[HN Gopher] German Navy Confirms Its Supersized Frigate Will Avo...
___________________________________________________________________
German Navy Confirms Its Supersized Frigate Will Avoid the Red Sea
Author : tomohawk
Score : 13 points
Date : 2024-11-04 19:36 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.twz.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.twz.com)
| caekislove wrote:
| It's best to always avoid sending your warships into a war zone.
| They might get damaged, after all!
| pkaye wrote:
| Just like nobody wants their new car or couch to get dinged or
| damaged until it eventually happens and you learn to just
| accept it.
| teslabox wrote:
| US Navy Admiral Hyman G. Rickover was said to have observed,
| "There are only two kinds of ships: submarines and targets".
|
| In the modern era of low-cost drones and missiles, all surface
| ships are sitting ducks. The US Navy has missiles to shoot down
| aircraft and missiles, but these were designed to shoot down
| expensive Soviet aircraft. I think these missiles cost
| $1-2million each. A modern inexpensive attack drone goes for
| <$10,000.
|
| _A $2M missile vs. a $2,000 drone: Pentagon worried over cost of
| Houthi attacks_ -
| https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/missile-drone-penta...
|
| Warships that can deploy helicopters are still useful for
| disaster response: _When Disaster Strikes, Send the Enterprise:_
| https://sendtheenterprise.org/
|
| Edit: "According to the U.S. Navy, the Dwight D. Eisenhower
| carrier strike group expended 155 surface-to-air missiles, 135
| land-attack cruise missiles, nearly 60 air-to-air missiles and
| 420 air-to-surface weapons during what it called a "historic"
| combat deployment." - _US Aircraft Carrier 's Near Miss With
| Missile Fired by Middle East Rebels,_
| https://www.newsweek.com/us-news-aircraft-carrier-missile-fi...
| mattlondon wrote:
| Yeah this has been an interesting development regarding drones.
|
| I guess some sort of laser thing is probably most viable now if
| you consider a swarm of say 50-100 cheap drones. I would
| imagine they'd be susceptible to relatively lower levels of
| laser power than e.g an ICBM, although they they are of course
| a smaller target
| themadturk wrote:
| Apparently not completely sitting ducks, since no American
| naval ship has been damaged by drones. But the "conventional"
| anti-aircraft weaponry is like shooting a fly with a howitzer
| (almost literally). More CIWS systems and a rapid-fire laser or
| two seem like they might be effective and perhaps lower-cost.
| mrandish wrote:
| > According to the Spiegel, "other nations operating with
| warships [in the Red Sea] reported that escort was currently not
| possible."
|
| So, basically "Dear German Navy - Unfortunately, our warships are
| too busy protecting non-warships to protect your warship.
| Sincerely, Your Allies"
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-11-04 23:01 UTC)