[HN Gopher] How to parent more predictably (2018)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to parent more predictably (2018)
        
       Author : yamrzou
       Score  : 71 points
       Date   : 2023-08-13 07:37 UTC (15 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.jefftk.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.jefftk.com)
        
       | keiferski wrote:
       | Can anyone recommend parenting books that are either from other
       | cultures or from a long time ago? When I read articles like this,
       | I nod along and agree that it all seems rational. But then I get
       | a creeping feeling that all this over-optimization is a trait of
       | contemporary Western culture and not necessarily the "best"
       | advice for raising healthy kids, whatever _best_ is supposed to
       | mean. (I'm not sure.)
       | 
       | I think it would be insightful to read parenting advice from
       | different cultures and eras and think about it from first
       | principles.
        
         | throw0101a wrote:
         | Perhaps:
         | 
         | * https://old.reddit.com/r/Parenting/wiki/recommended_reading
        
           | keiferski wrote:
           | This all seems pretty recent and by American authors. I'm
           | asking for more of: how do Indian/Chinese/Japanese/Mexican
           | parents raise their kids? How did 19th-century American
           | parents raise their kids? And so on.
        
             | kdamica wrote:
             | You might be interested in Hunter, Gather, Parent.
        
               | keiferski wrote:
               | I will check that out, thank you
        
         | acid_dog wrote:
         | The Anthropology of Childhood might be interesting to you:
         | https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/anthropology...
         | 
         | As well as this article: https://aeon.co/essays/why-runa-
         | indigenous-people-find-natur... (Amazonian childcare)
        
         | mbro1985 wrote:
         | This isn't really a parenting book, but rather an analysis of
         | parenting advice from different cultures & eras, and their
         | outcomes: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/29101505 I
         | enjoyed it particularly for its critique of modern Western
         | parenting.
        
           | keiferski wrote:
           | Thanks, this looks insightful.
        
         | andrepd wrote:
         | I sympathise with the sentiment, but I would still prefer to
         | take advice from scientists and psychologists and doctors, than
         | absorb fucked-up value systems from yore.
        
           | keiferski wrote:
           | _Thinking from first principles_ is the opposite of
           | "absorbing" ideas.
        
         | turnsout wrote:
         | I don't think there's any reason to believe other cultures or
         | time periods had parenting more figured out than us... But I do
         | believe in a first principles approach. Basically, be good to
         | your kid, use natural consequences instead of punishment and
         | rewards, and model the behavior you want to see.
         | 
         | If you're curious about that approach, check out RIE parenting
         | or Respectful Parenting.
        
         | makeitdouble wrote:
         | How much do you enjoy coaching books ?
         | 
         | We have pletora of business and self-help books, a ton of them
         | are about management, and we're talking about adults being
         | litteraly paid to be there getting managed. If you see
         | tremendous value in these current books, I'd argue reading
         | current parenting books will be of the same quality.
         | 
         | If you're looking for older books to compare, wouldn't any
         | "best seller" book be a good comparison point on what was seen
         | as acceptetable advice at the time ?
        
         | bythreads wrote:
         | Danish: https://via-ritzau-
         | dk.translate.goog/pressemeddelelse/nordis...
        
         | watwut wrote:
         | It is also worth checking _actual_ stats for those other
         | periods and cultures. Things like violence rates, youth
         | criminality issues, alcohol abuse by minors and so on. People
         | often idealized past, but when you check above, you fairly
         | often find out current kids are not all that bad.
         | 
         | In my culture, kids used to be beaten a lot. So did women, for
         | that matter. And guys getting into drunk fight with nearby
         | village were also something fairly normal. It is improvement
         | that all three happen less nowadays.
        
       | yonatan8070 wrote:
       | Reading the title I clicked this hoping to read an interesting
       | code related blog post... I was disappointed
        
