[HN Gopher] SEC Charges Hex Founder Richard Heart with Misapprop...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       SEC Charges Hex Founder Richard Heart with Misappropriating
       Millions of Dollars
        
       Author : mfiguiere
       Score  : 158 points
       Date   : 2023-07-31 14:53 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.sec.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.sec.gov)
        
       | davidgerard wrote:
       | fun fact, Richard used to sell email spam software. Is shitcoin
       | pumping a step up or a step down?
       | 
       | Richard is a very charming fellow, very likable, but in a way
       | that cautions you not to let any of your money within a mile of
       | him.
        
         | Djle wrote:
         | Don't forget this article: '$HEX for the Financially
         | Illiterate' Explains exactly what the "Spam King" had moved
         | into: https://archive.ph/AjfcV
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | Charming??! I've known enough of his kind that his "charm"
         | immediately sets off all of my Malignant Narcissist Klaxons.
         | 
         | He's charming in the same sense that the creepy guy driving the
         | windowless "FREE CANDY" van is generous.
         | 
         | And you only mentioned the tip of the Spamberg -- it goes MUCH
         | deeper:
         | 
         | His real name is actually Richard J Schueler, under which he is
         | famously known as the "Spam King", for being one of the first
         | people in the world to be successfully sued for online spam,
         | specifically the Viagra spam scheme that he ran from Panama
         | (which he lost).
         | 
         | Richard Heart - Spam, ICOs, and Death Threats:
         | 
         | https://imnotdead.co.uk/blog/richard-heart
         | 
         | PSA: Crypto HEX Founder is Actually Notorious Criminal 'Spam
         | King':
         | 
         | https://blockcast.cc/news/psa-crypto-hex-founder-is-actually...
         | 
         | Richard James Schueler - Friggin Spam King:
         | 
         | https://web.archive.org/web/20190416235350/http://www.panama...
         | 
         | HEX Founder found to be Notorious Criminal:
         | 
         | https://cryptotraderspro.com/hex-founder-outed-spam-king/
         | 
         | Why HEX is a Ponzi and not a solid investment (Part 2): Richard
         | Heart:
         | 
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/kwhjxa/why_...
         | 
         | >During the interview at ANON, Richard confirmed that he was
         | one of the first people in the world to be sued for online
         | spam, back in 2002. This shows us Richard has experience
         | abusing unregulated markets, as he is doing with crypto these
         | days.
         | 
         | Hasn't the last eight or so years of Trump trained people to
         | instantly see through that kind of bullshit, and easily
         | recognize a malignant narcissist for what they are, or does he
         | specialize in fooling the same kind of people Trump still
         | fools?
         | 
         | What kind of person actually makes videos and web pages about
         | themself with titles like:
         | 
         | RICHARD HEART IS THE BEST PERSON EVER! I OWN THE WORLD'S
         | LARGEST DIAMOND.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TQGzltcKNk
         | 
         | Richard Heart is a force for good:
         | 
         | https://richardheart.com/
        
           | latchkey wrote:
           | Trump is spending $40m of his donations on a legal defense
           | fund, so I'm pretty sure the answer to your question is no.
           | 
           | https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-pac-spent-40m-legal-
           | bi...
        
       | thesausageking wrote:
       | The SEC is just the wrong organization to be enforcing laws in
       | crypto. This was a scam that was done out in the open and
       | launched 4 years ago. People conned into buying this have already
       | lost their money and they're not getting it back. The founder
       | will use some of the $1B+ he's made of it to defend himself in a
       | long, drawn out court case that the SEC will eventually settle.
       | 
       | The SEC's purpose is supposed to be to protect investors and no
       | one is being protected by this.
        
         | WorldMaker wrote:
         | If not the SEC then who?
         | 
         | It took decades before Bernie Madoff's crimes came to light
         | under SEC investigation (and then eventual criminal
         | prosecution). Most of his victims had already lost their money
         | and were never getting it back, even with the criminal suits
         | they eventually joined that was mostly to show justice to
         | Madoff not to recover lost funds.
         | 
         | From that perspective, 4 years is possibly a record in
         | speediness for scams of this scale. (Cryptocurrencies sure have
         | sped up the scams, but also seem to have greatly sped up the
         | investigations into the spams, perhaps in a way that some will
         | find ironic.)
         | 
         | The SEC can't protect all investors _a priori_ (ahead of time).
         | There 's always going to be a long tail of investigations into
         | past misdeeds and airing the dirty laundry. In theory the more
         | dirty laundry the SEC can air from previous misdeeds the more
         | it educates the public on things to look for and the more it
         | assures would-be scammers that _eventually_ they will be caught
         | and will have to face the American justice system. (Whether or
         | not you think the American justice system capable of doling out
         | enough criminal charges that stick to these sorts of
         | injustices, it is always still worth trying.)
        
         | martin8412 wrote:
         | You can't pay for your legal defense with illegal funds. Well,
         | you can, but the lawyers if not careful might be subject to
         | clawback and therefore not likely to defend you.
        
