[HN Gopher] Germany's inefficient love affair with open windows ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Germany's inefficient love affair with open windows (2021)
        
       Author : KennyBlanken
       Score  : 9 points
       Date   : 2023-12-30 21:16 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.politico.eu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.politico.eu)
        
       | KolmogorovComp wrote:
       | The article cites windows opening inward as a reason for
       | inefficient ventilation, yet the answer is to... insulate less?
       | 
       | > The key may be to have less insulation, because the current
       | system seems to be too airtight to accomodate for residents'
       | differing preferences
       | 
       | Why not change the windows to open outward/upward?
        
         | rad_gruchalski wrote:
         | The point is: you open those windows to let the humidity out.
         | Warm air holds more water than cold air. The warmer it gets
         | inside, the more humidity. If you don't open your windows, the
         | humidity escapes through least isolated areas, very often
         | window sills. Sills get naturally colder, at below 12 degrees
         | celsius you get mold in the sills. So, open your windows to
         | blow the humidity out of the apartment but don't open for too
         | long so the sills don't cool down too much, especially not
         | below 12 degrees celsius.
        
       | mtmail wrote:
       | Related and currently on the frontpage with 80 comments:
       | "Stossluften: Shock Ventilation" "This word (and concept) is
       | especially found in public places and schools all around
       | Germany." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38813856
        
       | hasoleju wrote:
       | Based on the title I first thought there is an open source
       | operating system used in Germany I was not aware of.
       | 
       | But is really true ,,Luften" is something we do in every room
       | every morning here.
       | 
       | Luckily modern Bauhaus architecture style homes have windows down
       | to the floor so that opening them is always possible because
       | there is no sideboard with plants on top in front of the window.
        
       | Slartie wrote:
       | It is actually kind of common in Germany that landlords attach
       | copies of news articles about the need for correct ventilation or
       | similar "notes" to rental contracts when handing them over to a
       | new resident. Not exactly part of the rental contract (because
       | it's not legally possible to dictate the exact ventilation cycle
       | desires of the landlord in a rental contract), but still a very
       | clear hint at what's expected of you.
       | 
       | I've never assumed anyone to actually do all of this excess
       | ventilation, though...I've always been too lazy to "open all
       | windows three times a day for five minutes each" (where the heck
       | do people find the time to do that each and every day?), and the
       | "solution" of just opening the window a little over a long period
       | is so obviously expensive in terms of heating costs that I rather
       | keep most windows closed most of the time (except bathroom after
       | showers for obvious reasons).
        
       | PreInternet01 wrote:
       | OK, although "stupid Germans keep opening windows to defeat
       | stupid green goals" is of course _a_ take, in reality, a modern
       | energy-efficient Euro-style building will:
       | 
       | -Indeed be 'airtight', in the sense that limited air (and noise,
       | as a bonus) will enter or leave the building except via defined
       | ventilation routes.
       | 
       | -Offer primary 24/7 ventilation (mostly for CO2 management) via
       | ingress/egress vents as part of a balanced ventilation system,
       | which performs 'comfort' regulation of incoming air temperature
       | using heat recovered from outgoing air.
       | 
       | -Heat or cool the building via under-floor convection connected
       | to a reversible heat pump. This will slowly but surely bring most
       | of the building mass to a comfortable temperature regardless of
       | season.
       | 
       | - _In addition_ to basic ventilation and heating /cooling offer
       | very-well-insulated yet securely operable windows for additional
       | temporary ventilation. Window openings are very much defined
       | ventilation routes as part of the 'airtight' plan.
       | 
       | The important things to keep in mind here are that the balanced
       | ventilation system prevents things like mold already, and that
       | opening windows for brief periods of time (as in: measured in
       | hours) for (perceived) comfort won't impact energy efficiency
       | very much at all.
       | 
       | The most relevant criticism here is that retrofitting existing
       | buildings for the above scheme is a significant challenge, but
       | that doesn't quite seem to be the point the article wants to be
       | making...
        
       | RGamma wrote:
       | I highly recommend installing a decentralized ventilation system
       | with enthalpy exchanger in often used rooms like the sleeping
       | room.
       | 
       | It's super efficient and improves air quality a lot when your
       | building is highly insulated. The enthalpy part is important
       | because winter air is pretty dry after heat exchange. Bonus
       | points when you can fit good air filters (ePM1 50%+). Also, some
       | systems offer a summer bypass for cooling in summer without AC as
       | well as "smart functions" like orchestration of multiple devices
       | or automatic control via CO2/humidity sensor.
       | 
       | Central ventilation is unfortunately very hard to retrofit...
        
         | amluto wrote:
         | > ePM1 50%+
         | 
         | If there's actual poor air quality (smoke, etc), this is
         | inadequate. 50% is fine for a recirculating system -- fine
         | particles will be reduced by half on each pass. For for a
         | single pass system, if you have 50 mg/m3 outdoors (quite common
         | in a lot of places, sadly) you get 25 mg/m3 coming in through
         | your fancy ventilation system, which is not great.
         | 
         | What you want is a great honking filter, 95% or better, with a
         | prefilter. You'll pay several hundred dollars for that big
         | filter, but you'll be running it at low velocity (maybe 150cfm
         | of flow in a 24"x24" filter housing), so it will have minimal
         | pressure drop and will last a _long_ time. Even an actual HEPA
         | filter wouldn't be out of place here.
         | 
         | But even the really fancy European ERV/HRV brands use those
         | inadequate ePM1 50% filters. I've even measured them with a
         | handheld particle counter -- they work every bit as poorly as
         | one would expect from the specs. And those filters are small,
         | and they gunk up quickly.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-30 23:01 UTC)