[HN Gopher] On-demand audio passes linear audio
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       On-demand audio passes linear audio
        
       Author : giuliomagnifico
       Score  : 31 points
       Date   : 2023-08-25 14:27 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.edisonresearch.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.edisonresearch.com)
        
       | elf25 wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | politelemon wrote:
       | I'm amazed to hear about the podcast numbers. I find I'm
       | incapable of paying attention to podcasts, I can't do anything
       | else while listening, yet I struggle to sit still during the slog
       | that is an external conversation. I'm much more attuned to
       | reading.
       | 
       | But there are hundreds of millions of people, I probably walk by
       | them frequently, who are listening to podcasts every day while
       | doing other activities.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | "Live"? The article says "linear". Listening to a recording being
       | played over some one-to-many distribution system is not "live".
       | 
       | Is playing a recording "linear" or "on demand"?
        
         | anyfoo wrote:
         | Context. I can say the sentence "I'm playing this record for
         | you live on air now", and everyone knows what is meant. So did
         | you when you read the headline, presumably. These are not
         | mathematical terms.
        
         | barryrandall wrote:
         | It's a media industry-specific use that generally means "the
         | broadcaster picks what to play and when" or "the opposite of
         | on-demand."
        
           | Animats wrote:
           | That makes sense for "linear". Calling something "live" when
           | it's a remote one to many system just playing out a playlist
           | is a bit much.
        
       | drewcoo wrote:
       | Even more insular audio bubbles than programmed radio stations of
       | the past?
       | 
       | I'll stick with WFMU to get some weird in my ears, thanks.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | JimtheCoder wrote:
       | I can't remember the last time there was something actually worth
       | listening to on "live audio".
       | 
       | At the same time, not knowing in advance what the content will be
       | is sort of a killer for me...on-demand has a bit of social proof
       | through reviews and comments, whereas live audio is sort of a
       | crap shoot.
        
         | jjulius wrote:
         | >I can't remember the last time there was something actually
         | worth listening to on "live audio".
         | 
         | https://kexp.org/
         | 
         | >... whereas live audio is sort of a crap shoot.
         | 
         | Crap shoots can be fun, though!
        
         | dmonitor wrote:
         | NPR is still pretty fun to listen to occasionally.
        
           | ComputerGuru wrote:
           | > NPR is still pretty fun to listen to occasionally.
           | 
           | Agreed but with heavy emphasis on "occasionally."
           | 
           | I grew up listening to NPR. It's not the same any more - and
           | not just compared to way back when but even when compared to
           | a mere ten years ago. The amount of (relatively subpar)
           | content that is purely picked and broadcast for the purpose
           | of showcasing <instance of behavior or existence of person
           | meeting certain carefully selected bullet points determined
           | by the political policy of the broadcasting station> makes
           | the signal-to-noise ratio for non-agenda-sharing listeners
           | rather poor.
           | 
           | It's a real shame because there are such treasures on there
           | that drown in the sea of subpar content picked only because
           | it serves the agenda of the station in question, and doubly-
           | so because the national NPR w/ independently run regional
           | stations model is absolutely terrific for promoting local
           | journalism.
        
           | NotSuspicious wrote:
           | Sometime in the past decade NPR became unlistenable for me.
           | I'm not sure if they changed or I did but I rarely feel I get
           | anything out of listening to NPR other than annoyance.
        
             | Workaccount2 wrote:
             | Seems like an unpopular opinion, but I am in the same boat.
             | 
             | A few years ago I got a job where I could listen every
             | morning again after a few years without. The virtue
             | signalling was so intense that it came off almost like a
             | comedy.
             | 
             | To be fair though, I am talking more about the local
             | affiliate station (WNYC) than NPR itself. However, NPR
             | still doesn't stray far from the core demographics of their
             | member stations.
        
             | jononomo wrote:
             | I was just talking to someone about this exact same thing
             | yesterday and I also made the comment "I'm not sure if they
             | changed or I did".
             | 
             | For twenty years I consumed hours of NPR content per day
             | and was even a contributor, but now I can't stand NPR.
        
           | mcpackieh wrote:
           | I haven't listened to it in some years, but IMHO the best of
           | NPR was the pre-recorded programs like Radiolab. Live
           | segments were mostly just yammering, in one ear and out the
           | other, nothing said in such segments has persisted in the
           | conscious portion of my brain.
        