       | twodave wrote:
       | The thing about parenting advice is it's usually just tailored to
       | whatever worked for some random person's kids. What if you (as my
       | wife and I have) adopted 4 kids over the course of 8 years, all
       | with FASD who are all insane in different ways? We have had to
       | learn 4 radically different approaches to parenting.
       | 
       | Our key has been understanding the needs (emotional, mental
       | health, etc.) of each child and accommodating those needs. I
       | think this translates to normal parents and their biological
       | children, though maybe the needs aren't so severe. Some specific
       | ways this has played out for us:
       | 
       | - for our kid who needs to understand "why" she can't do what she
       | wants or else has a panic attack, we have had to spend an
       | inordinate amount of time explaining our philosophy of parenting.
       | Sometimes this means "opening her eyes" with some information
       | that is probably a bit mature for the typical kid her age, but
       | for her that's outweighed by understanding our good intentions
       | for her better.
       | 
       | - for the super needy one who stuffs her emotions and ends up
       | having migraines and puking everywhere when she's not doing well,
       | this meant spending a lot of money on a mental health specialist
       | to figure out her exact needs, experimenting with basically all
       | aspects of her life and tuning things over time. We spend about
       | half an hour with this one every evening just talking about her
       | feelings, making her feel heard and nothing else.
       | 
       | - kid #3 has the most severe case of FASD but is probably the
       | most emotionally healthy of the bunch. For him we just have to
       | accommodate his education and development in a way that keeps him
       | confident and develop some "key words" when we want him to adjust
       | his behavior. E.g. when I need him to stop joking around, which
       | is all the time (haha), I tell him to "lock it up," and he knows
       | what that means.
       | 
       | - #4 had 4 other homes before coming to us, so he has always had
       | abandonment issues. He doesn't remember any of it, but it's part
       | of him. As a result he tends to want to be more self-reliant and
       | he doesn't deal with big changes very well. When we still needed
       | outside help he would have difficulty anytime we changed nannies.
       | For him this meant we just really needed to reinforce his concept
       | of family, remind him we won't ever leave, etc. And then also let
       | him do things for himself since that's where his confidence comes
       | from.
       | 
       | Those are just some examples. And as kids grow their needs
       | change. In my experience parenting is not a set of steps or a
       | magic formula. It is time invested in knowing your children's
       | needs (whatever those are) and helping them reach their full
       | potential (whatever that is). It's trial and error. It's
       | sacrifice.
        
       | jefftk wrote:
       | Rereading this post 5 years later and with now a third child (2y)
       | it's pretty close to what I would write today.
        
       | spicyusername wrote:
       | Another thing that's worked well for my children is using
       | positive reinforcement in as many stations as possible. The
       | carrot, not the stick.
       | 
       | If you do X, you'll be rewarded with Y.
       | 
       | vs
       | 
       | If you don't do X, you'll be punished with Z.
       | 
       | Kids, even young ones, are pretty smart. In most situations
       | simply being reasonable, consistent, and explaining your
       | rationale goes a long way.
       | 
       | "You can't watch more TV because doctors have said X hours are
       | the maximum healthy amount."
       | 
       | "If we start another game before cleaning the other one up, the
       | house will be too messy and it's unfair for Mom and Dad to do all
       | the cleaning for messes we didn't make"
        
       | kashunstva wrote:
       | The three skills presented here are useful and deal strictly with
       | shaping behaviour. I would add some random personal observations:
       | 1) Being more predictable also involves being more available and
       | predictable about trying to understand the seemingly wildly
       | fluctuating emotions to which kids are prone. So I'd argue that
       | predictably "seeking first to understand then be understood" is a
       | way of building empathy and trust. 2) What works at one stage of
       | life doesn't necessarily work at another. Teens, for example,
       | have much more complex lives and the levers you can pull are
       | different. 3) Where possible predictably offering choice builds a
       | sense of agency and self-efficacy. 4) The author acknowledges
       | that socioeconomic disadvantage can cause this to go off the
       | rails. To that I would just say there are 1001 ways it can fall
       | apart. Child with mental health issues. Parent with health
       | issues. Any life changes. Fortunately, kids are pretty resilient
       | if they have one or more trusted adults in their lives who are
       | empathic , caring and reasonably predictable.
        
       | sambeau wrote:
       | My most valuable piece of advice for parents is to keep your
       | children informed about your plans for the day, especially things
       | about to happen soon, and bear in mind that kids have their own
       | plans and time schedules (and don't wear watches).
       | 
       | For instance, if you are about to go out, give them fair warning
       | and a few reminders. Especially the all-important: if you need to
       | save your game, you need to do it now.
       | 
       | Similarly, if kids are taking turns with toys, your kid might be
       | patiently waiting their turn. To be suddenly yanked away before
       | their turn will, quite rightly, feel like an injustice. I used to
       | tell them all that if its someone's turn coming up that they
       | should get to have it before we leave. Kids are usually fair in
       | these circumstances.
       | 
       | These simple rules meant my kids never had leaving tantrums, and
       | rarely had tantrums at all.
        
