[HN Gopher] Thousand Character Classic
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Thousand Character Classic
        
       Author : histories
       Score  : 135 points
       Date   : 2024-03-06 11:33 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | RaoulP wrote:
       | Amazing. It's like their
       | 
       | "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"
       | 
       | But with no repeated characters!
       | 
       | Although since characters are words, I guess that "room for
       | interpretation" affords some combinatorial leniency, which you
       | can't get when spelling latin words.
        
         | canjobear wrote:
         | It's still impressive---imagine writing 1000 words of English
         | without reusing any function words like "the", "it", "of",
         | "is". And just to show off, the Qianziwen holds a bunch of
         | those words for the very last line!
        
           | yorwba wrote:
           | I think it might be possible to do a literal translation into
           | English that also eschews function words - since it's poetry,
           | you can use a freely associating style.
           | 
           | E.g. the first rhyming couplet Tian Di Xuan Huang  Yu Zhou
           | Hong Huang  was translated somewhat verbosely by Nathan
           | Sturman as "The sky was black and earth yellow; space and
           | time vast, limitless" but why many words when few do trick?
           | "Dark sky, yellow earth; vast space, barren time."
           | 
           | To make it rhyme, you could replace "earth" by "lime"
           | (referring to calcium oxide, not the fruit) but that would be
           | very barren indeed.
        
           | throw0101a wrote:
           | > _It 's still impressive---imagine writing 1000 words of
           | English without reusing any function words like "the", "it",
           | "of", "is"._
           | 
           | How about:
           | 
           | > _Gadsby is a [260-page] 1939 novel by Ernest Vincent Wright
           | which includes only four words that contain the letter E, the
           | most common letter in English._
           | 
           | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsby_(novel)
        
             | chris_st wrote:
             | Or:
             | 
             | > [The novel] "A Void", translated from the original French
             | La Disparition (lit. "The Disappearance"), is a 300-page
             | French lipogrammatic novel, written in 1969 by Georges
             | Perec, entirely without using the letter e, following
             | Oulipo constraints. [0]
             | 
             | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Void
        
               | lupire wrote:
               | _La Disparition_ / _A void_ isn 't just "without using
               | that fifth glyph"; it's about a world without that fifth
               | glyph, and uncanny discomfort from not having it but not
               | knowing why, and trying to find illuminating truth.
               | 
               | Also, http://reddit.com/r/AVoid5
               | 
               | If you don't want to visit that community, you can ask
               | ChatGPT for non-fifth-glyph writing, most of which looks
               | as if it is a copy from that community.
        
               | egypturnash wrote:
               | also, there is https://dolphin.town/ which plays a slight
               | variant on this game :)
               | 
               | (and sadly will complain about expired certificates when
               | you visit it)
        
               | chris_st wrote:
               | I was on an early mastodon instance where the fifth glyph
               | was prohibited. It was really tough for me to do posts,
               | but there was a person who was getting their PhD in
               | linguistics, and if you didn't know that they had to
               | avoid that letter, you'd never guess. Just amazing
               | writing.
        
         | ssnistfajen wrote:
         | It can also function as placeholder text just like Lorem ipsum.
        
       | eru wrote:
       | Strangely, they don't say anything about a translation into
       | English.
        
         | userbinator wrote:
         | Google tried its best but not surprisingly doesn't work well on
         | poetry; it begins with "The sky and the earth are dark and
         | yellow, and the universe is primitive. Covering this body and
         | hair are the four elements and five constant elements."
         | 
         | And contains such amusements as:
         | 
         | "Gong Wei Ju Yang, how dare you damage it."
         | 
         | "It clears up confusion and benefits customs, and everything is
         | wonderful."
         | 
         | "Upgraded to accept the emperor, turned into a star of doubt."
         | 
         | "The world is luxurious and rich, and the car is fat and
         | light."
        
           | canjobear wrote:
           | ChatGPT's got it.
           | 
           | Yo, listen up, as I paint the universe broad and deep, Sky's
           | dark, Earth's yellow, secrets ancient they keep. This life,
           | this hair, rooted in the core, Four elements, five virtues,
           | what we livin' for.
           | 
           | Cities shining, from east to west we're ruling, Grounded in
           | the earth, it's agriculture we're schooling. Lose yourself in
           | books or market's charm, Life's treasures, keep close, safe
           | from harm.
           | 
           | Sun and moon, their dance of light and dark, Nature's cycle,
           | in harmony, leaves its mark. Respect for life, ain't no
           | damage done, From mountains high to rivers deep, under the
           | same sun.
           | 
           | etc.
        
