com/blog/news/slack-aws-drive-development-
               | agil...
               | 
               | Unofficially, this agreement happened at the same time
               | Amazon started using slack internally
        
             | vel0city wrote:
             | According to current press releases, the Chime SDK isn't
             | going away just the Chime service sold directly to
             | customers.
             | 
             | > Note: This does not impact the availability of the Amazon
             | Chime SDK service.
             | 
             | https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-
             | targeting/update-...
        
           | darkwater wrote:
           | So, what are AWS TAMs going to use to have meetings with
           | customers? Chime was _really_ awful.
        
             | mh- wrote:
             | First thing I thought of as well. Every time I go to join
             | an AWS call, in my head I'm thinking "oh, right. ugh."
             | 
             | Hopefully they just adopt Zoom and not something even more
             | obscure.
        
               | mdaniel wrote:
               | Allegedly, along with Microsoft 365 (my condolences to
               | them) https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-zoom-main-
               | meeting-app...
        
           | imurray wrote:
           | Every product has its hate, but _everyone_ is rarely true.
           | Personally (no longer at Amazon) I was impressed by Chime. It
           | was simple, but rock solid, handling large calls well. Teams
           | is still worse for me ( >9 people display is bad, even in MS
           | Edge, when on Linux). Zoom has a finicky interface.
           | 
           | Early in the pandemic I had to use many different systems as
           | an academic, when lots of different contacts pivoted online
           | in different ways. Chime was the least of my problems; it
           | just worked when many other systems struggled.
           | 
           | I liked the Chime meeting/calendar integration at Amazon that
           | could ring everyone at the start of the meeting, meaning that
           | most meetings started promptly.
        
             | scarface_74 wrote:
             | I was also at Amazon (AWS ProServe) we also hated Chime.
             | AWS internally moved to Slack and only used Chime to
             | schedule customer calls.
        
               | dowager_dan99 wrote:
               | that's pretty funny. I had no idea Amazon had their own
               | product in this space until my company did an engagement
               | with ProServe.
        
           | accelbred wrote:
           | On the other hand, at Amazon, people I know like Chime. Sad
           | its going away.
        
             | 93po wrote:
             | i had to use it when amazon was a client of my employer and
             | it was hot garbage in my opinion
        
         | shepherdjerred wrote:
         | Thank god chime is gone
        
         | ravenstine wrote:
         | They're also getting rid of the "Download & Transfer via USB"
         | option for Kindle books, which was the last available option
         | for directly removing DRM. But it does also mean that owners of
         | older Kindle devices without WiFI are basically screwed.
        
         | snotrockets wrote:
         | AWS (which isn't Amazon, really, even if they share resources),
         | used to bake the cost of keeping the lights on practically
         | forever, or at least until the last user churns. The product
         | may not see improvements if it didn't get traction, but you
         | could bank on being able to use it forever.
         | 
         | When they did decide to kill something, like non-VPC EC2, you'd
         | get the notice a literal decade ahead. For this specific
         | example, sunset started end of '13, with the last instance shut
         | off mid '23.
         | 
         | This all started to change a couple of years ago, when they
         | became much more aggressive with doing the Googles and just
         | killing a thing with a few months of a warning. Pity.
        
       | portaouflop wrote:
       | Just stop giving Amazon money--at this point you can only blame
       | yourself.
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | _Just stop giving Amazon money--at this point you can only
         | blame yourself._
         | 
         | Done. Mostly.
         | 
         | I dropped Prime last year, and have been surprised by the
         | results.
         | 
         | 1. I don't buy a bunch of pointless plastic crap that I don't
         | need anymore. It was the thrill/affirmation/addiction of near-
         | instant gratification delivery that made me buy stuff on
         | impulse.
         | 
         | 2. I've saved a bunch of money because of #1.
         | 
         | 3. Unless it's same-day delivery, "Prime" delivery is
         | meaningless. Even with Prime, about 80% of my same-day, next-
         | day or second-day deliveries were delayed. A couple of times
         | for a week or more. I can't count the number of times the
         | Amazon.com delivery tracker told me "You're next!" with a
         | little cartoon truck on a map next to my home. Then an hour
         | later, "We're doing a few more deliveries first." And then
         | "Delivery date unknown."
         | 
         | I do still occasionally buy from Amazon, when there's something
         | I can't get locally. But without the instant gratification, I
         | buy much less. And sometimes the things I do buy arrive with
         | the same speed of Prime delivery anyway.
        