         | marklubi wrote:
         | I would follow on with advice that if you tell them, "we're
         | leaving in 10 minutes" make sure that it happens in ten
         | minutes.
         | 
         | I've seen so many other parents set expectations, and then
         | ignore them. It sets a bad precedent that is left open to
         | interpretation and conflict.
        
         | ZephyrBlu wrote:
         | I feel like if we treated kids a little bit more like adults,
         | things would be much better. These reactions are pretty
         | reasonable relatively speaking, kids are just not quite as
         | adept at navigating reality as adults are. With a little help
         | they can be pretty good though.
        
           | makeitdouble wrote:
           | Yes and no. I think we should at least treat them as
           | intelligent beings and give them enough information to
           | understand the world around them.
           | 
           | "As adults" though is super difficult to balance. They'll
           | still do illogical things (you can explain its cold outside
           | and they need a coat, they'll still get out in t-shirt) and
           | need a ton of flexibility. It's kinda hard to square that
           | they have a brain but don't use it the same way when looking
           | at them in terms of "partially adults". My mental image is of
           | aliens learning about our society.
        
             | aaomidi wrote:
             | If they're cold they'll learn and not do it in the future.
             | 
             | Honestly the consequences of some actions are so basic,
             | just let them see how it goes imo
        
               | makeitdouble wrote:
               | Spoiler: they don't learn until some point, when they
               | become able to project themselves in the future and act
               | accordingly.
               | 
               | Many basic assumptions just don't work until their brain
               | evolves past specific points.
               | 
               | Some research around the subject: https://www.sciencedire
               | ct.com/science/article/abs/pii/S08852...
               | 
               | [edited for clarity]
        
               | watwut wrote:
               | Yeah, they don't. They will be cold again and again and
               | show Pikachu face again and again. It changes from
               | certain age, but that is much higher age.
        
           | andrepd wrote:
           | Oh absolutely. One of the lessons of e.g. Montessori
           | education is that treating kids as grownups will lead to them
           | acting as grownups.
        
         | watwut wrote:
         | I found out the same thing. There were still tamptrums with
         | mine, but significantly less of them.
         | 
         | However, when they know we leave in 10 minutes, they expect
         | that and leaving is easy. And thinking about it, even adults
         | get angry if you demand they do something RIGHT NOW at random
         | moment. Even adults want to know in advance, finish youtube
         | video or page of the book.
        
           | swader999 wrote:
           | This is the only way we could ever leave a playground.
        
       | laserlight wrote:
       | > Similarly, don't make commitments unnecessarily. Instead of
       | "I'll go downstairs and get your bear" maybe "I'll go downstairs
       | and look for your bear." While with adults we understand that
       | when a person says they'll do something they mean they'll put in
       | a reasonable effort and may fail if the task is surprisingly
       | difficult or if factors outside their control intervene, [...]
       | 
       | I'm not sure adults understand it either. Many times, I've seen
       | managers calling out a team member for not delivering by the time
       | that they told they would. So, I started to add a caveat to
       | almost everything I say about the future: "I plan to [...]".
        
         | jiggawatts wrote:
         | This is underrated advice. More than once, my spouse has
         | promised my son something as we're about to leave that I can't
         | deliver, guaranteeing a tantrum or at least some level of
         | having to drag him along while he's sulking and disappointed in
         | me.
         | 
         | The new family rule is: Don't promise the kid something you
         | won't personally deliver for certain! Which means, don't
         | promise anything on behalf of anyone else, even if that other
         | person is well-meaning.
        