           | samus wrote:
           | It doesn't help that many of these characters are not in
           | frequent use anymore, which means that the translation model
           | has been trained with way less sentences involving them.
           | Others' usage pattern have shifted, or they picked up many
           | additional meanings over the millenia, and the translation
           | model is probably not savvy enough to ignore all the modern
           | ones. With "modern" meaning everything after like 200 A.D.
        
             | sudasana wrote:
             | This text only dates to the 6th century CE
        
         | yorwba wrote:
         | Check the bibliography and external links sections, e.g.
         | http://www.camcc.org/_media/reading-group/qianziwen-en.pdf
        
         | ssnistfajen wrote:
         | The very first link under "External links" of the Wikipedia
         | page: "Transcribed, _Translated_ and Annotated Thousand
         | Character Essay by Nathan Sturman "
         | 
         | https://www.angelfire.com/ns/pingyaozhuan/tce.html
         | 
         | The meanings conveyed by the text is not very unique or useful,
         | and this is especially apparent once translated to another
         | language. It provides practically no insight to anything, as
         | this isn't a true classical text.
        
       | maxrmk wrote:
       | > By the Song dynasty, since all literate people could be assumed
       | to have memorized the text, the order of its characters was used
       | to put documents in sequence in the same way that alphabetical
       | order is used in alphabetic languages.
       | 
       | I struggle enough with 26 letters! I genuinely can't imagine
       | this.
        
         | mbivert wrote:
         | There are mnemonics to help remember the characters. For
         | example:
         | 
         | - Ji  (jealousy) is composed of Nu  (woman) and Ji  (illness,
         | hatred): jealousy is a feminine illness or a manifestation of
         | feminine hatred;
         | 
         | - Huo  (to be puzzled) is composed of Xin  (heart, intention)
         | Huo  (maybe, possibility): an unsure heart;
         | 
         | - Yu  (to be stupid) is composed of Xin  (heart, intention) Rou
         | (trample) Tian  (field): the heart of someone who tramples a
         | field (and thus ruining the crops);
         | 
         | etc.
         | 
         | You often have to be creative. If I understand the research
         | correctly[0], finding such interpretations used to be common,
         | and different people would debate different interpretations.
         | 
         | I've actually wrote a tool to help studying Chinese from that
         | perspective, by allowing to read classics such as the Thousand
         | Character Classic[1], and systematically decomposing
         | characters.
         | 
         | [0]:
         | http://crlao.ehess.fr/docannexe/file/1513/bottero.wen_zi.pdf
         | 
         | [1]: https://zhongmu.eu/book.html#c=2;w=0;b=qian-zi-wen
         | (~unusable on mobile screens).
        
         | est wrote:
         | > I struggle enough with 26 letters! I genuinely can't imagine
         | this.
         | 
         | alphabets are like x86 instructions of phonemes, Chinese
         | scripts on the other hand is the "bytecode" of many languages
         | (mandarin/cantonese/you-name-it). The first emperor of China
         | unified text writing but not the pronouciations
        
           | geraldwhen wrote:
           | Not true. You know uppercase, lowercase, and cursive, as well
           | as iconography used commonly in the west for various road
           | signs, currencies, and governments. You know flags and
           | warning labels.
           | 
           | Kanji is just a superset of that.
        
         | pjc50 wrote:
         | There's a Languagelog blog post from years ago on the
         | difficulties that even native speakers of Chinese languages
         | have in looking up words in dictionaries. Collation is a
         | serious problem.
        
       | SuperNinKenDo wrote:
       | What a strange coincidence. I just picked this up in my local
       | library about two hours ago. I just returned home now.
        
