[HN Gopher] Estonia saved its citizens 820 years by moving publi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Estonia saved its citizens 820 years by moving public services
       online
        
       Author : valkrieco
       Score  : 209 points
       Date   : 2022-11-30 17:20 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.karlsnotes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.karlsnotes.com)
        
       | atlasunshrugged wrote:
       | Pretty basic article but Estonia is a fascinating place,
       | especially for e-government. There was a great longform New
       | Yorker article on it a few years back
       | https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/18/estonia-the-di...
        
       | Proven wrote:
        
       | sdfhbdf wrote:
       | The title is a litte misleading since                   > The
       | Estonian government estimates that going digital has saved the
       | state and its citizens, 820 years in time and resources
       | 
       | It didn't save it it just estimates it and we're not sure how
       | they arrived at this number.
        
       | simonebrunozzi wrote:
       | BS.
       | 
       | It should be "820 years PER YEAR", and with a 1.3M people in
       | Estonia, it equates to 5.4 hours per year. JUST 5.4 hours per
       | year. Not impressive.
        
         | andix wrote:
         | Which is nearly one day of holiday people can save every year.
         | So I would call it very impressive, as most people work during
         | the opening hours of public services and would need to take
         | time off to go there.
        
         | machinekob wrote:
         | 5.4h more like 10+ h as older and younger population is not
         | doing anything that require spending times in public que, and
         | it is very impressive not waiting extra 6-10h per year + twice
         | that for transporting to and out of the government buildings.
        
         | Dylan16807 wrote:
         | That's not impressive to you? Most of a day of dealing with
         | government timewaste, every single year, is a lot to me.
        
       | tdiff wrote:
       | Would it be fair to say that 820 years is 0.3 days per Estonian
       | citizen? Is saving that amount of time a significant achievement?
        
       | Juliate wrote:
       | +1.
       | 
       | Careful still, public services are also a matter of human
       | representation, of accessibility, to nurture the relation between
       | (all) the citizens and the state (as it also is in the private
       | sector, between a brand and customers).
       | 
       | Moving public services online is great IFF it does not remove at
       | the same time a satisfying option for offline/physical access to
       | the same services, for those that are not able to use the online
       | access (disabled, old, unused to computers or tablets, remote
       | areas, etc. - those are still a significant part of the people,
       | and even if, an equal access to public services is a must).
        
         | skeletal88 wrote:
         | Calm down, there still are physical offices where people can go
         | and do their stuff, nobody is forcing people to use the online
         | services.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | some_random wrote:
       | It felt like this was really low, but according to the most fun
       | wolfram alpha query I've made in a while that's 5.68 hours per
       | person!
       | 
       | https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=hours+in+860+years+%2F+...
        
       | chungy wrote:
       | Online voting is a terrible idea rife with flaws, intentional and
       | unintentional.
       | 
       | In-person paper voting is the only reasonable system.
        
         | kristianheljas wrote:
         | I'd argue that a paper is much more easily
         | tamperable/replaceable than a digital signature. That, of
         | course depends on how much you trust the ID chip card security
         | and mathematics around the encryption..
        
         | Zanfa wrote:
         | While online voting isn't perfect, in-person paper ballots
         | aren't magic. Estonians had some 60-odd years of paper-only
         | voting experience under the Soviet Union, didn't make one bit
         | of difference when it came to the complete fabrication of the
         | results.
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
        
       | imwillofficial wrote:
       | The e-citizenship stuff is super cool too
        
       | Genbox wrote:
       | Estonia has greatly embraced the digital identity through smart
       | cards. They have been on the forefront of digitalizing
       | governmental services.
       | 
       | Website: https://www.id.ee/en/
       | 
       | Timeline of implementations: https://e-estonia.com/story/
       | 
       | Github: https://github.com/open-eid
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | That's the country from which Skype emerged; the first usable
       | video calling experience, years ahead of everyone else.
        
       | dghughes wrote:
       | I'm in Canada and all I can think of is how my Mom, uncles, other
       | older relatives do not have a computer. They have no interest in
       | anything on a computer and have never touched one. You could put
       | one in front of them powered on, logged in, web browser open, and
       | they'd have no clue how to operate it to enter info.
       | 
       | We had a hurricane here and Mom applied to the Red Cross for
       | disaster relief. She got a PIN for her online banking which she
       | doesn't have or ever will.
       | 
       | There are quite a few people without computers. It's maddening to
       | see some or proposed government services only be offered
       | exclusively on the Internet.
        
         | pbhjpbhj wrote:
         | Perhaps we should consider it akin to literacy. In the past,
         | and indeed present, plenty of people couldn't read and so would
         | need to seek help to access government services that required,
         | for example, completing a form or reading instructions.
         | 
         | Nowadays most people read (in my country, UK), though
         | completing forms can have high literacy/intelligence demands.
         | Some lack computer skills but almost everyone (in my country)
         | has some access to computers in free local government libraries
         | and in other local community centres. It's not terribly
         | convenient, granted.
         | 
         | So should we avoid offering services that need literacy to
         | access, or just those that require _computer_ literacy? I 'd
         | argue neither, but people should have long transition periods
         | (multiple years) when a system is moving to access only via
         | computer and government should ensure all communities have
         | ongoing access to computers where that's reasonable.
        
         | germanier wrote:
         | It's a chicken-and-egg situation. Estonia has a much higher
         | than average number of elderly using such online services.
         | 
         | If you for any reason don't want to, you can still visit a
         | government office in person to do your business.
        
           | skeletal88 wrote:
           | My 90 year old grandfather is doing lots of stuff online,
           | needs help with the computer occasionally, but otherwise is
           | doing ok.
           | 
           | Well.. he finished the Technical University with cum laude in
           | mechanics, that maybe helps.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | vander_elst wrote:
       | Saving 820 years is great, but it would be nice to define it
       | better. From the article I not sure if they mean 820 man years in
       | total or man years per year or something else. It would be useful
       | to know how much energy was spent to achieve this e.g. of they
       | spent 8000 man years to achieve this it would change the
       | perspective.
       | 
       | Edit: grammar
        
         | itake wrote:
        
           | concordDance wrote:
           | "Man" is an ancient word that means both "human" and "male
           | human" depending on context. The former usage actually
           | predates the latter.
        
             | itake wrote:
             | why not say "human years" instead? The current word choice
             | is open to marginalizing women.
        
             | etage3 wrote:
             | I think itake understands this and was making a point (an
             | important one at that). Douglas R. Hofstadter made the same
             | point (perhaps more eloquently) in "A Person Paper on
             | Purity in Language"[0], which might be another avenue if
             | you wish to understand what the parent comment was pointing
             | at.
             | 
             | [0]https://www.angelfire.com/rebellion/personpaper/
        
               | Dylan16807 wrote:
               | It is not an important point in a context like "man-
               | years".
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | vander_elst wrote:
           | I didn't mean to gender, sorry if it was perceived that way.
           | My understanding is that this is a standard industry term.
           | Anyway, I'll try to use human years in the future.
        