       | lordnacho wrote:
       | The problem I have with a lot of parenting advice is it's always
       | written by someone with fewer than 30 kids.
       | 
       | Now I'm not saying you don't have a right to say anything until
       | you have enough kids to fill a bus, far from it.
       | 
       | But the advice you get is always variations of the same. Try to
       | be patient, try to be reasonable. If you need to make threats,
       | have it escalate slowly. Follow through on consequences.
       | 
       | This works for most people, because if you have under 30 kids,
       | you have a good chance of never getting a kid who is on the 1%
       | level of difficulty (Rule of 1/3n).
       | 
       | In fact my first kid was normal in that sense. Ask him to do
       | something, he does it eventually. Not too many issues. Patience
       | and reason prevailed, I didn't even have to make a lot of threats
       | before he just got it. At that point perhaps I should have
       | written a book about parenting, because it was working great.
       | 
       | Second kid, no. It's not that the kid doesn't understand the
       | trade: clean up first, then get read to. It's that the kid
       | objects to the very idea that there's a deal. I'm being
       | unreasonable in presenting this Faustian trade, no kid should be
       | held prisoner until they unwillingly clean up after themselves!
       | Consequences? Sure, try to hold to the things you said. No
       | dinner, take away toys, stern voice, shouting.
       | 
       | Nothing helps. I can't be the only parent who has tried all the
       | variations of "be reasonable". But that's also where the advice
       | ends. I guess in programming we have the same problem: you've
       | seemingly looked everywhere for the error, now you have no ideas
       | left, but the problem is still there.
        
         | endymi0n wrote:
         | My experience has been that it still has paid off to stay
         | consistent. My youngest one is also extremely stubborn with a
         | rage issue (I wouldn't dare to say 1% but at least 5%), and I
         | can't count the time outs I've had to distribute. All of them
         | as a consequence with advance warning. Partially it was
         | borderline violent, but I've always did my very best to only
         | use as much force to not hurt her, but just keep her from
         | hurting herself and others as well as escaping the isolation
         | from stimuli (I've always stayed with her the entire time). One
         | time I carried her screaming and shouting through a whole
         | restaurant of people and stayed a whopping 20 minutes in front
         | of the door until she was calm and my food was cold.
         | 
         | At the time, it looked like no progress at all, but fast
         | forward 4 years and she's 7 now, well behaved, thoughtful, but
         | still confident and strong willed: the upside of stubbornness.
         | I feel like we did a decent job there.
        
         | The_Colonel wrote:
         | It seems quite reasonable to write advice for handling 97% of
         | kids.
         | 
         | If your kid belongs to those other 3%, you likely need a more
         | specialized book.
        
         | ZephyrBlu wrote:
         | LOL I feel like me and my siblings were all the second kid.
         | We're all very stubborn.
         | 
         | Dealing with an unreasonable child is very difficult because
         | the consequences mean nothing. You take away all their stuff
         | and it's just fuel to continue stubbornly disobeying, if you
         | say "no dinner" they will just not eat, etc.
         | 
         | My unsubstantiated opinion is that you probably have to wait
         | them out and not give them too much attention. Taking away more
         | things doesn't really work.
        
         | jefftk wrote:
         | _> always written by someone with fewer than 30 kids_
         | 
         | And even if you got a book written by someone who'd had 30
         | kids, their experience is (if they have their own kids with the
         | same partner) 30 draws from the same genetic distribution and
         | still won't transfer all that well to randomly selected
         | children.
        
           | lordnacho wrote:
           | Not to mention, the people who need the advice are not going
           | to be selected from the general population.
        
         | iteria wrote:
         | I think I have a high difficulty child. My kid has ASD and whew
         | meltdowns and all that label entails.
         | 
         | I don't think that I had change my parent much, although the
         | results I got at first would be considered less than ideal. I
         | agree that consistency is key. My kid wails, screams, and more,
         | but eventually she does come to understand that her actions
         | have zero impact on the rules. The rules are what they are.
         | 
         | I also don't have a lot of rules I'll be honest. I really only
         | have 3 core rules and all the rules she gets are all
         | enforcement of those rules. The rules are 1) don't impede my
         | ability to keep you healthy and safe 2) you must be able to
         | operate and be productive within your slice of society 3) you
         | are not allowed to be a direct or indirect physical, mental, or
         | emotional danger to yourself or others. That's it.
         | 
         | They seems vague and they're probably abusable, but it gives me
         | a compassion go operate from. It allows me to let things go.
         | There are many things I wish my kid would do, but ultimately
         | when I check The Rules, I find she's not really in violation of
         | breaking anything but my dreams for her or my preference for
         | how I personally want her to live.
         | 
         | I think this ideal makes me both a strict and lax parent, but I
         | like the results I'm seeing now. It was a long hard battle at
         | the toddler years, but she's mostly accepted how it goes I
         | think because she can know how it will go.
         | 
         | I'm come to believe that having core values and being
         | consistent about their enforcement is the way to deal with
         | kids. As long as you aren't too oppressive and they have some
         | space to act as they please, I think you can eventually get to
         | a good state. I guess we'll see how right I am in a decade lol
        
         | pineaux wrote:
         | [flagged]
        
           | ZephyrBlu wrote:
           | You would really beat your kid over something as small as not
           | cleaning up after themselves? Maybe they would start
           | listening to you, but only because they fear you.
           | 
           | Personally, when I have kids I want them to respect me, not
           | fear me.
        
