[HN Gopher] The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds
        
       Author : ksangeelee
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2021-05-30 21:46 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (scatter.wordpress.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (scatter.wordpress.com)
        
       | tobyhinloopen wrote:
       | Neat.
       | 
       | The longest possible game is playing with family that don't like
       | or don't know the rules and like to put money on free parking.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | That's when you sneeze or find some other reason to bump the
         | table hard enough to lose the places of all of the pieces.
         | "Ooops, I guess we'll have to pick this game up later"
        
           | function_seven wrote:
           | Be the banker, embezzle the hell out of the bank, never worry
           | about making rent. Eventually you'll be discovered: "Hey!
           | You're cheating!"
           | 
           | "Huh? I thought that's what this game was about. Y'all
           | started it with that Free Parking nonsense."
        
       | awb wrote:
       | Anyone want to roughly calculate the odds of this actually
       | happening?
        
         | tobyhinloopen wrote:
         | 0 in practice, who decides to buy nothing? And even if player
         | one declines to buy, player two can buy it via the auction.
        
           | awb wrote:
           | Sure for Player 1, but if Player 2 reduces their cash by
           | buying properties that still results in a loss. The premise
           | is creating so much rent on Boardwalk that player 2 can't
           | afford it.
        
           | dorkwood wrote:
           | My sister often buys nothing. She has this weird idea that
           | certain colors and utilities aren't worth buying. I beat her
           | every time with my "buy literally everything" strategy.
        
         | whatshisface wrote:
         | The specific sequence of rolls has 5 doubles (which can only
         | occur one way) and 4 unequal pairs (which can occur two ways).
         | Each double has a 1/36 chance of happening while the unequal
         | pairs have a 1/18 chance. So that's 1/36^5 * 1/18^4 =
         | 1/6,347,497,291,776 or about 1.5 times ten to the minus
         | thirteen.
         | 
         | It's interesting that the last four digits of the denominator
         | of the probability of the shortest game of Monopoly are 1776.
         | I'm sure that has some kind of cosmic significance.
        
           | tobyhinloopen wrote:
           | Nice, thanks
        
           | awb wrote:
           | And don't forget that Player 2 most also pick an "advance to
           | Boardwalk" card out of a shuffled deck.
        
             | 988747 wrote:
             | And the Player 1 has to get "Bank error in your favor,
             | Collect $200" in their first turn, otherwise they will lack
             | $50 to buy 5 houses in turn 2 (which I assume is
             | significant in raising rent for Boardwalk to $1400)
        
             | choeger wrote:
             | According to the law of cosmic improbabilities, it just
             | _has_ to happen in that Case.
             | 
             | To quote Terry Pratchett:
             | 
             | > Scientists have calculated that the chances of something
             | so patently absurd actually existing are millions to one.
             | But magicians have calculated that million-to-one chances
             | crop up nine times out of ten.
        
         | lysozyme wrote:
         | If we say it's nine rolls of two dice, and the probability of
         | getting any particular pair of numbers in each roll is 1/36
         | (underestimate since we sometimes only care about the sum),
         | then getting any specified sequence would be like (1/36)^9,
         | around 1e-14. Of course then we'd have to get the gameplay
         | right too
        
       | simlevesque wrote:
       | The Youtube comment are saying that this requires players to make
       | completely irrational moves and I agree
        
         | tobyhinloopen wrote:
         | I also agree but it's still _possible_ in theory
        
         | onychomys wrote:
         | The comments of the article are full of people coming up with
         | ways to play entirely rationally and still end the game in 8
         | moves, they're worth reading.
        
       | CapriciousCptl wrote:
       | If you drop some presumptions about the players you can go even
       | faster--
       | 
       | Player 1: Roll a 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 or 12. Don't purchase, so it
       | goes to auction. In auction player 2 buys for 100% of their cash.
       | 
       | Player 2: Rolls a 4, lands on income tax. Game over.
        
         | cortesoft wrote:
         | You would pay 10% of your wealth for income tax, so you could
         | always mortgage your one property and pay the 10% of the
         | mortgage value.
        
         | koolba wrote:
         | You'd be surprised how few people know about the rule for
         | auctioning property that is not purchased. I'm guessing most
         | people learned to play without reading the actual rules. It's
         | just passed down by copying the actions of your older siblings.
        
           | Cyykratahk wrote:
           | Exactly, even this run is using house rules, as the official
           | rules state that you are required to own all properties of
           | the same colour before building, and also that houses must be
           | built evenly on each property.
        
             | juped wrote:
             | this isn't true about either the blog post (buys boardwalk
             | and park place, purchases houses evenly on this complete
             | property group) or the comment above (no houses or hotels
             | are involved)
        
             | cortesoft wrote:
             | The blog buys both BW and PP, and buys houses evenly.
        
         | Jyaif wrote:
         | Well played! And this strategy is actually easy to execute.
         | 
         | The probability for executing this strategy is:
         | P(3)+P(5)+P(6)+P(8)+P(9)+P(11)+P(12) * P(4).
         | 
         | Plug in the numbers from
         | https://statweb.stanford.edu/~susan/courses/s60/split/node65...
         | 
         | (0.0556+0.1111+0.1389+0.1389+0.1111+0.0556+0.278)*0.0833 =
         | 0.07407036
         | 
         | So 7.4%.
        
         | Someone wrote:
         | You don't even need that second roll. If, in that auction, a
         | player bids more than the cash they have, they go bankrupt
         | immediately (https://www.hasbro.com/common/instruct/monins.pdf
         | doesn't say such bids are disallowed, and does say "The buyer
         | pays the Bank the amount of the bid in cash" and "You are
         | declared bankrupt if you owe more than you can pay either to
         | another player or to the Bank.")
         | 
         | This can happen after the first player rolled a double, so the
         | first player's turn doesn't even have to be over for a player
         | to go bankrupt.
        
       | cryptoz wrote:
       | My favorite monopoly games are those where the players have
       | played together before, and agree on a set of custom rules to the
       | game in advance, and are fast-paced. I remember having rules
       | added like loans and interest, and effectively unlimited freedom
       | to make deals with players. Deals logged on paper, loan interest
       | measured in turns and percentages, so much...fun. Actual fun
       | though.
       | 
       | A game like this can even go fast paced where the next player is
       | making their turn while you're still interacting with the bank
       | from your turn, while someone else is calculating interest.
       | 
       | Doesn't sound fun typing it out but it was a blast.
        
       | 867-5309 wrote:
       | I'd be interested to see / write an algorithm for this
        
       | jaredsohn wrote:
       | [2010]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-05-30 23:00 UTC)