         | paulpauper wrote:
         | the sec also does not bring criminal investigation, only refer.
         | it's not even that effective as a deterrent. only jail stops
         | criminals, not lawsuits.
        
       | bhouston wrote:
       | Thank god, that guy was incredibly obnoxious.
        
         | rlt wrote:
         | Among other crimes against humanity is his incredibly gaudy
         | sense of style
         | 
         | https://twitter.com/RichardHeartWin/status/15402954048178831...
         | 
         | https://sybershel.com/he-invented-the-crypto-that-gives-inte...
        
           | codyb wrote:
           | Wow imagine spending 80,000 dollars to look that bad.
        
           | artursapek wrote:
           | This guy was famous for posting these photos flaunting how
           | much money he was wearing. It blows my mind to think someone
           | could be this open about doing this
        
             | Terr_ wrote:
             | When it comes to both scams and investing, sometimes a kind
             | of ancient "look at me I'm _obviously_ wealthy and
             | successful, so clearly you should treat me favorably and
             | maybe link your fortune to mine " thing going on.
             | 
             | > It was quite a crash, Nakamura Lines. Respectable middle-
             | aged businessmen took to leaving their hotel windows
             | without their lift belts. Me, I kept spending. If I'd
             | started living frugally, my creditors would have done some
             | checking... and I'd have ended in debtor's prison.
             | 
             | -- _Neutron Star_ by Larry Niven
        
               | WorldMaker wrote:
               | Relatedly, the bizarre "Prosperity Gospel" thing where
               | preachers of a religion ostensibly following a teacher
               | who believed that you should give all your money to the
               | poor (and be sure to toss all the bankers lending money
               | out of your church while you are at it) spend incredible
               | amounts of money on fashion and private jets and
               | expensive homes in some religious message that spiritual
               | wealth is "trickle-down".
        
             | ChainOfFools wrote:
             | I knew this guy from before he was a major league crypto
             | scammer. I assure you although part of this is actual lack
             | of taste, he is quite conscious of how he looks and
             | intentionally turns the tackiness and gaudiness up to 11
             | even beyond his own sensibilities. It is a filter, designed
             | to screen out people who might have enough common sense the
             | question the legitimacy of his claims.
        
             | mrguyorama wrote:
             | You can rent a fancy car, take a selfie with it, post it on
             | instagram saying "DM me for a ONCE IN A LIFETIME
             | investment" and take home $100k no problem. Some people
             | have no idea how money works.
        
             | conductr wrote:
             | It blows my mind people invest money with a guy doing this
             | so openly
        
               | codyb wrote:
               | I feel like it's fairly common for scammers to show off a
               | fabulously wealthy lifestyle real or imagined.
               | 
               | For some people it makes them think "whose money did they
               | spend to get all that?" and for others it makes them
               | thing "if I give them my money to invest too soon I'll be
               | on the plane"
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | You can say that again. A total narcissist scammer of the worst
         | kind. He started with Viagra spam and then found crypto
         | shilling. He liked to hang out on HN to shill his scams and
         | recruit developers, but I may have accidentally made him feel
         | uncomfortable by asking him lots of pointed questions about his
         | past, and he hasn't shown his face in a while. His go-to
         | response is literally "Dodge, dodge!"
         | 
         | His real name is actually Richard J Schueler, under which he is
         | famously known as the "Spam King", for being one of the first
         | people in the world to be successfully sued for online spam,
         | specifically the Viagra spam scheme that he ran from Panama
         | (which he lost).
         | 
         | Richard Hart (aka "Spam King" Richard J Schueler) wins the
         | "Golden Pump Award" for "Best New Scam" for his POS shitcoin
         | Ponzi scheme "HEX":
         | 
         | https://twitter.com/JuanSGalt/status/1233242355995750400
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=857&v=tf-lJu5iDh...
         | 
         | Peacefire.org beats spammers in court.
         | 
         | https://www.zdnet.com/article/peacefire-org-beats-spammers-i...
         | 
         | >Free-speech group Peacefire.org wins a legal round in its
         | fight against unsolicited e-mail, invoking Washington state's
         | anti-spam law.
         | 
         | >The King County District Court in Bellevue, Wash., on Monday
         | granted Peacefire $1,000 in damages in each of three complaints
         | filed by Peacefire Webmaster Bennett Haselton. The small-claims
         | suit alleged that Red Moss Media, Paulann Allison and Richard
         | Schueler [who now operates under the pseudonum "Richard Hart"]
         | sent unsolicited commercial messages to Haselton that bore
         | deceptive information such as a forged return e-mail address or
         | misleading subject line.
         | 
         | More embarrassing facts and proof he doesn't want you to read
         | here:
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36944841
        
           | Scoundreller wrote:
           | Given the difficulties in payments when it comes to gray-
           | market dick pills, I'm surprised he wasn't an early bitcoin
           | whale and made more than enough from that to just retire.
        