             | jefftk wrote:
             | (author)
             | 
             | I'm not in favor of physical punishment, but I don't think
             | "as small as" is a good way to think about it. You're
             | teaching them a general pattern (varies by parent, but
             | perhaps "when I require you to do something you have to do
             | it").
             | 
             | If they learn that if they refuse strongly you will just
             | drop it, you'll get a lot of that.
             | 
             | This is how it works for adults too: if you are involved
             | with the legal system on a minor matter, and then start
             | disregarding the courts requirements ("contempt of court")
             | they will escalate this quite far, up to jail time.
             | 
             | This is also worth thinking through before you make a
             | demand of your kid: is this really something that you are
             | willing to enforce? Is it that important? Can you start
             | with something weaker than a demand and talk about it
             | first? ("Your room is really messy and I'm having trouble
             | getting to the dresser to put your clothes away.")
        
               | ZephyrBlu wrote:
               | My point was that physical violence is a severe
               | punishment and not cleaning up after yourself does not
               | seem like it warrants such a severe punishment.
               | 
               | I don't think that forever escalating punishment is an
               | effective strategy. If your child won't listen to you
               | after punishment one step below physical violence, going
               | further probably isn't going to help. Continually
               | escalating the situation to enforce something feels like
               | a very one dimensional approach.
               | 
               | It seems like you agree with me, given that in your
               | article your said "even better, though, is avoiding
               | commands and threats entirely".
               | 
               | Sidenote: I really hate "when I require you to do
               | something you have to do it" as a reason. Always hated it
               | as a kid, still hate it as an adult. I hope I only use it
               | very sparingly when I have children.
        
               | jefftk wrote:
               | (I'm not sure we disagree very much on what to do, but
               | mostly on how we think about it?)
               | 
               |  _> My point was that physical violence is a severe
               | punishment and not cleaning up after yourself does not
               | seem like it warrants such a severe punishment._
               | 
               | I understood that to be your point when I wrote my
               | response, fwiw.
               | 
               |  _> If your child won 't listen to you after punishment
               | one step below physical violence, going further probably
               | isn't going to help._
               | 
               | Maybe your objection to physical punishment isn't "it is
               | too harsh a punishment for refusing to clean up" but
               | instead "I don't think it will work"?
               | 
               |  _> I really hate  "when I require you to do something
               | you have to do it" as a reason. Always hated it as a kid,
               | still hate it as an adult. I hope I only use it very
               | sparingly when I have children._
               | 
               | Agreed! It is a a very large exercise of authority to
               | require someone to do something regardless of whether
               | they agree. So I rarely require the kids to clean up,
               | even though at this point my oldest is nine. Instead,
               | it's usually something like not being willing to help
               | them start something new until they have cleaned up what
               | they were already working on.
        
               | ZephyrBlu wrote:
               | > _Maybe your objection to physical punishment isn 't "it
               | is too harsh a punishment for refusing to clean up" but
               | instead "I don't think it will work"?_
               | 
               | Definitely both. I believe that it's ineffective, but
               | even if it was effective I wouldn't be inclined to use
               | it.
               | 
               | I feel like punishment in general is thought of as a very
               | one dimensional thing, but in reality people have much
               | more complex motivations.
               | 
               | You kind of get at that with "it's usually something like
               | not being willing to help them start something new until
               | they have cleaned up what they were already working on".
               | It's not really punishment, but it's still a motivator
               | for them to do the task.
               | 
               | I feel like you can teach kids the general pattern like
               | you mentioned without "punishing" them per se.
        