             | pbhjpbhj wrote:
             | "Human years" makes it sound like you're differentiating
             | from some pseudo timescale like 'dog years'. Man years
             | doesn't have any connotation of sex of the people involved.
             | Ironically the person objecting is the only one projecting
             | a gendered interpretation on to it; it's like punching
             | yourself in the face and complaining that punching people
             | in the faces shouldn't be allowed.
             | 
             | "Man" is just Saxon/Old English for person (and is
             | considered to be from at least PIE origins).
             | 
             | My late mum used to complain about the term Chair instead
             | of Chairman, "I'm a person not a piece of furniture", she
             | was chairman on lots of committees.
        
           | rcarr wrote:
           | all men are pigs so our life spans are only 20 years
           | 
           | joke obviously
        
       | 0x138d5 wrote:
       | hiiele?
       | 
       | On a serious note, while the eID/digital gov system is great and
       | all it does have some jankiness. The address search system
       | everyone uses has been a PITA for a while and the tax system
       | still keels over for a day or so when the possibility of
       | submitting returns opens. Then we had the case of one dude
       | scraping several hundred thousand ID card pictures [0].
       | 
       | Also the broadband part is so-so. Estonian internet is
       | notoriously expensive and slow compared to our near peers [1].
       | 
       | [0] https://news.err.ee/1608291072/hacker-downloads-close-
       | to-300...
       | 
       | [1] https://news.postimees.ee/7635673/estonia-s-home-internet-
       | sp...
        
         | Tade0 wrote:
         | > hiiele?
         | 
         | I live bits that give rare insights into other cultures.
         | 
         | The description of the appropriate reddit page google-
         | translates to "let's meet at the fire".
         | 
         | Is that correct?
        
           | Avamander wrote:
           | More like "let's meet at the sacred forest" (to
           | celebrate/rejoice).
           | 
           | "Hiiele" is the allative form of "hiis"
           | (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiis_(sacred_site) )
        
             | Tade0 wrote:
             | That's even better, thanks!
        
           | skeletal88 wrote:
           | When finland is mentioned on the internet then people post
           | "torilla tavataan" - "lets meet at the market!!". So we
           | estonians started saying "hiiele!" - lets meet.. at the
           | sacred forest on the same occasion.
        
       | ttobbaybbob wrote:
       | so at 27k gdp per capita theyre saving ~$22m per year in lost
       | productivity, probably growing each year. Seems like a pretty
       | solid investment
        
       | xwdv wrote:
       | Unfortunately this is hardly anything. Consider that people spent
       | enough time playing Halo 2 online to cross the Milky Way galaxy
       | and come back.
        
       | spicymaki wrote:
       | Be careful what you wish for.
       | 
       | For the US if you automate public services you are going to
       | eliminate Federal, State, and Local bureaucratic jobs as well as
       | the support roles to interface to these services. For example if
       | you automated taxing, you would eliminate IRS employees as well
       | as accountants and software services such as Turbo Tax. In the US
       | we don't have universal healthcare, universal free education,
       | etc. so you be eliminating millions of jobs without a safety net.
       | Automation would have terrible economic repercussions. The
       | extreme level of graft and incompetence would mean the actual
       | automated services would not be very good and would be
       | horrifically expensive to produce and maintain.
       | 
       | I will take my number and wait on line.
        
         | skeletal88 wrote:
         | What? You are advocating for inefficient bureacracy because
         | otherwise the time-wasting bureaucrats would be laid off? Is
         | this sarcasm or you are serious with this?
        
       | TheMagicHorsey wrote:
       | Along the same lines, I found India's Aadhar system to be pretty
       | extraordinary. If you can put your civil liberties concerns aside
       | (and to be clear, I don't think you should), Aadhar has made govt
       | services in India several orders of magnitude more efficient and
       | fraud resistant. I recently sold a piece of property in India and
       | it took literally 10 minutes to do the transaction at a local
       | district office. You just go to a place and get a scan while
       | signing a document that says you are transferring the property.
       | That handles everything ... changing the owner in the public
       | registry, etc.
       | 
       | Compare that to buying a house in the US where you need to use
       | all kinds of third party title insurers etc., because you can't
       | necessarily be sure the person selling you the land actually has
       | ownership of the land in the registry at the moment you are doing
       | the sale.
       | 
       | Also, payment systems in India charge merchants something like
       | 0.1% or less, while credit card companies charge merchants 3-5%
       | in the US. In India everything is cheap because online
       | transactions are very secure ... your Aadhar identity allows you
       | to generate one time codes that are sent to vendors to authorize
       | payments. Even if the one time code is stolen, it can only be
       | used one time. Contrast that with the USA where if someone just
       | gets your social security number and address, they can often
       | impersonate you and charge thousands of dollars against your
       | identity. That insecurity has spawned billions of dollars of
       | costs in the US economy and enriched Visa and Mastercard. Its
       | dead weight on the economy.
        
         | Avamander wrote:
         | > I recently sold a piece of property in India and it took
         | literally 10 minutes to do the transaction at a local district
         | office. You just go to a place and get a scan while signing a
         | document that says you are transferring the property. That
         | handles everything ... changing the owner in the public
         | registry, etc.
         | 
         | Even that is excessive. Digital signatures (if available) do
         | the job.
        
       | myroon5 wrote:
       | Even without changing processes, hundreds of years of time could
       | be saved by reducing the frequency we have to interact with
       | government at all
       | 
       | For example, almost 20 American states require license renewal
       | every 4 years or more frequently:
       | 
       | https://ballotpedia.org/Driver%27s_license_costs_by_state,_2...
       | 
       | When I renew, there's no test (not even vision), and they don't
       | even retake my picture or let me update my height. They just
       | print the same ID with new dates
       | 
       | ---
       | 
       | Obviously, Americans filing tax information the government
       | already knows every year is another canonical example
        
         | JTbane wrote:
         | >Obviously, Americans filing tax information the government
         | already knows every year is another canonical example
         | 
         | Yeah it's pretty ridiculous, especially when you hold things
         | like mutual funds. You have to figure out how much to pay every
         | quarter. Why can't the gov't bill me with the info they already
         | have?
        
         | ryukafalz wrote:
         | I'd go the other way; we really should require retesting for
         | driver's license renewals.
         | 
         | New Jersey for example just enacted a "safe passing" law
         | earlier this year in an attempt to make bicyclists and
         | pedestrians safer. But existing drivers will never have to
         | demonstrate that they know this because we never retest people
         | after they get their license once.
        
           | spurgu wrote:
           | Couldn't the government (or state) simply run ad campaigns
           | for a couple of weeks informing the public of new changes?
           | 
           | Edit: Most changes are not rocket science, you simply need to
           | be aware of them.
        
             | germanier wrote:
             | A simple ad campaign running for a few weeks hardly reaches
             | everybody. Not even close to.
        
             | frenchy wrote:
             | There's a difference between knowing the laws of the road,
             | and being a competent enough driver that you can perform
             | them. The rules are rarely, if ever, enforced, so a lot of
             | drivers just figure it's not a big of a deal.
             | 
             | It's easy to believe that road safety isn't that important
             | when you're surrounded by several tons of plastic and metal
             | armor.
        