       | confoundcofound wrote:
       | The biggest lie in crypto is that tokens are bought for utility
       | and not speculative gains. I don't know if it's delusion or
       | intentional deception. I have friends who are "thought leaders"
       | in the space, who opine on the disruptive potential of crypto yet
       | spend their days tweeting about the latest memecoin that just
       | 100x'd.
       | 
       | The entire concept of crypto "value" rests upon the marriage of
       | token utility and economic value. Financial gain is baked into
       | the mechanic. And between the two, people care far more about
       | financial gain. It's a fundamental misalignment of incentives.
        
         | verteu wrote:
         | > The biggest lie in crypto is that tokens are bought for
         | utility and not speculative gains. I don't know if it's
         | delusion or intentional deception.
         | 
         | It's an attempt to avoid the scope of US securities law:
         | https://www.taftlaw.com/news-events/law-bulletins/utility-to...
        
         | spaceman_2020 wrote:
         | Ironically, the only tokens with any actual utility have stable
         | prices - stablecoins.
        
         | Pixie_Dust wrote:
         | [flagged]
        
         | dboreham wrote:
         | To be fair the same thing happens in the regular world. e.g.
         | look at a list of the richest people in the USA and see how
         | they made their money.
        
           | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
           | All of the 10 richest people in the US, with the exception of
           | Warren Buffett (and even that I wouldn't really call an
           | exception, more on that below), built real businesses with
           | real products that are used by millions of people and
           | companies. I think wealth inequality is a major problem of
           | our time but I despise this painting everything with a
           | (factually incorrect) bad brush.
           | 
           | Re: Buffett is the only "pure investor" in the top 10, but
           | even then Berkshire Hathaway is pretty famous for having a
           | portfolio of some of the best managed companies in the
           | business. It's not like Buffet is a day trader.
        
           | mikeyouse wrote:
           | Elon, Bezos, Bill Gates, Ellison, Buffet, Paige, Brin,
           | Ballmer, Bloomberg, Walton --- which of those
           | billion/trillion dollar companies do you think in any way
           | compares to the shambolic crypto world?
        
             | fnimick wrote:
             | I mean, we joke that Oracle is a legal company with an
             | engineering department... but at least they _build_ things.
        
               | mikeyouse wrote:
               | Right. I don't like most of the people on that list and
               | e.g. Oracle is a mess of a company that is actively
               | hostile to the software world -- but they still sold $42
               | billion worth of goods/services to willing customers last
               | year. Nothing at all like crypto trading.
        
           | mgraczyk wrote:
           | The 20 richest people in the USA all make their wealth via
           | profitable companies that have returned value to
           | shareholders.
        
           | confoundcofound wrote:
           | My problem is with the collective gaslighting the crypto
           | industry is doing with respects to utility vs speculation. I
           | never thought I would find myself on the side of the SEC, but
           | I have enough experience in the space with investors to
           | builders to confidently say the vast majority of the industry
           | is about speculative gain. Specious claims of utility are
           | often just a means to that end.
        
       | boeingUH60 wrote:
       | He raised over $1 billion?!...there was really too much money
       | floating around begging for where to invest circa 2020. The same
       | goes for many questionable startups that raised money.
       | 
       | Notice how these schemes have disappeared in tough times.
        
         | delusional wrote:
         | $1 billion in crypto, so not real money. $1 billion on IOU's
         | from some other ponzi scheme. Right after it states that
         | they're also charged "misappropriating at least $12 million of
         | offering proceeds" which seems like a more reasonable figure.
         | They probably stole in the order of $12-20 million.
        
           | iancarroll wrote:
           | The article mentions at least 2 million Ethereum, which is
           | certainly liquid enough to be a couple orders of magnitude
           | above $10 million.
        
             | Retric wrote:
             | There's a fair amount of liquidity, but trying to withdraw
             | 1 billion in Eth is going to impact it's valuation.
        
               | latchkey wrote:
               | ETH has a $223b market cap, so 1b is .45%.
        
               | delusional wrote:
               | No? It's not?
        
               | latchkey wrote:
               | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/
        
               | umanwizard wrote:
               | Regardless, 1 billion is not 4% of 223 billion. You're
               | off by a factor of ten.
        
               | latchkey wrote:
               | fixed... =)
        
               | arcticbull wrote:
               | Market cap is not market depth, you can't withdraw $223B
               | from a speculative asset with a $223B market cap. Just
               | look at SafeMoon lol. Market cap isn't a bank account.
               | It's determined at the margin by the last transaction
               | price multiplied by the number of units outstanding.
               | Bringing it up in this context is just misleading.
        
               | colecut wrote:
               | 0.45%
        
               | latchkey wrote:
               | damn maths. thanks!
        
               | everfree wrote:
               | Ethereum's daily trading volume is $7 billion, so it's
               | likely that $1 billion would hardly affect its valuation.
        
               | arcticbull wrote:
               | Now subtract out the wash trading. I'm not saying it
               | would or wouldn't affect the valuation, I'm saying that
               | the top-line volume is a known fiction. Remember when
               | "Coinbase Employee A" traded some 99% of the entire
               | global LTC volume between two bots at Coinbase? Sure it's
               | old news, but that's the _most_ reputable exchange. [1,
               | 2]
               | 
               | Much of the crypto market is a digital Potemkin village
               | designed to make you feel like you're not nearly as alone
               | as you are.
               | 
               | [1] https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8369-21
               | 
               | [2] https://news.bitcoin.com/ipo-coinbase-pays-
               | cftc-6-5-million-...
        