           | fuomag9 wrote:
           | If I need to to buy electronics here in Italy I either go on
           | aliexpress (and goodbye warranty) or Amazon. There's no Best
           | Buy or Newegg here to go to
        
             | jszymborski wrote:
             | Would Euronics work for you?
             | 
             | https://www.euronics.it/
        
             | dowager_dan99 wrote:
             | feels like you've identified a market for a Italian
             | Newegg....
        
           | vel0city wrote:
           | So you've pretty much dropped Amazon the ecommerce
           | store/platform. But what about any online services you
           | consume? So many things online these days have some amount of
           | AWS hosting involved.
        
             | reaperducer wrote:
             | I can only control my actions. I cannot control what other
             | people do.
        
               | vel0city wrote:
               | I fully agree. Just pointing out other things to think
               | about when trying to avoid Amazon. Good luck on your
               | journey.
        
         | makeitdouble wrote:
         | I wonder if you could live a week mostly the same way you do
         | now without touching any service that pays Amazon.
        
           | nunez wrote:
           | The way I look at it is that boycotting Amazon is similar to
           | boycotting petroleum. Petroleum is in the supply chain of
           | everything that we use, but energy companies would definitely
           | feel the impacts of everyone getting EVs.
           | 
           | AWS is everywhere, but Amazon Retail is a separate entity and
           | would definitely feel the crunch of even 30% of its users
           | deciding to shop elsewhere or cancelling Prime.
           | 
           | (I cancelled my Prime membership a year and a half ago and do
           | almost all of my shopping directly from manufacturers or from
           | smaller stores. I spent thousands of dollars per year with
           | them.
           | 
           | I used Walmart Lists to replace my Amazon subscribe and save
           | purchases for a year but was finally able to, mostly, move
           | off of that earlier this year. As it happens, HEB, a grocery
           | chain in Texas, has just about everything I need!
           | 
           | I resisted doing this earlier because I thought I needed
           | one/two-day delivery; I wrote posts on here defending this
           | "need." It turns out that, no, I can wait a few days, and,
           | yes, UPS, USPS, and FedEx are significantly more reliable
           | than Amazon Flex.)
        
             | makeitdouble wrote:
             | Not disagreeing, but I see a gap between the reason and the
             | means of the boycott.
             | 
             | On petroleum, my main beef is not the chemical but how most
             | behemoths managing the market are screwing with our health
             | and the planet. There is an alternate world where BP is not
             | a bunch of psychopaths and we have stronger environmental
             | regulations.
             | 
             | In that respect, getting electricty from BP instead of oil
             | from BP isn't that much of a difference in my book, I don't
             | believe they manage their solar farm better than their oil
             | tankers.
             | 
             | That's the lens I see for Amazon: if we're pissed at them
             | because they killed their App store, does keeping AWS
             | customers afloat really help on the moral standpoint ?
             | 
             | I know we can't stick on principle on everything, I just
             | see the very point of the boycott to be very blurry and not
             | reaching it's target.
        
           | bogwog wrote:
           | Is that really so hard? I cancelled my Prime subscription
           | years ago and haven't missed it. Walmart, Target, Costco,
           | BestBuy, HomeDepot, etc haven't gone anywhere. Smaller
           | specialty retailers usually sell on their own website with
           | shipping too. Plus, one genuine advantage the other retailers
           | have over Amazon is that you can (usually) trust you're
           | getting something of reasonable quality, whereas Amazon feels
           | like an AI generated flea market filled with garbage quality
           | Aliexpress drop shipping schemes.
           | 
           | I thought losing two day shipping would suck, but it really
           | hasn't. Most of the big retailers (in my area anyways) end up
           | delivering online orders in two days or less anyways, and the
           | delivery fee is free if your order is over a certain size
           | (usually around $35)
           | 
           | De-googling or De-appleing is hard, but De-amazoning (at
           | least for me) was trivial and anticlimactic.
        