       | sudasana wrote:
       | It's difficult to overstate the importance of this and similar
       | primer texts from this period. Every literate person not only in
       | China but elsewhere in the Sinic reading world would have
       | memorized this as a child. You might not speak the same language,
       | but you could both read and write this set of 1000 characters.
       | 
       | Was also used for a Keno-style game that spread across the
       | Pacific! https://games.porg.es/games/pigeon-lottery/
        
         | est wrote:
         | > Every literate person not only in China but elsewhere in the
         | Sinic reading world would have memorized this as a child
         | 
         | Nah, Qian Zi Wen  is mainly used for practice calligraphy, are
         | you thinking of Three Character Classic (San Zi Jing ) ?
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Character_Classic
        
           | bigcat12345678 wrote:
           | Yes, Qian Zi Wen  is not common in mainland China at all. I
           | was born and raised in mainland China, and have no memory of
           | the content of Qian Zi Wen  other than the title.
           | 
           | San Zi Jing  on the contrary, is ubiquitous. I am guessing
           | everyone heard of the first 2 terms of San Zi Jing : Ren Zhi
           | Chu  Xing Ben Shan , meaning "the human nature is good"
           | 
           | This can be seen as a foundational psychology imprint of
           | relatively dossile personality on every Chinese.
           | 
           | Nowadays, I always get a vibe of Dune when reading Chinese
           | ancient classics. What a monumental accumulation of human
           | cultivation in those classics!
           | 
           | Despite communism transformation, China actually get back to
           | its traditional way of thinking and dealing with the
           | outsiders around the world.
           | 
           | Or a different interpretation: the conventional mandate of
           | heaven returned, but with a communism decoration.
        
             | kevinwang wrote:
             | > Yes, Qian Zi Wen  is not common in mainland China at all.
             | I was born and raised in mainland China, and have no memory
             | of the content of Qian Zi Wen  other than the title.
             | 
             | But the original content is talking about the past, not the
             | modern era.
        
           | SuperNinKenDo wrote:
           | Supposedly the QianZiJing was also widely memorised. The
           | SanZiJing is a MUCH later text (probably half a millenium,
           | give or take). That said, the SanZiJing is a much more
           | pedagogical and all-round meaningful text. More value can be
           | derived memorising it, as it is essentially a pre-Syllabus
           | for a classical education, not only laying out basic
           | principles, a set of texts for the student to learn, but also
           | featuring an array of keywords that a curious student with
           | access to a good teacher or extensive library can follow up
           | on, all contained in an easy to memorise summary. QianZiJing
           | by comparison is a fun and interesting literary curiosity.
        
             | SuperNinKenDo wrote:
             | I would, however, add that traditional Chinese character
             | learning involved the complete memorisation of a text,
             | followed by learning the characters associated with each
             | word of that text. Learning individual characters in the
             | way we think of as "traditional" today is actually a modern
             | innovation compared to how people used to do it. In that
             | context, memorising a text that consists of 1000 purely
             | unique characters takes on a different character, even
             | though I would think people would be better served just
             | memorising more useful texts.
        
           | DinaCoder99 wrote:
           | The thousand character classic was also used to teach the
           | reading of chinese characters in Japanese, Korean, and
           | Vietnamese, though perhaps to a lesser extent than the three
           | character classic. I have no idea to what extent this is true
           | today, but it certainly held up until the 19th century.
        
       | notresidenter wrote:
       | It's good to know that TCC was pushed by the Chinese leaders so
       | that their people could read but couldn't think and write
       | independently -- those thousand characters are not enough to
       | write anything intellectual in Chinese. Nowadays, the program
       | expects that 3000 characters are known in the third year of
       | primary school. A modern dictionary has 7000-8000 characters. The
       | Shuowen (edit: Kangxi Dictionary), the dictionary used by the
       | elite in that period to make all literary writing very hard to
       | read by using archaic characters contained 47000. TCC is very
       | political and symbolic.
       | 
       | See Lu Xun's essay in _Qiejie ting zawen_.
       | 
       | Could expand more on it if someone's interested.
       | 
       | Edit: change "government" to "leaders"
        
         | fmbb wrote:
         | Which Chinese government when?
         | 
         | These poems are supposedly 1000-1500 years old. I don't think
         | many governments (or kings, chieftains etc.) anywhere were very
         | liberal back then.
        
           | notresidenter wrote:
           | While there is a first TCC, the one from this page, the name
           | was used and reused for new manuals, intellectuals sometimes
           | argued that 1000 characters was all that the masses could
           | possibly comprehend/need.
           | 
           | At the end of the Qing dinasty, in particular, when some
           | intellectual and political leaders were preoccupied by
           | bringing "writing to the masses", intellectuals and great
           | (war|) lords participated in the movements but with the sole
           | intention of being understood by the masses without giving
           | them the ability to express themselves. For a range, it's
           | 1897-1911/1912.
        