               | ChainOfFools wrote:
               | Potemkin as an adjective is such a useful tool when
               | talking about the crypto scene. here's a post from when I
               | used it extensively I guess about 8 years ago, in the
               | same vein. Unfortunately as part of the cold war argot it
               | seems to just draw blank stares from a lot of people
               | under 35 or so.
               | 
               | <https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/3hrum5/degene
               | rate...>
               | 
               | "Potemkin exchange, Potemkin conversation, it's Potemkins
               | all the way down. Like a matrioshka doll each layer
               | deeper is identical to the one before, but smaller and
               | less articulately defined. "
        
               | arcticbull wrote:
               | I wish I could take credit for the term, but I'm also a
               | huge fan of 'Sierpinski scheme'.
               | 
               | Also, what on God's green flat earth was that article
               | about? The one you were responding to, lol. I mean the
               | late Mircea Popescu was a real piece of work, but, just,
               | wow.
        
               | ChainOfFools wrote:
               | Popescu is like the ur-bitcoiner, and by extension the
               | ur-kleptocurrency scumbag. He's one of the handful of
               | people who have (or in his case, had) quite a bit of
               | influence over the perpetual number go up movement of the
               | market cap due to being one of the very earliest large
               | hoarders of coins at penny prices, and a complete Kool-
               | Aid drinking Central bank/central government hating
               | misanthropic troll.
               | 
               | Although I will say in his direct company, he was fairly
               | well-mannered and clearly had a curious mind but one
               | warped by what must have been some sort of Trisomy on the
               | asshole gene.
               | 
               | That article was lifted directly from his blog which, I'm
               | not sure may still be active even now, that contain much
               | of his musings on that same topic as well as lots of
               | others, all as reprehensible and in my view absolutely
               | would have entitled him to an early death - assuming he
               | didn't fake it.
               | 
               | Sierpinski scheme, hah! Now I really want to somehow tie
               | that end with Zooko's triangle. Reminds me of the guy who
               | made a guide to "writing your first ethereum contract in
               | Pyramid Scheme" oh another variation just occured to me:
               | Fractal Fraud
        
               | tornato7 wrote:
               | You can sell $150M worth of ETH right now on-chain
               | without moving the price much. If you aggregate the other
               | chains and exchanges it's probably close to $1b in an
               | instant sell, of course if you TWAP you'll get much
               | better execution.
        
               | DANmode wrote:
               | You...don't have to subtract anything.
               | 
               | Liquidity is liquidity.
               | 
               | If liquidity goes away when big boys start selling, then,
               | well, someone would have picked up on that, shown that,
               | with data.
               | 
               | Otherwise, the (very real!) accusations of wash trading
               | and other price fixing don't have tons to do with
               | available liquidity, which as a term, refers to an
               | investors ability to sell in a timely fashion.
        
               | Retric wrote:
               | Daily trade volume doesn't represent what it used to as
               | market makers/HFT algorithms get into and out of
               | positions several times a day. What matters for
               | estimating impact is essentially the net flow across the
               | day/week/whatever not the transaction volume. It's
               | unlikely to precipitate a sell off but a 1+% dip in the
               | short term isn't unrealistic.
        
               | everfree wrote:
               | Ethereum has 1% dips regularly, on the hourly. In crypto,
               | that's generally considered very stable.
        
               | Retric wrote:
               | By short term I mean weeks to months not minutes.
               | 
               | I doubt anyone would try and liquidate it in a single
               | transaction on public markets.
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | _One_ transaction accounting for _at least_ 15 per cent
               | of the trading volume for a day absolutely is going to
               | affect its valuation.
        
               | spaceman_2020 wrote:
               | Even on Uniswap, swapping 10,000 ETH ($18.5M) has just
               | 0.9% slippage.
               | 
               | There is pretty decent liquidity for ETH and BTC at
               | least, both on and off-chain.
        
             | delusional wrote:
             | If we're both running our own ponzi scheme and you give me
             | $1 worth IOUs to your ponzi scheme, before later
             | readjusting your ponzi scheme to be worth 1000x what it was
             | previously. I would on paper have $1000 of your money,
             | since that's what my IOU in your ponzi scheme is now
             | "worth". If my ponzi scheme then folds before yours, you
             | could claim that I've defrauded you for $1000, but I'd
             | argue I haven't defrauded you in any real sense, in fact
             | you tried to defraud me, and I just so happened to fail at
             | defrauding my customers first.
             | 
             | Maybe Ethereum is "liquid" enough to absorb that withdrawal
             | (Madoff was plenty liquid until he wasn't), that doesn't
             | mean there's actually any real value.
        
               | SoftTalker wrote:
               | Lots of stuff has value, until it doesn't. Tulips,
               | beanie-babies, or pet rocks come to mind. Doesn't mean
               | it's a scam necessarily, could just be a fad --
               | irrational, but with no fraudulent intent behind it.
        