               | pineaux wrote:
               | Yes if you have a reasonable person in front of you. But
               | your children can be very unreasonable and cruel just
               | because they are playing. The "why" questions will just
               | continue until you are exhausted and they will not have
               | done it anyways. Also, "because I say so" is the truth
               | and the reason. "I say so because I want you to do it,
               | and I want you to do it because I say so. " Its a
               | chicken/egg problem
        
               | ZephyrBlu wrote:
               | I completely disagree with your approach. You don't win
               | against an unreasonable person by escalating the
               | punishment. They're unreasonable, by definition they're
               | not going to respond like a reasonable person would and
               | back down. It's just a poor strategy.
               | 
               | > _Also, "because I say so" is the truth and the reason_
               | 
               | I have understood that since I was a child. My point is
               | that it's an extremely poor reason. You are relying
               | entirely upon your authority as a parent/boss/whatever
               | and not providing any real rationale.
               | 
               | Relevant (Specifically "formal authority is a blunt,
               | fragile instrument"):
               | 
               |  _" As an engineer, if you really feel strongly about
               | something, you just go off and do it yourself. As a
               | manager, you have to lead through influence and
               | persuasion and inspiring other people to do things. It
               | can be quite frustrating. "But can't I just tell people
               | what to do?" you might be thinking. And the answer is no.
               | Any time you have to tell someone what to do using your
               | formal authority, you have failed in some way and your
               | actual influence and power will decrease. Formal
               | authority is a blunt, fragile instrument._"
               | 
               | https://charity.wtf/2019/09/08/reasons-not-to-be-a-
               | manager/
        
           | austinjp wrote:
           | Um, just no. Escalating punishment, and including physical
           | punishment, is a guaranteed way to induce extreme problems.
           | Prisons are packed with people who lived that life, listen to
           | some interviews. Breaking people leaves broken people who
           | break more people.
           | 
           | Note: I'm not saying punishments are a bad idea. But severity
           | as the variable to tweak, that's demonstrably a dreadful
           | plan.
        
             | pineaux wrote:
             | Sure, just throw your certainties in my face like the
             | truth. You name prisons, but you forget that until
             | recently, most children were subjected to physical violence
             | and most of them did not go to prison. But if you read the
             | above correctly you would understand that it is not about
             | breaking at all. On the contrary. It is about
             | proportionality and that is also the hard part. We are
             | physical beings, why should all punishment be executed on
             | the mind? Why is torture of the mind better? Is burden
             | someone up with a significant debt is not seen as torture,
             | but it is. So much so that some people commit suicide.
        
               | TheCoelacanth wrote:
               | They may not all have ended up in prison, but certainly
               | they, on average, went on to commit a much higher level
               | of violent crime.
               | 
               | Violent crimes of all types have trended downwards
               | steeply in the time since those types of punishments
               | stopped being accepted. We are well rid of them.
        
           | uoaei wrote:
           | The first paragraph is a great way to guarantee your child
           | with anarchist tendencies (read: recognizing power structures
           | for the inherently exploitative systems that they are)
           | definitely becomes an anarchist in the philisophically
           | rigorous sense, if they're not already too traumatized by
           | their experiences by the time they learn to reason about
           | these things well.
           | 
           | The second part is teaching the child to externalize value
           | systems so that they never develop healthy ones for
           | themselves.
           | 
           | I hope you are just speculating and don't really have kids.
        
             | uoaei wrote:
             | Maybe to clarify a positive point rather than leaving only
             | negative ones behind...
             | 
             | The thing about children is: they are already _people_ when
             | they exit the womb (i.e. agents, at least in the ways we
             | talk about LLMs today if not more than that), then they
             | become adults with more or less consistent modes of being
             | and acting, and then they get to exert their own influences
             | on the world (read: other people). The duty of a parent is
             | not to make their own lives easier or to assuage themselves
             | that they  "did everything right", but to create net-good
             | lasting change through their parental legacy, whatever the
             | cost to themselves. The choice to have a child has already
             | been made -- the rest is owning up to that choice.
             | 
             | Of course, what's "good" is a personal matter, but suffice
             | it to say that we can all agree that the good that is
             | created by parenting exists far past immediate vectors of
             | control and into the psyche of the child. So to treat
             | children as anything less than agents in and of themselves
             | is to instill in them a dangerously false ideology from the
             | very beginning that morphs into antisocial pathologies as
             | their belief systems and worldviews ossify in age. This
             | lesson can be impressed on them in myriad subtle and
             | apparently "correct" ways of parenting, in ways that the
             | parent believes are backed by only the best intentions, but
             | that ultimately harm the child and perpetuate their
             | capacity for harming others.
        
           | bythreads wrote:
           | Out of curiosity: is that legal in your neck of the woods?,
           | its a punishable offense over here.
        