           | nashashmi wrote:
           | Then we should have licenses for bicyclists too!
           | 
           | The reason we have licenses (aka controls on who can drive
           | cars) is to curb dangerous and irresponsible driving, mark
           | drivers for driving egregiously, and remove people or not
           | allow drivers on the road when they don't have the motor
           | skills to navigate a vehicle on the road.
           | 
           | Knowing the rules is secondary, if not tertiary. Otherwise
           | bicyclists should also have licenses and license plates
           | because rules apply to them as well.
        
             | piva00 wrote:
             | Rules apply to them but they aren't driving a 2-3 ton hunk
             | of metal that's basically a murder machine. Their danger to
             | other road users is much, much lower than from anything
             | self-propelled just due to physics.
             | 
             | Here in Sweden it doesn't matter how much right of way you
             | have, if you are driving a car you're responsible for the
             | safety of others in the road, even more if they're a
             | pedestrian or cyclist. It's not excuse that a pedestrian
             | was jaywalking or whatever bizarre law to limit access to
             | the road for people you got in the US, you are ultimately
             | responsible for the safety of other users. You're drilled
             | and tested on that in your driving lessons and exams, you
             | will fail your driving test if you fail to yield for a
             | pedestrian at any moment, even if it was just briefly not
             | pressing the brake pedal way before another road user is in
             | danger.
             | 
             | This is a false equivalence, yes, the road is shared and
             | has rules but one user of the road is safely driving on
             | tons of metal powered by hundreds of horsepower, the other
             | is pedaling a bike.
             | 
             | Degree and level matter. Don't hold such a black-and-white
             | view of the world, it's reductionist and not very smart.
        
           | Karrot_Kream wrote:
           | It's usually an equity issue, or championed as such by equity
           | groups. America is so car dependent that for folks at the
           | margins failing a driving test is the equivalent of losing
           | your job. That's why DL renewals almost rarely require any
           | re-testing and never require demonstrating driving skills.
        
             | whimsicalism wrote:
             | Hitting pedestrians also poses issues for folks at the
             | margins, yet we don't seek to educate those people on how
             | to avoid this potentially life destroying situation.
        
               | notch656a wrote:
               | I think you would be hard pressed to find someone
               | currently living with a license that got it at a time
               | where it was OK to will-nilly hit pedestrians.
        
               | CJefferson wrote:
               | I bet I can find plenty of people who have a licence, but
               | if retested now would fail -- which suggests they now
               | can't be trusted not to willy-nilly hit pedestrians.
        
               | Karrot_Kream wrote:
               | I agree but a lot of equity groups are not willing to
               | advocate for pedestrian lives. The perception a lot of
               | Americans have is that folks are either walking because
               | they have literally no option and are thus probably not
               | really working-class folks or they're out for recreation.
               | 
               | There's a growing number of organizations advocating for
               | pedestrian and cyclist safety but they have a lot less
               | funding and fewer connections that equity groups which
               | protect drivers. If you have the opportunity in your
               | area, donate to such a group or help make one yourself.
        
             | Invictus0 wrote:
             | Nonsense. It's an elderly issue, everyone knows elderly
             | people shouldn't be on the road but no one wants to take
             | their licenses (they vote in droves).
        
               | Karrot_Kream wrote:
               | That is one end of this issue, yes. But there's more to
               | it than just the elderly.
        
             | Swizec wrote:
             | > failing a driving test is the equivalent of
             | 
             | Devil's advocate: Maybe you shouldn't be driving, if you
             | might fail a driving test. Being tested on this should be a
             | complete non-issue for anyone with a few years of real
             | world driving experience.
        
         | notch656a wrote:
         | Arizona driver license don't expire until you are 65. The
         | linked website is innaccurate.
        
           | giantg2 wrote:
           | They do if they're REAL ID. By law they can only be valid up
           | to 8 years.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | Cthulhu_ wrote:
         | It's a decade over here, same for most forms of ID; there was a
         | period where it was reduced to 5 years, but that was due to
         | developing digital technologies, that is, chips on board the
         | documents - they foresaw that they might be outdated or
         | insecure in a few years, and they were right.
        
         | Arrath wrote:
         | Renewing online sure takes a lot of the burden out of the
         | regular renewals.
         | 
         | Of course, I'm now 33 and still using a picture of 21yo me on
         | my license which gets me second glances from bar tenders, TSA,
         | etc. But if it keeps me from having to go in to the DMV...
        
           | dottedmag wrote:
           | I think the point was not to renew online, but renew less
           | often.
        
             | Arrath wrote:
             | It was indeed, but in absence of 20-year licenses or the
             | like, I'll happily take the reduced friction of easier
             | online renewals.
        
             | giantg2 wrote:
             | REAL ID requires renewal every 8 years or less.
        
           | giantg2 wrote:
           | Will they even allow that for REAL ID now?
        
             | InitialLastName wrote:
             | Yes, I renewed my REAL ID earlier this year entirely
             | online.
             | 
             | It's possible that it would have been more complicated if I
             | had changed my address or needed to change any other
             | information.
        
               | giantg2 wrote:
               | Seems odd they don't want an up to date photo.
        
               | kristianheljas wrote:
               | They do, you need to submit at-most 6 month old photo
               | while renewing. Or go to the office to take one. Either
               | way, you also still need to go get the document from the
               | office as it is only handed over by person (but you can
               | pre-book a time slot!). Passport is a bit more
               | complicated, since it requires fingerprints as well.
        
               | giantg2 wrote:
               | Well then it's not "entirely online" like the other
               | poster says.
        
             | Arrath wrote:
             | Good question, I still need to get my REAL ID.
        
             | Dylan16807 wrote:
             | I got an online renewal for a REAL ID, _but_ that was for a
             | 4 year replacement of a 4 year card, and there was specific
             | language about having renewed in person the previous time.
             | 
             | So technically yes, but an 8 year REAL ID that has to be
             | renewed in person would be strictly better.
        
         | PartiallyTyped wrote:
         | That's mostly an american problem, not a "government bad"
         | problem.
        
           | dottedmag wrote:
           | I've got a driver's license in another country, and it's
           | still up for renewal every 5 years.
        
             | rospaya wrote:
             | Most countries treat driver's licences seriously, not like
             | the US.
             | 
             | It takes months of classes and driving hours, exams and
             | tests to get one where I live. Renewals mean getting your
             | eyes checked, no photos etc.
        
               | xboxnolifes wrote:
               | Sounds exactly the same as the US. The question is: how
               | difficult are the exams and tests? In the US, the written
               | exams are 80% irrelevant information that you pass by
               | wrought memorization right before, and the driving test
               | is trivial (parallel park, left turn, k-turn, right turn
               | back to start).
               | 
               | At least that was my experience in New Jersey.
        
           | imperfect_blue wrote:
           | It's almost a tautology. All things being equal, the less
           | time spent on bureaucratic processes, the better.
           | 
           | Its just so that governments (and academic institutions,
           | nonprofits, healthcare, etc.) are the natural environments
           | for bureaucratic bloat.
        
           | joenot443 wrote:
           | Same story in much of Canada.
        
           | boplicity wrote:
           | It's not even necessarily an American problem; when I lived
           | in Washington State, the last time I got a renewal was
           | expedient and surprisingly efficient. I was impressed with
           | how well run the place was.
        