           | rat87 wrote:
           | I listen to NPR all the time. Through my podcast app. Very
           | rarely do I listen to them live (mostly if android auto is
           | temporarily on the fritz)
        
           | progrus wrote:
           | Fresh Air has become an audio tranquilizer for old black
           | ladies and their old white "allies". There is a clumsy
           | attempt to shoehorn race-baiting into nearly every story,
           | followed by a commercial for neuropathy medicine.
           | 
           | I can't even begin to imagine how one can have a positive
           | reaction to that gruel.
        
           | UncleOxidant wrote:
           | I was just listening to On Point they were talking about
           | music's effect on physical health (heart rate, blood
           | pressure, inflammation, etc)
        
       | slillibri wrote:
       | I think the closest thing to live audio I listen to is the lofi
       | girl channel on youtube, and even then I'm not really listening
       | as it's more just on in the background. Otherwise I have my own
       | music that I listen to.
        
       | ynac wrote:
       | Free-form radio is still alive and well. https://wfmu.org is a
       | monster in the field as well as a leader in live radio
       | innovation. Their live commenting, archive, and multi-headed
       | station broadcasts, are all remarkable achievements in both
       | technology and community building. I'll give a shout for my two
       | favorite shows, but there are dozens worth tuning in for:
       | 
       | Serious Moonlight Sonatas - https://www.wfmu.org/playlists/MJ
       | 
       | Techtonic - https://www.wfmu.org/playlists/TD
       | 
       | And a bonus: Radio Ravioli - https://www.wfmu.org/playlists/OB
       | 
       | WFMO out of Tuft's has some great stuff as do MANY Northeast
       | colleges.
       | 
       | Even tiny schools like KUPS have some interesting shows.
       | 
       | The days of WBCN from the 60s-70s will be missed (if they are
       | gone), but there's no reason why these things can't happen again.
       | It isn't like there aren't great things to share and talk about
       | it.
        
       | jauntywundrkind wrote:
       | I find it distressing how centrist streaming services are.
       | Whatever seed I ask for, there's like 60 bands that are very
       | likely to populate half the generated playlist.
       | 
       | Most commercial radio is very boring & normative. But gee there
       | are so many stations out there that are independent or community
       | run, where people are out there with interesting vibes & picking
       | select music styles to play. So many stations that try to
       | increase exposure. Which is so unlike what I find on streaming
       | services.
       | 
       | I also deeply miss shoutcast being a vibrant place. Chromewaves
       | Radio had amazing surf/punk vibes. Amazing reggae and electronica
       | stations galore. There's still some life yes, but it's a mere
       | glimmer of what it was.
        
         | nradov wrote:
         | Use Pandora in discovery mode, and add variety to the station
         | with multiple artists. You'll probably find something new that
         | you like.
        
       | onetokeoverthe wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | seydor wrote:
       | I miss radio streams though. there's value to the idea that
       | thousands of others are listening to the same thing in realtime.
       | Damn those personalized streams, i dont want to listen to music
       | alone
        
         | irrational wrote:
         | But, how do you know that anyone else was ever listening to the
         | same thing in realtime? Maybe you were the only one every time.
         | Unlikely, but possible. I honestly don't see the difference. If
         | it makes you feel better, try pretending in your mind that
         | thousands of other people are listening to your personalized
         | streams in realtime. Functionally it is the same thing.
        
           | seydor wrote:
           | You re probably not old enough to remember radio
        
             | jhoechtl wrote:
             | Which phrased that way sounds as if radio would be dead.
        
         | squeaky-clean wrote:
         | I like the Apple Music radio stations for this reason. Not the
         | personalized stations, they have 3 live stations: Hits (generic
         | pop), 1 (modern pop), and Country (obviously country).
        
         | Fricken wrote:
         | I love tuning in to whatever local station I can find while
         | road tripping through some obscure part of the country. With
         | radio I feel connected. Isn't that supposed to be a big part of
         | what music is about? I'll go to any live show at a bar, it
         | doesn't even have to be that good or my kind of music for me to
         | appreciate it.
        
           | boomboomsubban wrote:
           | As someone who lives in an obscure part of the country,
           | almost all of our radio stations come out of the same
           | building which has maybe one actual on-air personality for
           | the ~7 stations broadcasting. What makes our stations "local"
           | is the extensive advertising.
        
         | rascul wrote:
         | I don't miss the ads. Every time I listen to the radio it seems
         | like there's 10 minutes of ads for 5 minutes of music. I know
         | that's not actually the case but it doesn't usually take me
         | long to find something else that doesn't have so many ads.
        