         | camgunz wrote:
         | My partner read Hunt, Gather, Parent which is more or less
         | about getting kids to do chores and not yell all the time. It's
         | not not in the category of "miracle cure books", but the
         | general thesis of, "do chores together and don't paint them as
         | chores but things the family does together, try not to get
         | angry" seems relatively sane.
         | 
         | Our kid is ~6 mos. so it's not applicable now, and thus can't
         | give you practical experience. But yeah, 100% sympathy here.
         | Wading through parenting advice is just like, epistemologically
         | annihilating. Hang in there :)
        
         | martindbp wrote:
         | > I can't be the only parent who has tried all the variations
         | of "be reasonable".
         | 
         | You're not. It helps to get an assessment from experienced
         | preschool teachers, in our case, I asked out of the current
         | 100+ kids if there was anyone more stubborn/difficult and there
         | wasn't. The problem is most parents think their kid is
         | "difficult", so there is little understanding from them, and
         | definitely no understanding from 20-somethings who think it's
         | just bad parenting...
         | 
         | One example is the concept of "timeout", you mean that kids
         | simply accept this without escalating? When applied on my son
         | that would just lead to a series of escalations until he throws
         | up from crying too hard. Or he tries to leave the house and run
         | away leading to having to be physically constrained for his own
         | safety, leading to screaming until throwing up and loss of
         | voice for a few days. Thankfully he's since matured and is
         | quite well adapted, but ages 1-5 were rough.
        
         | wouldbecouldbe wrote:
         | Dealing with kids with special needs can be a challenge. And is
         | definitely a 1 out of 30 difficulty you are describing. I've
         | had "regular" kids, and special needs kids I took care off, the
         | difference of emotional energy needed to take care of them is
         | incomparable. Normal kids, feel as almost no work to me to be
         | honest.
         | 
         | They can have emotional moods of a 2-3 years old up till
         | teenage years.
         | 
         | The biggest thing to live a happy life, even just for yourself
         | is to not get emotional, best is to not even raise your voice.
         | Anger, even mild, is extremely draining to yourself. And makes
         | the kids feels terrible, even if they look blank to it,
         | creating a vicious cycle.
         | 
         | Leave expectations out of the door. Don't expect reciprocity.
         | Be extremely consistent, make sure you're schedule is
         | easygoing.
         | 
         | Steps of dealing with an emotional escapades:
         | 
         | 1. Get them out of the situation. Best is physically, but don't
         | do it agressively if possible. They get a chance to reset. Do
         | not ever correct kids in front of other kids.
         | 
         | 2. Acknowledge their feeling. Start with understanding.
         | 
         | 3. Explain why and how it's no acceptable. But don't tell them
         | they are wrong, focus on their behaviour; and give them an
         | acceptable way out.
         | 
         | 4. Only allow them to return to their wanted activity if they
         | act appropriately again. That can be in their room, timeout, at
         | times you have to get creative.
         | 
         | And also very important: get them out of stimulating situations
         | (such as parties or busy playgrounds) half an hour before they
         | normally would be overstimulated. When overstimulated, these
         | kids normally need 1 hour, till sleep time to fully get back to
         | normal.
        
         | public_defender wrote:
         | > fewer than 30 kids.
         | 
         | I agree. And I'll go you one further. I have kids. I also used
         | to work in a psychiatric hospital for kids, so I frequently had
         | 30 and most of them were in the bottom quartile on common "easy
         | to parent" metrics. On my first day a kid had found a lightbulb
         | and broken it. She was threatening to eat it. I was shadowing
         | someone and they sort of nudged me forward to see what I would
         | do. I said, "you'd better not eat that" in a pretty
         | authoritative tone. The kid responded, "or what?"
         | 
         | This was sort of a lightbulb moment for me. It's your first
         | hour on the job, and you've been presented with an "imposing of
         | consequences" dilemma. Your dilemma partner has threatened to
         | eat some broken glass. What result?
         | 
         | Anyway, I obviously didn't escalate with threats of
         | consequences, right? Or my username would be prosecutor. The
         | action:reaction, misbehavior:punishment model operates as
         | violence for some kids. Parenting has to be adaptive and
         | parents have to sort of ride the bronco and parent the kid who
         | shows up that day.
         | 
         | Unfortunately for you, nobody would probably publish a book
         | titled "sometimes you just have to clean the kid's room and
         | still read to them and there are different rules for the older
         | brother but that's all fine and good," but anecdotally that's
         | the truth.
         | 
         | Anyway your parenting experience sounds normal (in the sense
         | that it's normal for a parent to have an uncommonly
         | oppositional kid), so don't feel like you're doing anything
         | wrong. Good luck.
        