             | [deleted]
        
       | jFriedensreich wrote:
       | its part of why i moved there from germany. its crazy how
       | especially germany treats its citizens time as an unlimited
       | resource without any respect what that could mean for peoples
       | lives. neurodivergence is especially amplified in such a system
       | if you have strong adhd or depression like me, 1 or 2 hours
       | paperwork per month is not just 2h but potentially weeks of
       | dreading and self hatred. knowing what life could have been like
       | it hurts to think of all the lost time but i am truly thankful i
       | can finally experience it. there needs to be something like a
       | human right to be left the fuck alone by your country if the task
       | can be done automatically or semi-automatically.
        
       | andix wrote:
       | In a lot of European countries there is a system to legally sign
       | documents with a digital signature. Either via SMS/App TAN - like
       | for online banking - or a smart card/HSM (mostly used by
       | corporations).
       | 
       | I think Austria moved even more services to the digital age then
       | Estonia. It is not fancy, nor modern. But a lot of documents
       | primarily exist only in a digital form (all laws, court files,
       | official documents, financial administration documents, ...).
       | They are often printed out, but they are just a random piece of
       | paper, just a "copy" of the original. The official and valid
       | version is the digitally signed PDF.
       | 
       | It is mostly implemented via some really boring and antiquated
       | Java Server Pages HTML forms, that are not always easy to use.
       | But they work nearly all the time, and once you send them you
       | immediately get a signed and legally binding confirmation that it
       | was filed.
       | 
       | The roots of the system go back to the early 2000s, and used
       | elliptical cryptography right from the start. Which was really
       | hard back then to deal with, because most libraries or
       | applications didn't support it yet. For example native Windows
       | support came only with Windows 7.
       | 
       | In Austria everyone and every company that has E-mail is required
       | to accept digital signatures. If you cancel your phone contract
       | with a signed PDF via E-Mail the company can't refuse to accept
       | it, as every court will instantly decide in your favour.
        
       | sdfhbdf wrote:
       | It does sound great when it works. It's awesome that Estonia
       | succeeded. I do believe this is a really hard problem -
       | digitising public services - to solve at scale.
       | 
       | Whenever you have bigger countries you almost always have several
       | levels of local governance - state, county or Land. These local
       | governments often work with full autonomy and do not share date
       | with the central government.
       | 
       | In this case even solving such simple and basic thing as a
       | centralised login solution is difficult since why would the owner
       | of the centralised login solution should have knowledge of which
       | citizen used which local governments service?
       | 
       | I believe that's why we see so many unfinished systems not
       | working together because they have to be built completely
       | separately by each local government since they operate in
       | autonomy.
        
         | skeletal88 wrote:
         | The success of our Estonian digitalized government services is
         | possible because we have:
         | 
         | A nationwide digital ID, that can be used to authenticate
         | someone,
         | 
         | We have a National Id Number for every citizen and residence
         | permit holder, that acts as a global foreign key for all the
         | services, the number alone can't be used for anything, is
         | public, and should not and is not used for authenticating
         | anyone.
         | 
         | The Id number enables the next thing: it is mandated by laws
         | that every type of information should only be stored once. My
         | name, date of birth, where I live and document photo is stored
         | in the citizens registry. If elections start then the local
         | municipality knows who are it's residents and everyone is sent
         | an e-mail or letter about where they can go to cast the vote.
         | If I want to renew my driver's license then I can choose to use
         | the photo I last used to get a new passport or Id document.
         | 
         | The one place to store one type of information is enabled by
         | the national id number, because we know exactly that this
         | person in this registry is the same one with the same number in
         | the other registry, even though they may have the same name and
         | date of birth, there is no possibility to confuse someone. And
         | this makes keeping data safe easier, because it's easier to
         | secure one database, than twenty ones that some random
         | government departments would otherwise have to store my name,
         | address or whatever else they would need. And their data would
         | be mostly out of date, since it would get updated only when I
         | interacted with them.
        
           | mindslight wrote:
           | > _We have a National Id Number for every citizen and
           | residence permit holder, that acts as a global foreign key
           | for all the services, the number alone can 't be used for
           | anything, is public, and should not and is not used for
           | authenticating anyone._
           | 
           | It's important to point out that a key part of this is having
           | personal privacy protection (eg GDPR) that prevents private
           | companies from abusing this identifier for their own
           | nefarious purposes. Without private protections, such an
           | identity number becomes a vulnerability for individuals. Like
           | in the United States as it stands, it's a _feature_ that
           | giving out your social security number might result in a huge
           | headache, otherwise every retailer would demand it for their
           | consumer surveillance ( "loyalty") programs etc.
        
             | skeletal88 wrote:
             | Even without my number the retailers know my e-mail or
             | whatever else I used to sign up for their loyality cards or
             | benefits, they already know what I buy. If they know my
             | personal number, then they can't know anything in addition
             | to what they would have without it.
             | 
             | But having strong protection for privacy is a must also.
             | 
             | Every time someone accesses my data in the national
             | registries the access is logged - who did it and when. For
             | example I can see that the city I live in is checking if I
             | still live there, because they offer free public transport
             | to residents. Also I can see that the doctor I visited
             | looked at my data, maybe also the aphotecary where I got my
             | prescribed medicine from, because.. all the prescriptions
             | are also digital documents, very-very rarely something is
             | put on paper (for example, when a vet doctor prescribes
             | some antibiotics and I can get them from the apothecary).
             | Othewise I just give them my id card, they look at the
             | number, type it in, and can see what I have been
             | prescribed.
        
           | argulane wrote:
           | Enabling ID card login for any random website usually only
           | requires adding few config lines to your app revrese proxy. I
           | wrote about it here
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33639317
        
         | colechristensen wrote:
         | Locally they completely redid the computer systems of the DMV a
         | few years back... And botched it. Everything started taking
         | twice as long and you wouldn't get a new license for weeks or
         | months after you went in.
        
         | spaniard89277 wrote:
         | In Spain they're trying... but not really succeeding.
         | 
         | > Whenever you have bigger countries you almost always have
         | several levels of local governance - state, county or Land.
         | These local governments often work with full autonomy and do
         | not share date with the central government.
         | 
         | Here this is particularly relevant with healthcare. In some
         | regions I get full coverage with my regional card with no
         | questions asked. In others I have to go through hoops, and
         | apparently they have no way of knowing my clinical history.
         | 
         | > In this case even solving such simple and basic thing as a
         | centralised login solution is difficult since why would the
         | owner of the centralised login solution should have knowledge
         | of which citizen used which local governments service?
         | 
         | In Spain they tried to solve this with DNIe (your national
         | identity card has a chip) and cetificates. Turns out it's quite
         | difficult to make it work for 99% of the people, and even if
         | you're tech savvy some government portals make it SO HARD that
         | you just want to give up.
         | 
         | In a job I had before they used VMs with Windows XP and
         | IExplorer for some services.
         | 
         | It improved a lot in last years, but the improvement is in
         | areas where you have to pay money, they've got fast for that.
         | Everything else is still a mess.
         | 
         | So in the end they'd come up with Cl@ave 365 with is a
         | login/password solution you have to set up in person into some
         | government office but it doesn't give you access to the full
         | catalog of services, so you still need DNIe/Certificate.
         | 
         | The thing is, they still get the money from you. Nobody gets
         | fired. Friendly contractors still get money. There's no rush to
         | improve. They have no incentives.
         | 
         | But the worst thing is that they have this mess going on, and
         | when old people goes to some government office they tell them
         | to go online and do their own thing.
         | 
         | Pretty much like companies. Feels nice to pay taxes for a
         | service isn't being provided.
         | 
         | There's people pushing to get this fixed, but the spanish state
         | is... like an angry elephant.
        