               | chx wrote:
               | oh bitcoin, ethereum and any such crypto"currency" (even
               | the name is chosen to evoke certain emotions) is pretty
               | solidly established to be scams. Read
               | 
               | https://ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/bitcoin/2020-12-31-bitcoin-
               | pon...
               | 
               | https://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/bitcoin/2021-01-16-yes-
               | pon...
               | 
               | or if that's too long then consider how any of these
               | crypto"currencies" with transaction fees are _negative
               | sum games_ and such they are scams (and no, stocks, gold
               | and cash are not such).
        
           | kyleblarson wrote:
           | That's as good as money sir, those are IOU's.
        
       | dotnet00 wrote:
       | Centralized ~exchanges~ (edit: services) defeat the point of
       | crypto (particularly of a blockchain), so people responsible for
       | said centralization are only in it for the money. Thus, the
       | question with all of these companies is how long before they get
       | outed for scamming their customers.
        
         | kelthuzad wrote:
         | That's a reductionist view, there can be many reasons why
         | somebody would want to temporarily park a portion of their
         | assets on a centralized exchange. It's a a trade off between
         | convenience, security, higher liquidity, trading opportunities
         | et cetera, these are just some that come to mind. One can do
         | all of that and still have the majority of their assets in cold
         | storage. The world is not white and black.
        
       | sdfghswe wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | sergiotapia wrote:
       | Should have donated more money to democrats, like SBF.
        
         | bhouston wrote:
         | That didn't seem to help SBF though - he is still arrested and
         | bring prosecuted for his financial crimes.
         | 
         | Also SBF contributed to both D and R equally apparently - but
         | he did his R contributions dark to avoid scrutiny, but is that
         | claim of his true? I don't know:                 Although
         | federal election receipts show that Bankman-Fried donated
         | almost exclusively to Democrats, he claimed on a November phone
         | call with YouTuber Tiffany Fong that he donated an equal amount
         | to Republicans and Democrats.            "All my Republican
         | donations were dark," he said, referring to political donations
         | that are not publicly disclosed in FEC filings. "The reason was
         | not for regulatory reasons, it's because reporters freak the f
         | --k out if you donate to Republicans. They're all super
         | liberal, and I didn't want to have that fight."
         | Given that he donated nearly $40 million to Democrats in the
         | 2022 election cycle--and he admitted to giving an equal amount
         | to Republicans--his total political contributions may have
         | actually been around $80 million.
         | 
         | https://time.com/6241262/sam-bankman-fried-political-donatio...
        
           | pessimizer wrote:
           | https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/senate_ftx
        
           | sergiotapia wrote:
           | Please ;)
           | 
           | "Federal prosecutors are dropping campaign finance violation
           | charges"
           | 
           | "Bankman-Fried -- who is accused of stealing from customers
           | of his now-defunct FTX cryptocurrency exchange -- still faces
           | 12 other charges in the case, though five more of the counts
           | are still in question"
           | 
           | https://nypost.com/2023/07/27/feds-drop-one-charge-
           | against-s...
        
             | bhouston wrote:
             | The reason is because the extradition agreement didn't
             | mention those charges, which is a technicality
             | unfortunately. He is still be prosecuted for his financial
             | crimes.
        
               | pessimizer wrote:
               | The pretense is that the US respects our agreements with
               | powerful governments like Bermuda's. especially when they
               | come to US political corruption, which Bermuda for some
               | reason feels is very important to protect. This is
               | sillier than the parliamentarian tanking the $15 minimum
               | wage.
        
         | adrr wrote:
         | https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66631291/united-states-...
         | 
         | Seems like a bad investment.
        
       | jgalt212 wrote:
       | Richard Heart is a force for good.
       | 
       | https://richardheart.com/
        
       | bebop404 wrote:
       | It's a shame it took this long to go after such a blatant Ponzi.
       | There is even an ad for this scheme painted on a wall near my
       | home (in Mexico), so one would hope that the US will not be the
       | only country where he will face charges.
        
         | kelthuzad wrote:
         | It's crazy how many crypto natives were warning "hexicans"
         | about hex and pointing out the most obvious indicator that it's
         | a scam, namely Richard Heart defrauding them, yet most of his
         | fanboys were not even willing to listen or evaluate the
         | evidence with an open mind.
        
           | DANmode wrote:
           | Came to this thread just to say RIP Hexicans, thanks for
           | providing the space!
        
           | HappySweeney wrote:
           | That would have had them admitting to themselves that their
           | money is gone, including the promised gains they likely
           | already spent.
        
       | blueyes wrote:
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/HEXcrypto/comments/zotxtv/father_of...
       | 
       | Kind of a shoe-shine boy indicator ... time to get out.
        
         | rideontime wrote:
         | > He wears the same hat in every interview
         | 
         | Jesus christ. Guy uses interviews about his murdered daughter
         | to shill his shitcoin?
         | 
         | e: Yep, they're proud of this: https://hex.buzz/steve-
         | goncalves-hex/ Scumbags.
        