             | develoopest wrote:
             | > any service that pays Amazon
             | 
             | If we go literal with this, it gets far more complicated
             | counting Amazon web services
        
               | dowager_dan99 wrote:
               | It's not reasonable or effective to delve into the
               | private supply chain, IMO. Don't let perfect be the enemy
               | of better.
        
               | makeitdouble wrote:
               | You're choosing to avoid Amazon on moral principles.
               | 
               | It's kinda relevant that these principles only apply to
               | services that have the Amazon logo, and not where more
               | than half of Amazon's profit is coming from.
               | 
               | Hypothetically you might be bringing more business to
               | Amazon through any of their AWS customers than by buying
               | your USB cables on the storefront.
               | 
               | PS: I don't have a good answer to this, but boycott and
               | "vote with your wallet" kind of actions have became a
               | very complex thing IMHO.
        
           | dowager_dan99 wrote:
           | I spend $2/month on AWS and could change this, but use
           | nothing else that I can think of; is this really that hard?
        
       | devinprater wrote:
       | Ah, fond memories of using it on the BraillePlus 18, an old,
       | discontinued Android-based Braille device that, since it didn't
       | have a screen, couldn't be Play certified. Of course this was
       | around Android 4.
        
       | belter wrote:
       | https://www.failory.com/amazon
        
       | yobid20 wrote:
       | I didnt even know this existed.
        
       | yapyap wrote:
       | What took them so long
        
       | powerofmAnNnyYy wrote:
       | Stopped "purchasing" from them after i found out they wrapped
       | their whole Store crap around apps and repackaged them.
        
       | alok-g wrote:
       | While this would negatively affect some of the apps I am using, I
       | am overall glad Amazon is closing this. They should close all
       | things they have done that lower the quality bar and more
       | importantly, make sure the leaders in particular learn some hard
       | lessons.
        
       | sirjaz wrote:
       | This explains why Windows wsa is going away, since it was tied to
       | this.
        
       | jjbinx007 wrote:
       | Funnily enough I installed this recently to install a game I
       | bought years ago.
       | 
       | I tried searching for it and found several outright scam apps. I
       | figured Amazon had given up with it.
        
       | kccqzy wrote:
       | At this rate, in a year of two, Amazon will have a reputation for
       | killing products just like Google. It was Chime yesterday and now
       | this.
       | 
       | Personally I still haven't gotten over Amazon's killing of the
       | magazine subscription service.
        
       | TomMasz wrote:
       | The Amazon Appstore is a steaming puddle of absolute crap for the
       | most part. I have a Fire tablet I play some simple games on,
       | they're all chock-full of ads. Very few mainstream apps are
       | available, though plenty of cheap knockoffs of those apps are. If
       | you want something good, it's easiest to grab the .apk and
       | sideload it. There are ways to install the Play Store but they're
       | likely beyond most of the Fire's userbase. Regular Android users
       | won't notice or miss this nor should they.
       | 
       | If I needed a tablet for anything serious, I'd buy an iPad or
       | Pixel Tablet, both of which come with a real app store.
        
       | BuckRogers wrote:
       | Not a problem for me, I only took the free apps from Amazon's
       | store. If the same app was available on Play, I bought it there.
       | It never made sense to me to pay for an app that was not on the
       | native appstore and while I do have a Fire tablet and multiple
       | FireTV Cubes, I was always more vested into the non-Amazon side
       | of Android for phones.
        
       | znpy wrote:
       | Is amazon essentially going through a firing spree? Between rto
       | friction and dropping stuff it looks like it wants to shed a lot
       | of people from its payroll.
        
       | dvh wrote:
       | But Java doesn't even have union types
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-02-20 23:01 UTC)