           | germandiago wrote:
           | Espana es un desastre. Yo me he ido. Y va a ser dificil que
           | vuelva. Vaya como esta el tema... de pena todo.
        
             | spaniard89277 wrote:
             | Podria ser mucho peor, el problema no es lo mal que esta,
             | el problema es que en terminos generales no mejora.
             | 
             | Hay paises en el este de Europa que claramente estan
             | progresando, sus estados, su economia, su sociedad.
             | 
             | Espana cada vez esta mas dividida, pobre, y su sociedad mas
             | tensionada.
        
         | germanier wrote:
         | Which is why countries like Germany roll out federated
         | decentralized login solutions - it's just a really slow process
         | due to (among many other factors) the humongous number of
         | stakeholders to involve.
        
       | orblivion wrote:
       | Did they somehow figure out online voting or are they courting
       | disaster here?
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | Multiple independent studies show there are vulnerabilities in
         | their system.
        
           | Avamander wrote:
           | Not to say everything is perfect, but I'd like to see those
           | credible studies.
        
             | giantg2 wrote:
             | Google search has many. Take your pick.
        
               | Avamander wrote:
               | Thought so.
        
               | giantg2 wrote:
               | If you thought so, then why post what you did?
        
       | blibble wrote:
       | personally I don't want voting done online or with any machine
       | involvement
       | 
       | at all, ever
        
       | superjan wrote:
       | ... and I bet they spent it on tiktok and instagram.
        
       | rcarr wrote:
       | Until there's a solar flare and instead it's just cost them 1640
       | years. Or a catastrophic computer virus. Or any number of black
       | swan disaster scenarios.
       | 
       | I'm a tech guy and I do think that this is good news. I just hope
       | that the people in charge of designing these systems have also
       | thought about what happens if these systems catastrophically
       | fail. And that measuring things like '820 years saved' are only
       | really claims you can make after waiting a long period of time to
       | ensure it's proven itself stable.
        
         | scottLobster wrote:
         | Black swan events affect non-digital information as well. How
         | many paper records have been lost to fire, floods and simple
         | decay over the millennia? At least with digital records there's
         | the chance that they're backed up offsite somewhere
        
           | rcarr wrote:
           | Personally I think the ideal system would include both. Maybe
           | a digital system that is periodically (say once a year)
           | transferred to tape and stored in a secure facility like the
           | Svalbard Seed Vault.
        
             | culturestate wrote:
             | _> Maybe a digital system that is periodically (say once a
             | year) transferred to tape and stored in a secure facility_
             | 
             | This has been standard procedure (not at Svalbard,
             | obviously, but at one or more secure offsite facilities)
             | for every critical data system I've ever personally
             | encountered in regulated industry, though rotations are
             | usually weekly/monthly rather than yearly.
        
               | kneebonian wrote:
               | > This has been standard procedure
               | 
               | Are they testing the backups and restoring from them
               | regularly, because if they aren't there isn't any backup
               | happening.
        
               | Dylan16807 wrote:
               | For this kind of system, probably very yes.
               | 
               | But I don't blame you for asking, when there are stories
               | of irreplaceable nuclear test data being stuffed on some
               | RAIDs and then nobody replacing the disk failures for
               | years and years...
        
               | rcarr wrote:
               | This is good to know. I've never had the privilege of
               | working on such a system so it is nice to know that this
               | kind of thing is actually happening. Especially when
               | government preparation for any potential pandemic seemed
               | to be piss poor right across the board.
        
             | germanier wrote:
             | After recognizing that risk, Estonia famously signed an
             | international treaty with Luxemburg "in the spirit of the
             | Vienna Convention" to host an offsite backup (and plans to
             | extend such initiatives).
             | 
             | https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/2280/3201/8002/Lux_Inf
             | o...
        
         | tapland wrote:
         | Isn't it all still stored digitally though? Paper tax forms
         | that have to be sent in are still processed to be read and
         | stored digitally, but it would be much easier to not have to
         | send the paper forms.
         | 
         | The solar storm will strike individual systems that aren't
         | connected as well.
        
         | kneebonian wrote:
         | This highlights one of the things I've recognized, for a long
         | time the digital existed beside the paper, the computer often
         | had problems and people knew things would have problems so they
         | would always have a manual paper backup. "The HR computer is on
         | the fritz and can get paychecks out, well wheel out the file
         | folders, and get everyone in HR some ballpoint pens because
         | they're here until midnight", but nowadays digital first really
         | means digital only, and we see the consequences of that when
         | people are no longer able to do rational or reasonable things
         | because the computer won't allow it.
         | 
         | "Sorry I know this document has to have your legal name, but
         | unfortunately the system can't handle a character with an
         | accent have you thought about changing your name instead?"
         | 
         | I mean I am starting to see more and more places, that don't
         | have a til or register, just a tablet and an app which sure
         | saves you some overhead, but if a backhoe decides to dig
         | through the fiber line, congratulations your shop just got shut
         | down until it works agian.
         | 
         | Now people will say "bad things could happen in the old days
         | to!" That is true, but the difference was if bad things
         | happened you generally had some measure of control and ability
         | to effect change and at least find some temporary stop gap, the
         | problem is now we have lost all autonomy because the shift to
         | digital has also meant loss of control and locality.
         | 
         | Back in the day if the power went out you could open up a
         | receipt book and a ledger and keep taking payments until it
         | came back on, now you can sit and twiddle your thumbs.
         | 
         | My point is if you are "digital first" that means you are
         | "digital only" and you sure as hell need to figure out a backup
         | quick because it turns out shooting magic beams of light,
         | across continents, has many more failure cases than a locked
         | file folder.
        
           | culturestate wrote:
           | _> if a backhoe decides to dig through the fiber line,
           | congratulations your shop just got shut down until it works
           | agian. ... Back in the day if the power went out you could
           | open up a receipt book and a ledger and keep taking payments
           | until it came back on, now you can sit and twiddle your
           | thumbs._
           | 
           | This is nothing a good UPS and a standby 5G modem couldn't
           | handle. Digital systems _can_ be made reliable and redundant,
           | but most people don't want to go through the effort (or
           | expense) to make it happen.
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | My thought is that adversarial state actors are the biggest
         | threat. Didn't Russia interfere with some of their services at
         | one point?
        