       | houseatrielah wrote:
       | I had some interest in HEX after I saw an airplane with a "BUY
       | HEX" banner fly over my house. The major trick is the decimal
       | point. Launch a crypto worth 0.000000001 USD per unit, then when
       | it goes to 0.0000001 USD per unit because of low supply, scream
       | into YouTube: "I GAVE YOU 100X PEOPLE, WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT FROM
       | ME?"
        
       | Analemma_ wrote:
       | Apart from _maybe_ Coinbase, I just take as a given that every
       | single actor in crypto is a criminal, and so far this assumption
       | has been pretty much bang-on accurate.
        
         | aionaiodfgnio wrote:
         | _Maybe_ Coinbase won 't just waltz off with their depositor's
         | money, but their business model appears to be illegal from top
         | to bottom. The SEC alleges that basically everything they are
         | doing is illegal. Even if the SEC is wrong, Coinbase's practice
         | of operating as broker, exchange, and clearing agent is a
         | massive conflict of interest.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | loeg wrote:
         | Just to expand a bit on the "maybe," it seems pretty clear that
         | the SEC's opinion is that most of Coinbase's business model is
         | being an unregistered securities broker (except for perhaps
         | allowing trading bitcoin and ethereum), which is illegal.
        
         | dcist wrote:
         | And although there hasn't been any evidence of top-level fraud,
         | a Coinbase product manager was sentenced to two years in prison
         | for an insider trading scam:
         | https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/05/09/former-coinbase-employ...
        
         | dpflan wrote:
         | Coinbase is dressed up nicely, but you say basically that all
         | actors and therefore coin creators/owners are criminal, then CB
         | facilitates criminal and is criminal implicitly by turning a
         | blind eye to facilitation at a minimum assumption of
         | involvement. It's been called a casino.
        
         | SamPatt wrote:
         | I co-founded an a16z and USV funded crypto startup in 2015, and
         | I knew lots of people in the industry.
         | 
         | There are certainly bad actors, probably more than other
         | industries. But it's absolutely nothing like "every single
         | actor."
         | 
         | Many were (and presumably still are) true believers in the
         | technology, and got into it the field with good (though perhaps
         | naive) intentions.
        