         | fasterik wrote:
         | I think the main advantage of radio for music is human
         | curation. Spotify is still far from being able to give me a
         | high quality playlist of music I'm likely to enjoy but would be
         | unlikely to find on my own. However, podcasts and DJ mixes
         | mostly fill this role for me. Internet radio still exists (KEXP
         | is great) but I don't find myself using it much anymore.
         | 
         | For the live element, it seems like Twitch streaming still has
         | a lot of potential if they can figure out the copyright issues.
         | 
         | For conversations and news, I think a well edited long-form
         | podcast is superior to radio in every way.
        
         | channel_t wrote:
         | Yeah it's funny, after what feels like at least a solid decade
         | of on-demand audio I'm finding myself seeking out more live
         | audio wherever I can find it. Miss the feeling of at least
         | passively participating in something. I think the isolation of
         | the pandemic kicked some of that into gear.
        
           | autoexec wrote:
           | I guess I can understand the desire to be a part of
           | something, but I can't see that feeling ever driving me back
           | into the clutches of the commercial FM/satellite radio. I
           | think I'd rather track down some popular pirate streamer or
           | better yet just start going to concerts.
        
         | darkclouds wrote:
         | I'd rather have been at Glastonbury listening to this
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POTjcZGLKuY for the whole
         | immersive crowd vibe, but watching it on TV wasnt bad.
         | 
         | I prefer Norman's sampling and MC'ing to David Guetta's.
         | 
         | Armin still does live streams all these years later!
         | https://www.youtube.com/@arminvanbuuren/streams
         | 
         | And the BBC Essential mix
         | https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006wkfp is now streamed
         | online around the world every Friday night and thats been going
         | since 30 October 1993 via the radio!!!
        
           | jjulius wrote:
           | Funny, I've been listening to Essential Mixes since the late
           | 90's and I don't think I've ever listened to them 'live'.
        
           | canadianfella wrote:
           | [dead]
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | nullandvoid wrote:
       | I'm a fan of garden radio for anyone who hasn't used, always fun
       | to tune in to radio stations from other side of the world.
        
       | jhoechtl wrote:
       | I love radio
        
       | MisterBastahrd wrote:
       | There's an interesting court case happening in Dallas right now
       | between two former radio hosts and their former employer.
       | Basically, the hosts were unsatisfied that they didn't own their
       | own material and that they couldn't get corporate to bump the pay
       | of the producers and board operators who helped make their show
       | work. So they proposed a solution where they would record
       | additional content in the form of a podcast and use a
       | subscription to that material to pay these other guys more money.
       | While the hosts were slated to make ~$250K each for 3 hours of
       | airtime a day, producers usually make around $35K, and board ops
       | less.
       | 
       | The corporate side said no, and thus the hosts resigned. This
       | began the enforcement of a non-compete agreement that the hosts
       | thumbed their noses at, immediately starting up a podcast in the
       | same format as their radio show, with a similar name. They were
       | promptly sued for violation of the non-compete and currently have
       | a TRO until they have mediation next Monday. They had accumulated
       | around 4000 subscriptions at $6.90 a month in about a month's
       | time.
       | 
       | Twitter-adherent people might be familiar with one of their
       | lawyers Matt Bruenig, who is a socialist lawyer with a strong
       | internet presence and has been involving himself in NLRB related
       | matters since he was in college. He's a friend of one of the
       | hosts and is apparently using this as a test case to try to at
       | least limit what non-competes in the entertainment industry can
       | enforce. At one point, two of the drive-time show hosts went to
       | corporate and asked to have their current contracts rewritten to
       | have their contracts end at the same time as the proposed new
       | contract of these hosts. They were shot down. This will be
       | brought up in court as a strike against collective bargaining.
       | 
       | For example, it's standard in radio non-competes that you do not
       | broadcast within the listening area of your market for the
       | duration of the non-compete. The format and name of the show is
       | owned by the radio corp. And should you decide to negotiate with
       | any third party during the course of your contract or non-compete
       | for better pay, you are required under the terms of the contract
       | to disclose these to the company because they have the right of
       | first refusal. The argument of these hosts is that they are not
       | technically competing with the radio station because they took
       | their show online and do not release the show until late in the
       | evening after the station's unsyndicated content has run its
       | course.
       | 
       | The hosts claim that the non-compete is unfair. The station
       | claims that they've spent considerable money promoting the hosts
       | and would suffer financial injury if hosts could just roll off of
       | a contract and directly into a podcast. IMO they both have valid
       | points.
        
       | bwanab wrote:
       | I love on-demand, but I'll never stop listening to Radio Paradise
       | - at least while Bill is still around. They've got better taste
       | in music than I can ever come up with.
        
         | yndoendo wrote:
         | My GOTO for steaming too.
        
         | block_dagger wrote:
         | Bill will have a superior AI version.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-25 23:02 UTC)