           | rcarr wrote:
           | Yes, considering they're on the doorstep of Russia and
           | Belarus this is a fairly likely scenario. If their power
           | utilities were targeted the way Ukraine's have been how many
           | of these systems are still going to be able to run? That said
           | if you've imposed martial law and men aren't allowed to leave
           | the country because they've got to stay and fight then at
           | least demand for your online passport service will have
           | dropped by at least 50%
        
             | Avamander wrote:
             | If things get targeted with physical attacks like that, you
             | won't be getting a passport internet or no internet, in
             | impacted areas. It will be the least of your concerns.
        
               | rcarr wrote:
               | The last sentence was a bit of dark humour mate, I
               | probably should have put a sarcasm tag on it. Probably
               | should have said 'on the plus side' which is a bit more
               | of a common way to start those kinds of jokes
        
         | chefandy wrote:
         | So much government data is temporal. Many already have strict
         | archiving guidelines that mandate destroying certainly classes
         | of documents after some number of years... many are single-
         | digit. Nobody needs a copy of which city councilman voted to
         | approve new speed bumps on Main St. 20 years ago, or your first
         | 2 rejected applications for permits to remodel your bathroom.
         | Most archivists are pretty aware of the problems with digital
         | storage and know how to mitigate it.
        
           | pasttense01 wrote:
           | There 87,576 governments in the U.S. [federal, state, county,
           | city, township, school district, special purpose district]
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_government_in_the_United.
           | ..
           | 
           | Only a very small percent have an archivist.
        
             | chefandy wrote:
             | Many have policies informed by them. Even the town hall in
             | the little 3k population town I grew up in had pretty
             | standard data retention/destruction processes.
        
         | ElKrist wrote:
         | Any modern society is relying on digital supports for most of
         | its administration. Estonia is just proposing more "frontends"
         | to its citizens. Not all of them decide to use it btw (article
         | mentions 46.9% of people use online voting)
         | 
         | So if we're talking about "black swan disaster scenarios" or
         | "catastrophic computer virus", I don't see any difference
         | between Estonia and other countries.
        
         | wiseowise wrote:
         | Oh yeah, because those problems wouldn't affect low tech
         | platforms at all.
        
       | jen729w wrote:
       | "Oh but this requires a government ID card and I'll never allow
       | that! Liberty, freedom, something!"
       | 
       | ...later...
       | 
       | "Hello sir, you've just started a new job. In order for that to
       | happen I'm going to need copies of your passport, driver's
       | licence, medicare card, citizenship certificate, and one recent
       | bank statement showing your full name and address." [Actual
       | experience of mine, recently. Australia.]
       | 
       | "Sure! Here they are, which random web portal that I've never
       | heard of would you like me to upload them to?"
        
       | Reason077 wrote:
       | I wonder how many years the US could save its citizens by
       | modernizing and digitizing the IRS, DMV, etc. Tens of thousands?
       | Hundreds of thousands?
        
         | icoder wrote:
         | US democracy could change by having a central registry of
         | everyone, ensuring everyone gets their voting pass
         | automatically, skipping the faulty and bumpy process of voter
         | registration amd inequality of identification-ability
        
           | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
           | The opposition to national registries and national ID here is
           | extremely strong.
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | The IRS/tax problem is one of corporate lobbying and partisan
         | politics (usually the proposals to reduce or eliminate tax
         | regulations are met by opposition).
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | I recently discovered that the U.S. Social Security
         | Administration has business hours ... for their website. They
         | operate a website that is closed at night and on weekends. One
         | is hard-pressed to imagine the level of IT dysfunction
         | necessary to reach this point.
        
           | eropple wrote:
           | I investigated that once, and I don't think it's IT
           | dysfunction in that case. My understanding (because I found
           | this odd as well) is that it's because the support load for
           | that site is so high, and the likelihood of abandoned
           | processes without support so high, that the best solution
           | they had at whatever point in time they instituted that was
           | business-hours operation.
        
           | minhazm wrote:
           | The Bangladesh Embassy in D.C. had a similar issue a few
           | years ago. They had a document you needed to fill out that
           | was just hosted on someones computer and when that person
           | would shut their computer down each night or over the weekend
           | the link would stop working. They've at least fixed that
           | since then.
        
             | baybal2 wrote:
        
           | anotherman554 wrote:
           | I have not researched this but rather than being a sign of IT
           | dysfunction my guess would be the government contracts out
           | the maintenance of the web site to the private sector and the
           | contract specs happen to be written to say it will be closed
           | on nights and weekends. In theory this makes the contract
           | cheaper than if the government was buying 24/7 support.
        
             | Eleison23 wrote:
             | It would seem to us that nights and weekends are the most
             | convenient time for citizens to access government services
             | such as this. But the things that are down for maintenance
             | are not our publicly-accessible frontends, they're the
             | backend databases that the administration uses internally
             | as well.
             | 
             | So it would seem that all the worker bees in government
             | offices rely on having access to those backend databases
             | during USA office hours, and the only time they can
             | realistically be shut down is while the civil servants are
             | off the clock.
        
               | jeffbee wrote:
               | I view a database that needs to go down for maintenance
               | as "IT dysfunction".
        
           | llanowarelves wrote:
           | IRS is same way: have to get EIN through form during business
           | hours.
           | 
           | Long ago, the Best Buy website also closed then opened during
           | business hours.
        
           | antihero wrote:
           | Probably so that there's no backlog buildup over the weekend?
        
             | jeffbee wrote:
             | Backlog of? You can go to SSA.gov and look at your
             | statements, but only if it's weekday business hours in the
             | lower 48, otherwise you cannot.
        
       | viburnum wrote:
       | Article didn't mention the best part:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Once-only_principle
       | 
       | Basically the government isn't allowed to ask you for any
       | information more than once. They already know!
        
         | andix wrote:
         | That sounds scary.
        
           | skeletal88 wrote:
           | Can you explain why?
           | 
           | Why would having every government department, hospital,
           | doctors/dentists office keep your data separately, probably
           | in some unsecured excel file or whatever?
           | 
           | When we have one registry for everything, they can keep it
           | secure by having some proper security guys design and audit
           | it, we can see who has accessed my data and when, etc. If a
           | hospital would keep your health records in their own system
           | then.. they'd probably have some low paid IT guy design
           | something and leak it accidentally online.
        
             | andix wrote:
             | Because I don't want them to connect all the data without
             | my consent. I don't want single government employees to
             | have access to all my data at once.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | alberth wrote:
       | Homeless / Underprivelleged?
       | 
       | How does moving things online work for those in poor economic
       | conditions since they might not have online access (no smart
       | phone, etc).
        
         | andix wrote:
         | You can still go to the office and do it in person. It also
         | comes with the benefit, that a lot of public offices can also
         | provide you with different services they couldn't do
         | previously. Before you needed to go to town A and get a
         | document, add it to the paperwork and file at town B. Now town
         | B can fetch the document in your name from town A, or town A
         | can file the document in your name at town B.
        
         | dottedmag wrote:
         | They can go to the local council / municipality and get the
         | help there (either computers they can use for free, or from the
         | clerks who can help them).
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | I think this just adds the option and doesn't eliminate the in-
         | person version.
        
           | skeletal88 wrote:
           | Correct. There are still physical offices where people can go
           | to do their stuff, with clerks sitting behind desks, etc.
           | Nobody is left out, doing stuff online is just an option 99%
           | people use.
        