       | DonHopkins wrote:
       | Richard Hart (aka "Spam King" Richard J Schueler) has an account
       | on Hacker News that he used to shill his scams and attempt to
       | recruit gullible HN developers to debase themselves by working on
       | his shitcoins, just like Rick and Morty's "Glooty" alien who's
       | always asking "Do you want to develop an app?":
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=RichardHeart
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=RichardHeart
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27139757
       | 
       | RichardHeart on May 13, 2021 | prev | next [-]
       | 
       | Elon is still promoting Dogecoin which is also proof of work.
       | Lots of people will be harmed when it crashes. Nearly all
       | cryptocurrencies crash 85% every once in a while.
       | 
       | DonHopkins on May 13, 2021 | parent | prev | next [-]
       | 
       | Humor: So I'm sure your explanation of why somebody hasn't
       | already successfully implemented practical proof of stake before
       | is totally credible and unbiased! ;)
       | 
       | Not Humor: If somebody will work on it for free, do you promise
       | to pay them in your own cryptocurrency? "Will work for stake!"
       | 
       | RichardHeart on May 13, 2021 | root | parent | prev | next [-]
       | 
       | You don't have to destroy the environment to maintain a database.
       | There's other ways to achieve censorship resistance than waste.
       | Blockchains are are all social consensus anyway.
       | 
       | DonHopkins on May 13, 2021 | root | parent | next [-]
       | 
       | "Do you want to develop my new cryptocurrency?" is the new "Do
       | you want to develop an app?"
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVy0JWX5XEY&ab_channel=Adult...
       | 
       | Edit: [You spoiled the joke by retroactively editing your post
       | and removing your amusing disclaimer that you had a financial
       | stake in shilling POS, and your hilarious call for programmers to
       | help you develop your new cryptocurrency! "Dodge, dodge." That's
       | what makes you so funny! The "Glooty" character parody is spot
       | on.]
       | 
       | RichardHeart on May 13, 2021 | root | parent | next [-]
       | 
       | I see your joke and raise you one joke
       | https://paywithexposure.com/ Also, you should actually watch the
       | interview on the page you just linked. It's amazing.
       | 
       | DonHopkins on May 13, 2021 | root | parent | next [-]
       | 
       | Not a joke:
       | 
       | Confronting Richard Heart of HEX - SPAM KING and Crypto Scammer
       | 
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20201115205631/https://www.coint...
       | 
       | So will you again confirm what the article claims you already
       | confirmed?
       | 
       | >Richard Heart was sued for spamming in 2002 under WA state law.
       | Source:
       | 
       | https://www.zdnet.com/article/peacefire-org-beats-spammers-i...
       | 
       | >During the interview at ANON, Richard confirmed that he was one
       | of the first people in the world to be sued for online spam, back
       | in 2002. This shows us Richard has experience abusing unregulated
       | markets, as he is doing with crypto these days.
       | 
       | Is this an accurate quote of your own words?
       | 
       | >When I pressed the matter and asked for a simple "yes" or "no"
       | as to whether he, as the FOUNDER of HEX, knows who benefits from
       | the funds sent to the "Origin Address" he flat-out said "I'm
       | dodging your question." Dodging the question! He proceeds to
       | repeat "Dodge, dodge."
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29367412
       | 
       | DonHopkins on Nov 28, 2021 | parent | context | favorite | on:
       | Proof of stake is incapable of producing a consens...
       | 
       | Speaking of POS scammers, what ever happened to Richard "Dodge
       | Dodge" Heart, winner of the "Golden Pump Award" for "Best New
       | Scam" for his POS get-rich-quick pyramid scheme called "HEX", who
       | falsely claims that proof of stake is a proven successful
       | replacement for proof of work, and who shills HEX and tries to
       | recruit unsuspecting developers and victims here on HN and many
       | other places, by making illegal false claims of providing CDs
       | (certificates of deposit)?
       | 
       | To be fair, I'd love to hear him chime in on this discussion, and
       | tell his side of the story, relate his exploits and prosecution
       | as a viagra spammer, and finally answer all those unanswered
       | questions people have asked him, to which he replied "Dodge
       | Dodge".
       | 
       | Not that he's unique or special: POS shills like him are a dime a
       | dozen. But he hangs out here and shills on HN, and has won awards
       | for his deceptive scams (and also lost court cases too), and
       | claims to "help people" on his web site, so I hope to hear from
       | him again.
       | 
       | https://richardheart.com/
       | 
       | His real name is actually Richard J Schueler, under which he is
       | famously known as the "Spam King", for being one of the first
       | people in the world to be successfully sued for online spam,
       | specifically the Viagra spam scheme that he ran from Panama
       | (which he lost).
       | 
       | Richard Hart (aka "Spam King" Richard J Schueler) wins the
       | "Golden Pump Award" for "Best New Scam" for his POS shitcoin
       | Ponzi scheme "HEX":
       | 
       | https://twitter.com/JuanSGalt/status/1233242355995750400
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=857&v=tf-lJu5iDh...
       | 
       | Peacefire.org beats spammers in court.
       | 
       | https://www.zdnet.com/article/peacefire-org-beats-spammers-i...
       | 
       | >Free-speech group Peacefire.org wins a legal round in its fight
       | against unsolicited e-mail, invoking Washington state's anti-spam
       | law.
       | 
       | >The King County District Court in Bellevue, Wash., on Monday
       | granted Peacefire $1,000 in damages in each of three complaints
       | filed by Peacefire Webmaster Bennett Haselton. The small-claims
       | suit alleged that Red Moss Media, Paulann Allison and Richard
       | Schueler [who now operates under the pseudonum "Richard Hart"]
       | sent unsolicited commercial messages to Haselton that bore
       | deceptive information such as a forged return e-mail address or
       | misleading subject line.
       | 
       | Confronting Richard Heart of HEX - SPAM KING and Crypto Scammer
       | 
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20201115205631/https://www.coint...
       | 
       | >During ANON Summit 2020, I participated in a "fireside chat"
       | with Richard Heart, founder of HEX. HEX is one of the most
       | sophisticated, if not THE most sophisticated scams I have ever
       | seen.
       | 
       | >Why was I so aggressive with Richard? I have a lot of experience
       | fighting with scammers, at events, and in online discussions. I'm
       | familiar with their bullshit techniques. Richard is the sort of
       | "master debater" who will answer a question without actually
       | answering the content of the question. I watched more than 6
       | hours of his previous talks and learned how to tell when he was
       | trying to avoid a real answer.
       | 
       | >If you don't want to sit through hours of interviews yourself,
       | this 4 minute video not only sheds light on Heart's motivation
       | for establishing HEX, but also shows just how abrasive and crude
       | he can be. This video was not created or edited by
       | Cointelligence.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MIdlXHedlU
       | 
       | >I want to draw your attention to the quote in the video above:
       | "What am I going to make more money doing? Promoting my token,
       | that I own a whole ton of? Or promoting bitcoin, where I own one-
       | one zillionth of the available supply?" He's clearly in this to
       | make money for himself in any way possible. [...]
       | 
       | >When asked why HEX was not categorized as a security, at around
       | the 21 minute mark, Richard offered an explanation that has no
       | legal grounding. On the website, HEX claims that it is "The first
       | high interest blockchain certificate of deposit." However, HEX
       | has no legal authority to issue CDs. Richard is illegally
       | claiming to provide CDs when in fact the instruments are nothing
       | but glorified savings accounts.
       | 
       | More quotes: "What's up now, fggot? What are you going to do now,
       | you little btch? Get the fuck out of here! That's the dumbest
       | piece of shit I've ever seen in my fucking life. [...] Let me
       | give you some more bullshit, ok?" -Richard Heart aka Richard J
       | Schueler
       | 
       | Richard Heart - Spam, ICOs, and Death Threats
       | 
       | https://imnotdead.co.uk/blog/richard-heart
       | 
       | Richard James Schueler - Friggin Spam King
       | 
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20190416235350/http://www.panama...
       | 
       | Why HEX is a Ponzi and not a solid investment (Part 2): Richard
       | Heart
       | 
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/kwhjxa/why_...
       | 
       | >During the interview at ANON, Richard confirmed that he was one
       | of the first people in the world to be sued for online spam, back
       | in 2002. This shows us Richard has experience abusing unregulated
       | markets, as he is doing with crypto these days.
       | 
       | Richard: this an accurate quote of your own words?
       | 
       | >When I pressed the matter and asked for a simple "yes" or "no"
       | as to whether he, as the FOUNDER of HEX, knows who benefits from
       | the funds sent to the "Origin Address" he flat-out said "I'm
       | dodging your question." Dodging the question! He proceeds to
       | repeat "Dodge, dodge."
       | 
       | Richard, your tag-line "Do you want to develop my new
       | cryptocurrency?" is the new "Do you want to develop an app?"
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVy0JWX5XEY&ab_channel=Adult...
       | 
       | "Dodge, dodge." -Richard Heart aka Richard J Schueler
        
