[HN Gopher] Judge pares down artists' AI copyright lawsuit again...
___________________________________________________________________
Judge pares down artists' AI copyright lawsuit against Midjourney,
Stability AI
Author : starshadowx2
Score : 9 points
Date : 2023-10-30 22:35 UTC (25 minutes ago)
(HTM) web link (www.reuters.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.reuters.com)
| artninja1988 wrote:
| Good. Most claims got dismissed (although with leave to amend)
| with only the infringement on the input side really remaining.
| This lawyer is a clown
| brucethemoose2 wrote:
| Why is Midjourney completely off the hook while Stability AI is
| not?
|
| I'm trying to pull up the original court document, but the PDF
| isnt loading.
| williamcotton wrote:
| _Orrick also dismissed McKernan and Ortiz 's copyright
| infringement claims entirely._
|
| Well, duh. The judge is helping out the plaintiffs in this case.
| A jury would have been easily convinced by the defense that no
| images produced by Stability's systems are visually derivative.
|
| The key is indeed what follows:
|
| _Orrick also dismissed McKernan and Ortiz 's copyright
| infringement claims entirely. The judge allowed Andersen to
| continue pursuing her key claim that Stability's alleged use of
| her work to train Stable Diffusion infringed her copyrights._
|
| So unless sometime before the trial there is some kind of summary
| judgement I would wager that this becomes the focus of both
| sides.
|
| But that's it. As predicted, the outputs of Stable Diffusion are
| distinct from the model and are not infringing on copyright.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-10-30 23:01 UTC)