         | andrewia wrote:
         | In addition to public computers and physical offices,
         | smartphones are owned by a large portion of homeless people
         | (especially if younger) because they're quite affordable. It
         | looks like a basic Estonian phone plan, plus financing for a
         | budget smartphone, is only 20 EUR/month. Estonia has no free
         | phone plan (like the "obamaphone" program in the US), but low
         | income people can submit 200 EUR of expenses per year for
         | essentials.
        
         | Avamander wrote:
         | There's basically always the option to use a library or its
         | WiFi. In the case of voting, one can just do it in person.
        
       | thsbrown wrote:
       | Estonia using KSI Blockchain for government networks seems
       | relevant here. I would love to get more info on the nitty gritty
       | of how it's being used specifically though. None the less it does
       | seem like a good use case of Blockchain tech.
       | 
       | [1] https://e-estonia.com/solutions/cyber-security/ksi-
       | blockchai...
        
       | jacooper wrote:
       | Another country that is using E-goverment effectively is Saudi
       | Arabia, almost everything is digital.
       | 
       | As for privacy, What is privacy? Do you have something to hide?/s
        
         | moffkalast wrote:
         | As if any other authoritarian regime throughout history with
         | analog paper bureaucracy ever had any problems finding anything
         | they needed. At least with file encryption there actually isn't
         | any way to bribe/threaten the clerk to show you the file.
        
       | beorno wrote:
       | Time wasted filling in forms and talking to service staff should
       | really be tracked and associated with the business or government
       | agency, then it's possible to actually assign a "bureaucracy/red-
       | tape tax" based on the hours they waste for people using the
       | service.
       | 
       | Without externalizing the cost of all the time wasted, it's just
       | too easy to push time-costs on to the consumers/citizens. It's
       | already a huge problem, and I suspect a major cause of loss of
       | productivity in the western world.
        
         | chrisseaton wrote:
         | > Time wasted filling in forms and talking to service staff
         | should really be tracked and associated with the business or
         | government agency
         | 
         | Isn't there a US law on this? The Paperwork Reduction Act?
        
           | gumby wrote:
           | Only for the federal government, and as far as I can tell
           | only for "regular people" forms. I.e. if you fill out an NSF
           | proposal or want to drill an oil well or fill out Form D for
           | a stock sale the forms don't seem to include any estimates.
           | 
           | I know the time required to fill out an NSF proposal is "how
           | long is a piece of string" but parts of it (some of the
           | financial portions) are as boilerplate as an IRS tax form.
        
             | chrisseaton wrote:
             | I don't get what's 'in it' for people to have overly
             | complicated forms. Like they have to store all the data and
             | in some cases manually input it (like customs forms.)
             | What's the benefit?
             | 
             | Ideally people would have a single universal identifier and
             | then I'd never need to put my date of birth or tax number
             | on another form again.
        
         | MonkeyMalarky wrote:
         | Even with the same amount of work or service provided, under-
         | staffing absolutely consumes and destroys peoples productivity.
         | What an awful waste it is to take the morning off work to go
         | somewhere like the DMV, wait forever in line and see half the
         | service counters empty. Sure, the government saved on some
         | staff salary but society lost more in productivity.
        
           | dpkirchner wrote:
           | And then those empty counters and slow service are used as
           | evidence that the government is incompetent and should have
           | its budget reduced further. It's a vicious cycle and I am
           | confident the reduced service is a deliberate attempt to
           | undermine confidence in government.
           | 
           | See also: bans on common-sense measures like including sales
           | tax in price tags, making it easier to pay income taxes.
        
             | chongli wrote:
             | _a deliberate attempt to undermine confidence in
             | government_
             | 
             | Yes. The strategy is known as "starve the beast" [1] and it
             | is pursued with ferocious determination by its proponents.
             | The goal is to create some kind of minimal government
             | libertarian paradise.
             | 
             | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast
        
               | notch656a wrote:
               | I thought starve the beast was where non-wartime federal
               | spending as a percent of GDP increased multiple times
               | over the past 100 year period. The beast to be starved
               | being the individual citizen and businesses.
               | 
               | Yes you can see, the beast has been horribly starved.
               | 
               | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYONGDA188S
        
               | piva00 wrote:
               | Looking at general spending doesn't tell you absolutely
               | anything _where_ the spending is going to and doesn 't
               | enable any kind of cost-benefit analysis. It's a
               | meaningless metric to derive any argument from.
               | 
               | Spending on services that are multipliers of productivity
               | is very different than spending on the military, for
               | example. Spending on public services that improves
               | citizens' life like healthcare, parks, schools, culture,
               | easiness of bureaucracy (e.g.: permits for construction,
               | licencing of activities, etc.) is a completely different
               | beast than spending on politicians benefits, military
               | drills, and so on.
        
               | notch656a wrote:
               | Ah so spending is a 'meaningless metric'. Weird you
               | didn't reply that to starve-the-beast OP.
        
               | piva00 wrote:
               | Starve the beast is about starving specific services with
               | the goal of dismantling them by causing a negative
               | sentiment in the public. Like what the Tories are doing
               | to the NHS, you start dismantling it by underfunding the
               | service, which forces cost-cutting (usually meaning
               | diminished staff or changes to regulations on benefits,
               | working hours, etc.).
               | 
               | Don't really understand your deflection and tone, it was
               | completely uncalled for and doesn't at all address the
               | point of my comment. Please, don't do that here on HN, I
               | come here to foster intelligent and interesting
               | discussions, not to read mindless hot takes and
               | deflections.
        
               | notch656a wrote:
               | >Don't really understand your deflection and tone
               | 
               | If you don't understand something, you admit what you say
               | below is a lie.
               | 
               | > it was completely uncalled for and doesn't at all
               | address the point of my comment
               | 
               | Here is a learning opportunity. If you don't understand
               | something, do not just shortcut to believing it was
               | uncalled for. The fact you don't understand makes it
               | clear you don't know whether it addresses your point.
        
               | piva00 wrote:
               | You're just a fucking asshole, aren't you?
        
           | Gud wrote:
           | To play devils advocate - sometimes the system itself is not
           | just broken, it's completely wrong! Where I'm from(Sweden) I
           | can't imagine going to the DMV even for just a second. So
           | asking for better staffing at the service counters at the DMV
           | sounds silly to me
        
             | tablespoon wrote:
             | > To play devils advocate - sometimes the system itself is
             | not just broken, it's completely wrong! Where I'm
             | from(Sweden) I can't imagine going to the DMV even for just
             | a second. So asking for better staffing at the service
             | counters at the DMV sounds silly to me
             | 
             | Do you not have driving tests in Sweden? Does Sweden allow
             | residents to submit any random picture of their choice for
             | their drivers license?
             | 
             | As an American, the only times I have to go to the DMV are
             | when I have renew my license (every 4-5 year), and that
             | seems mainly to take a (simple) vision test and get my
             | photo taken. They also give tests to new drivers and people
             | moving in from out of state.
        