         | yorwba wrote:
         | That's a rather idiosyncratic interpretation. If you want to
         | write something rebellious insulting the emperor, Huang Di Bei
         | Su Wu De , the thousand characters have got you covered.
         | 
         | Same for the intellectual first sentence of Confucius' Analects
         | Zi Yue : Xue Er Shi Xi Zhi , Bu Yi Shuo Hu ? And of course
         | people would also study other texts that would introduce them
         | to additional vocabulary.
         | 
         | Your character count for the Shouwen dictionary is way off, it
         | has less than 10000 distinct characters, and its primary
         | purpose wasn't to provide obscure characters for use in new
         | texts, but to provide easier-to-understand definitions for
         | characters found in old texts. A tool to ease understanding,
         | not hinder it.
         | 
         | I'm not sure which of Lu Xun's essays in particular you're
         | referring to, but in general his beef was with the continued
         | use of literary Chinese, not that people weren't being taught
         | enough characters to write in it.
        
           | notresidenter wrote:
           | The essay I'm referring to was originally published in the
           | _Shenbao_ from the 24th of August to the 10th of September
           | under the name  "Huayu" in the rubric _Ziyou Tan_ ( "Free
           | Speech"? More or less) which was then regrouped by Lu Xun in
           | _Qiejie ting zawen_ (see _Quanji_ , VI, p. 86).
           | 
           | Regarding the Shuowen, you are absolutely right, I was
           | thinking of the Kangxi dictionary.
           | 
           | Hope this clarifies it.
        
             | yorwba wrote:
             | I'm having difficulty finding an essay by Lu Xun under the
             | name Hua Yu . Maybe if you mentioned the year of
             | publication, I could find a scan of the newspaper... I
             | certainly don't have a physical copy of his collected works
             | where I can just check page 86 and know what you're talking
             | about. Wikisource has digitized versions of much (all?) of
             | his writing, can you find it in there? https://zh.wikisourc
             | e.org/wiki/Author:%E9%AD%AF%E8%BF%85#%E9...
             | 
             | I did find another text where he brings up the thousand-
             | character classic:
             | 
             | https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E4%BA%94%E7%8C%96%E6%9C%83
             | 
             | Ji De Na Shi Ting Ren Shuo , Du <<Jian Lue >> Bi Du <<Qian
             | Zi Wen >> , <<Bai Jia Xing >> You Yong De Duo , Yin Wei Ke
             | Yi Zhi Dao Cong Gu Dao Jin De Da Gai . Zhi Dao Cong Gu Dao
             | Jin De Da Gai , Na Dang Ran Shi Hen Hao De , Ran Er Wo Yi
             | Zi Ye Bu Dong . "Yue Zi Pan Gu "Jiu Shi "Yue Zi Pan Gu ",
             | Du Xia Qu , Ji Zhu Ta , "Yue Zi Pan Gu "He ! "Sheng Yu Tai
             | Huang "He ! ......
             | 
             |  _I remember hearing someone say at that time that reading
             | "Jianlue" is much more useful than reading the "Thousand-
             | Character Classic" or "Hundred Family Surnames" because you
             | can get a general idea of everything from ancient times to
             | the present. Getting a general idea of everything from
             | ancient times to the present, of course that would be good,
             | but I don't understand a word of it. "Yue from Pangu" is
             | just "Yue from Pangu", read on and remember it, "Yue from
             | Pangu!" "Born in the wilderness!" ..._
             | 
             | (It appears that he misremembered Da Huang  as Tai Huang :
             | https://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&chapter=56603&remap=gb )
        
               | notresidenter wrote:
               | The year is 1934. I'm going to try and find it (this may
               | take some time).
        
               | yorwba wrote:
               | I found the August 24, 1934 issue of Shenbao
               | https://archive.org/details/shenbao-1934.08-226/mode/2up
               | but I couldn't spot the article in there. (It's amusing
               | that the front page has a huge ad for school textbooks.)
        
           | notresidenter wrote:
           | The argument that a collection of 4-character phrases in this
           | particular manual and in the many other that follow using the
           | same name, particularly after 1911, is enough to "criticize
           | the emperor" misses the point.
           | 
           | It is not an idiosyncratic interpretation either, but it is
           | one of a contemporary, Peng Ziyun (see _Dazhongyu yu dazhong
           | wenhuade shuizhun wenti_ , _Shehui Bao_ , 1934, VII, 3)
           | 
           | As far as I'm aware, Lu Xun shared this opinion.
        