           | ZephyrBlu wrote:
           | Your story is really interesting because it highlights how
           | ineffective consequences can be if someone refuses to
           | cooperate.
           | 
           | I'm curious what you would consider the "correct" approach in
           | that kind of situation is?
        
             | public_defender wrote:
             | I'm not an academic, but I don't really think there is a
             | correct choice. I think there are strategies that work in
             | the moment to de-escalate. From among those, we often have
             | a choice of damnations regarding long-term goals (e.g.
             | "what will she learn from this if I..."). I think we are
             | often poor estimators of long-term impact, though.
        
           | WesolyKubeczek wrote:
           | So what did you do with that kid? The suspense is killing me.
        
             | public_defender wrote:
             | I had to walk back pretty quickly and save the credibility
             | I had. So I pivoted to something like "There is no 'or
             | else,' you'd just better not--as in it would really be
             | better if you did not. I think you'll be pretty sad and
             | miserable if you do that."
             | 
             | This turned out to be a step down the correct path, even if
             | pretty embarrassing in the moment. Someone with a better
             | relationship with the kid stepped in and used that
             | relationship to de-escalate, a la "please don't do that
             | because it will hurt you and I wouldn't like that because I
             | care about you."
             | 
             | What I found to be key in a situation like this was: (1)
             | focus on the person, not the behavior; (2) Have full
             | attention on the situation; (3) try to determine/address
             | root causes. It's obviously impossible to do all that stuff
             | in real life sometimes, but I can try.
        
         | uoaei wrote:
         | I've had parents, and enough therapy to know how they fucked me
         | up. I have friends who are in similar situations and who are
         | comfortable discussing such topics. Arguably this is a much
         | more productive way to develop a better perspective on how to
         | raise children than any given parent, whom we cannot guarantee
         | have the same kinds of insights.
         | 
         | I think it's a right view that parents don't trust the advice
         | of other parents proferred willy-nilly, but then apparently
         | desperate and exasperated parents see no other options and so
         | keep reaching for the same failing systems and directives that
         | float around in the zeitgeist. I suggest to look within, and
         | act through empathy.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | throw0101a wrote:
         | > _The problem I have with a lot of parenting advice is it 's
         | always written by someone with fewer than 30 kids._
         | 
         | William Sears, who has written numerous books, has eight kids
         | of his own, and is/was a practicing paediatrician:
         | 
         | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Sears_(physician)
         | 
         | > _But the advice you get is always variations of the same. Try
         | to be patient, try to be reasonable. If you need to make
         | threats, have it escalate slowly. Follow through on
         | consequences._
         | 
         | You may wish to look at the books/advice that a larger pool of
         | parents have found to be useful:
         | 
         | * https://old.reddit.com/r/Parenting/wiki/recommended_reading
        
       | jgalt212 wrote:
       | > mostly just my observations with my own two kids
       | 
       | I appreciate this line. Maybe right, maybe wrong, but I won't
       | take parenting advice from anyone with zero or one children.
        
         | spicyusername wrote:
         | I would say one child gets you the pass too.
        
           | jgalt212 wrote:
           | you can make that argument, but not sure many parents who
           | went from 1 to 2, or 2 to 3+ would agree with you. The game
           | changes--scarce resource allocation and sibling rivalry
           | (which is mostly a function of the former).
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | bawolff wrote:
       | I'm always amazed at how much parenting advice comes down to
       | "don't be an asshole to your children"
       | 
       | Like imagine if the article was about being a manager and had
       | advice like: follow through on promises you make to your direct
       | report. Everyone would respond, "no shit". Suddenly when it is
       | about children this is sage advice.
        
         | quickthrower2 wrote:
         | Yeah sounds easy until you have kids and it isn't. Imagine the
         | employee who like acts like a 5 year old all the time.
         | 
         | That is what looking after a 5 year old is like! The good,
         | beautiful, bad and ugly of that.
         | 
         | Now imagine you have the next shift is not 8 but 1.1million
         | hours.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-13 23:02 UTC)