               | piva00 wrote:
               | Any time I had to go to Traffikverket (equivalent to the
               | DMV), Skatteverket (tax agency, your IRS) or Polisen (the
               | police, to get passports or national IDs) which are the
               | only 3 agencies that I had ever to interact with to get
               | pictures collected from, I book an appointment online for
               | a time slot; I show up 10-15 min before my scheduled time
               | and wait for the call for my booking; Go in, talk to
               | someone, take pictures/collect fingerprints and get out.
               | 
               | It's very, very easy.
        
           | calvinmorrison wrote:
           | I bet you USAA's Insurance run DMV would be a lot more
           | efficient and have good customer service, but hey, we don't
           | want any Ayn Rands around here
        
             | colechristensen wrote:
             | AAA does run some DMVs and the service is considerably
             | better in my experience.
        
               | whafro wrote:
               | They do this here in Massachusetts, but they aren't full-
               | service. I just bought out my lease, and have to go to a
               | real DMV to process the title.
               | 
               | When you only have to handle the simple stuff, it's much
               | easier to make it a great experience. AAA is basically
               | the EZPass lane for the DMV.
               | 
               | That's not to say that a full-service DMVs shouldn't be
               | significantly better in most cases, though.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | te_chris wrote:
             | How anyone alive today can think that is beyond me.
             | Everytime I call anything these days I get 3 minutes of
             | disclaimers about why I should use their website or app
             | instead and a pre-recorded sob story about being really
             | busy etc etc just to try and break me before I even get
             | into a queue to be connected to someone. 2022 is a
             | dehumanising time to be alive and just get the most basic
             | shit done.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | AyyWS wrote:
             | I worked for a private company contracted to provide a
             | portion of a public service and later got employed by the
             | the government agency.
             | 
             | - The contractor had no budget. Our servers were out of
             | date and we were running out of date OSes and software. We
             | were all paid below standard and overworked.
             | 
             | - We had a tiny budget at the agency to buy things at the
             | very end of the year. We ran up to date software and OSes,
             | except for a few large complicated systems that were setup
             | with grant money. We were all paid well below standard. I
             | was no longer on call at all times of the day and night.
             | 
             | Contract awards go to the lowest bidder.
        
               | pifm_guy wrote:
               | But if the lowest bidder has some kind of penalty to pay
               | if average queueing time goes over 15 minutes or random
               | members of the public rate the service provided below 3/5
               | stars, then they'll do a much better job.
        
               | feet wrote:
               | That doesn't exist because those contracts are awarded to
               | friends of politicians. You don't penalize a friend, do
               | you?
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | derefr wrote:
             | Here in British Columbia, Canada, our equivalent of the DMV
             | is run by a Crown Corporation, ICBC. I've never had a
             | problem with the wait times. (Mind you, they generally
             | require you to pre-reserve a general timeslot to come in;
             | so, like a restaurant, they can just say they're full for a
             | given half-hour and push people to coming in earlier/later.
             | That by itself fixes a lot of the issues around wait
             | times.)
        
             | IncRnd wrote:
             | Why don't we want Ayn Rands around here?
             | 
             | Where I live that's exactly what we have. We have a number
             | of privately owned tag agencies that handle most requests
             | which don't require an in-person visit to the DMV (like a
             | new photo id).
             | 
             | This is fast and takes far less time than visiting the DMV.
             | The various DMVs are bloated beasts with too-large budgets,
             | yet they can't seem to staff people at all their windows.
        
             | ambicapter wrote:
             | Why do you think that? Businesses cut staffing just as much
             | as governments do. They already got your money, why would
             | they care about spending more money on you when they know
             | it's a pain in the ass to switch to another "provider"?
        
         | idiotsecant wrote:
         | A major loss of productivity? I think maybe i've spent an hour
         | at the DMV in the past 10 years. I spend maybe an hour or two
         | each year doing my taxes. I struggle to think of a single other
         | case where my time is consumed with dealing with any kind of
         | bureaucracy. I'm not convinced it's a major problem.
        
           | myroon5 wrote:
           | IRS stated the average American spends 13 hours every year
           | dealing with tax filing:
           | 
           | https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-
           | checker/post/claim...
        
           | Xeoncross wrote:
           | It's great when it works right?
           | 
           | Woe to you people off the golden path.
        
             | idiotsecant wrote:
             | Isn't that true of every system ever?
        
           | ericmcer wrote:
           | You probably fall into that group of people who the
           | government loves, just work your W2 job, autopay taxes
           | without feeling the real loss of the money and don't raise
           | any fuss. If you try to start your own business, hire
           | employees or do contract work you will find it is a total
           | nightmare.
        
           | IncRnd wrote:
           | For each hundred million people, your 1-2 hours pear year is
           | 100,000,000 to 200,000,000 hours per year.
        
             | thfuran wrote:
             | Okay, but increasing state and federal government staffing
             | levels by a few percent to try to save that time would cost
             | more than 100,000,000 hours per year.
        
               | Avamander wrote:
               | If you want to speed it up with staff, if. The point of
               | the article is that you don't have to waste nearly as
               | much human time at all, if you have a working electronic
               | identity and goverment services.
        
               | thfuran wrote:
               | Oh, I thought this was under the comment about
               | understaffing, but I see now that it isn't.
        
           | vondur wrote:
           | Come to here in SoCAl. It's a few hours to get anything done.
        
           | Avamander wrote:
           | An hour or two each year? That's a lot of wasted time.
           | Especially if you add it all up across the country.
        
             | 0xffff2 wrote:
             | 0.02% (i.e. 0.0002) of your waking hours wasted doing taxes
             | every year? That really seems like a lot?
        
               | Avamander wrote:
               | Yes, because I spend 10 minutes a year.
        
               | 0xffff2 wrote:
               | So what? I waste far more time every year browsing Hacker
               | News than I ever have dealing with government
               | bureaucracy. The difference between 0.02% and 0% is
               | indistinguishable in reality.
        
         | nixass wrote:
         | Waiting for Germany to do this. We'll save few thousand years
         | by doing so
        
         | notch656a wrote:
         | Where I live private businesses can act as agents of BMV. IT
         | creates an economic incentive for productivity and pleasantness
         | because the customers are not captive to this business and
         | since they are in competition and profit from each license,
         | they try to make the process as efficient as possible.
         | Meanwhile go to an actual BMV and no fucks are given because
         | there is literally no economic incentive to move along nor be
         | nice to you.
        
       | efitz wrote:
       | Much government interaction in the US (at all levels- federal,
       | state, local, court) is ultimately about revenue.
       | 
       | Adopting a single, simple (in terms of complexity) revenue model
       | per polity would eliminate much interaction. For example a 20%
       | flat income tax with a $25000 deduction would allow the IRS to
       | pre-fill your return on a post card. Eliminating "fines as a
       | revenue stream" would dramatically reduce local court and LE
       | interactions. Reducing permitting, etc.
       | 
       | Not only would the citizen experience improve but we would also
       | need less government resources.
       | 
       | Of course, there are reasons why we do all these things, but we
       | rarely if ever revisit implemented government programs to see if
       | they are meeting their goals and if their cost exceeds their
       | benefit.
       | 
       | Given that, I much more support "less government" rather than
       | "the same amount of government but most of it online".
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-11-30 23:02 UTC)