             | notresidenter wrote:
             | Actually, I've found Lu Xun defending exactly that in the
             | part VIII of that essay.
             | 
             | This is absolutely not an "idiosyncratic interpretation".
             | 
             | Imperfect translation: "Expressing one's own thoughts with
             | this was impossible, the number of characters being far too
             | small. In short, it was as if a prisoner had been given a
             | little space, but limited in such a way that he could walk,
             | stand, sit or lie down, without the possibility of jumping
             | out of the cage installed for him."
        
       | resolutebat wrote:
       | The Japanese equivalent is the Iroha, a famous poem that's also a
       | perfect pangram of kana syllables and used as the traditional
       | sort order for Japan:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iroha
       | 
       | Plus as a poem it slaps:
       | 
       | Although its scent still lingers on
       | 
       | the form of a flower has scattered away
       | 
       | For whom will the glory of this world remain unchanged?
       | 
       | Arriving today at the yonder side of the deep mountains of
       | evanescent existence
       | 
       | We shall never allow ourselves to drift away
       | 
       | intoxicated, in the world of shallow dreams.
        
         | bentley wrote:
         | I'm also reminded what's almost the inverse, a Chinese poem
         | consisting of a single repeated syllable.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_...
        
       | Pikamander2 wrote:
       | Stuff like this really makes me appreciate phonetic alphabets.
       | Even if I've never seen a written word before, I can still sound
       | it out and gain some clues on what it means.
       | 
       | I'm surprised that Chinese never became at least a hybrid system
       | like Japanese. Kanji can still be frustrating to learn, but it's
       | usually mixed with hiragana/katakana and sometimes includes
       | furigana for uncommon kanji or for texts aimed at younger
       | readers.
        
         | Tier3r wrote:
         | Chinese is quasi-phonetic, the right side (or if the character
         | is only made of one section) strongly suggests the
         | pronunciation of character. The number I have been told by my
         | tutor is 70% of the time it is similar.
         | 
         | Far bigger of a problem to me seems to be how many characters
         | are pronounced the same. I suspect that the common usage of it
         | avoids words that sound the same and cause confusion, but it is
         | still a problem.
        
           | thaumasiotes wrote:
           | That's one style of character composition, by far the most
           | common, but not the only one.
           | 
           | > I suspect that the common usage of it avoids words that
           | sound the same and cause confusion
           | 
           | This problem is solved in modern Chinese by making most words
           | more than one syllable long.
        
           | lupire wrote:
           | English also has homophones. It's challenging, but also fun.
           | There's some tradeoff between "language complication
           | (unnecessary complexity) impairs thinking" and "language
           | puzzles inspire thinking".
        
           | siraben wrote:
           | Yes, most Chinese characters are phono-semantic compounds.[0]
           | However, this makes most sense in the original Old Chinese[1]
           | phonology, where the forms were taking place.
           | 
           | For example,
           | 
           | Tang  was pronounced /*lka:NG?/ and Yang  was pronounced
           | /*laNG/, but the modern pronunciations are tang (/tkaNG214/)
           | and yang (/jaNG35/) respectively. So the phonetic part Yang
           | /*laNG/ no longer consistently represents that sound,
           | although in this case the final -aNG is still present.
           | 
           | And as for sounds that were present in Old Chinese but not in
           | Middle Chinese and Mandarin, like [2] Xun  was pronounced
           | /*sqku:ns/, now xun (/cyn51/), they underwent a series of
           | regular sound shifts that make them sound quite different
           | when used in characters in Mandarin.
           | 
           | Also, Old Chinese was not a tonal language, tones first
           | appeared in Middle Chinese, which the modern system derives
           | from (with changes). Tones never had a chance to appear in
           | writing.
           | 
           | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_character_classific
           | ati...
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Chinese
           | 
           | [2] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E5%B7%BD
        
         | gwd wrote:
         | I've been studying Mandarin since around 2010. For various
         | reasons, about 8 months ago I started studying Biblical Greek.
         | After about a week, once I'd got the letters down, it was
         | amazing HOW MUCH easier it is to learn when you can Just Read
         | words you've never seen before!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-08 23:02 UTC)