         | jacquesm wrote:
         | I knew this comment would be here.
        
       | wonderwonder wrote:
       | The craziest part to me is that he was so incredibly open about
       | it and people just kept giving him $. He just made video after
       | video showing himself wearing outfits worth tens of thousands of
       | dollars. Not a video about something else where he happened to be
       | dressed up, but the video was literally about how much the items
       | he was wearing cost. On top of that he looked absolutely
       | ridiculous. I have never seen such a real life example of money
       | not being able to buy class.
        
         | ChainOfFools wrote:
         | I had the strange luck to have known Richard Hart before he
         | became a crypto huckster. In the year or so leading up to his
         | transition from random spammer nobody to wealthy scamming
         | random nobody, he was pretty aggressively critical and cynical
         | about all things cryptocurrency, especially about the abject
         | gullibility and willful ignorance of the people who sign on to
         | all of the ideological nonsense about the blockchain and
         | decentralization, and people who take all of the obviously
         | manipulated metrics about market cap, volume and activity at
         | face value. He could have been your very standard hn
         | cryptocritic, going by his stated positions.
         | 
         | I'm not sure exactly what happened to him in the year or so
         | between when I last encountered him in certain telegram
         | channels, but I get the sense that his reaction to the shit
         | show of cryptocurrency was rather than settling for being
         | another Cassandra with a lot to say and no money to say it
         | about the dangers of the crypto Ponzi scene, he went full
         | Mirror Universe and decided to simply take advantage of the
         | people who he had contempt for, as openly and boldly and
         | shamelessly and transparently as he possibly could. This way he
         | wouldn't have to feel as guilty about fooling them. Like a
         | Stephen Colbert or Sacha Baron Cohen but with more meanness and
         | less talent, and without any remorse for bilking the naive
         | minnows snagged in the bycatch of his cryptobro trawling net.
        
           | wonderwonder wrote:
           | He very much took advantage of the adage, "a fool and his
           | money are soon parted". On some level I can't even blame him.
           | People are literally sending hundreds/ thousands of dollars
           | in eth to people that just list an address and give vague
           | mention of getting something valuable back. He probably
           | figured, why not me? He could have just moved to Russia and
           | have been fine. SEC frowns upon blatant scams though.
        
           | arp242 wrote:
           | It sounds like the old "create an elaborate smokescreen
           | comprised of the truth" trick. "Surely if he was a REAL
           | scammer he would never do all these blatant scammy things?!"
           | 
           | Jimmy Savile was a master of this: "no actual pedophile would
           | say he will stick his dick in to anyone he can lay his hands
           | on, especially not with all the rumours floating around!?"
           | Well...
        
       | colesantiago wrote:
       | Good.
       | 
       | Almost every 'founder' of a token is a scammer. Bitcoin and
       | Crypto have no use case other being than an unregulated scammers
       | paradise which ransomware, fraud and pyramid and ponzi schemes
       | run rampant.
       | 
       | It should all be regulated out of existence.
       | 
       | Stephen Diehl, Molly White, David Gerard, Ben McKenzie and other
       | crypto sceptics makes this clear which I highly recommend
       | reading.
       | 
       | https://www.stephendiehl.com/blog/crypto-is-a-scam.html
       | 
       | https://ben-mckenzie.com/
       | 
       | https://web3isgoinggreat.com/
       | 
       | https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/
       | 
       | https://blog.mollywhite.net/blockchain/
        
         | LexiMax wrote:
         | And of course, Dan Olson's amazing "Line Goes Up."
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ_xWvX1n9g
         | 
         | https://eizebasa.baby/line-goes-up (Complete script)
        
           | rqtwteye wrote:
           | Dan Olsen is fantastic. "line goes up" is great. So is Hhis
           | video is about flat earthers.
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | meh civil suit. these people are used to being sued or threated
       | lawsuits .
        
       | hobs wrote:
       | I almost was very sad because I thought this was referring to
       | hex.tech which I love and is great
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-07-31 23:02 UTC)