https://scatter.wordpress.com/2010/05/30/the-shortest-possible-game-of-monopoly-21-seconds/ Skip to content [newscatterlogo2notext-1] scatterplot the unruly darlings of public sociology The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds OK, since no one is posting, you get to endure another Monopoly post! After our recent attempt to play the shortest actual game of Monopoly on record, we started to wonder about what the shortest THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE game of Monopoly would be. That is, if everything went just the right way, with just the right sequence of rolls, Chance and Community Chest cards, and so on, what is the quickest way one player could go bankrupt? After working on the problem for a while, we boiled it down to a 4-turn (2 per player), 9 roll (including doubles) game. Detail on each move given below. If executed quickly enough, this theoretical game can be played in 21 seconds (see video below). Player 1, Turn 1: Roll: 6-6, Lands on: Electric Company Action: None, Doubles therefore roll again Roll: 6-6, Lands on: Illinois Avenue Action: None, Doubles therefore roll again Roll: 4-5, Lands on: Community Chest "Bank error in your favor, Collect $200" Action: Collects $200 (now has $1700) Player 2, Turn 1: Roll: 2-2, Lands on: Income Tax Action: Pay $200 (now has $1300), Doubles therefore rolls again Roll: 5-6, Lands on: Pennsylvania Rail Road Action: None Player 1, Turn 2: Roll: 2-2, Lands on: Park Place Action: Purchase ($350, now has $1350), Doubles therefore rolls again Roll: 1-1, Lands on: Boardwalk Action: Purchase ($400, now has $950), Doubles therefore rolls again Roll: 3-1, Lands on Baltic Avenue Action: Collect $200 for passing GO (now has $1150), Purchase 3 houses for Boardwalk, 2 for Park Place ($1000, now has $150) Player 2, Turn 2: Roll: 3-4, Lands on: Chance, "Advance to Boardwalk" Action: Advance to Boardwalk, Rent is $1400, only has $1300 = Bankrupt GAME OVER Share this: * Twitter * Facebook * Like this: Like Loading... Related [86c58]Author DJMPosted on May 30, 2010Categories Uncategorized 121 thoughts on "The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds" 1. [0f52] jeremy says: May 31, 2010 at 5:04 pm Hmm. I thought, "Come on, Dan! Clearly this can be shortened." But, lo, I cannot see how. I look forward to the shortest possible game of Risk. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply 1. [7cff] gatinh0 says: June 7, 2010 at 10:28 pm Official Monopoly rules: "If he does not wish to buy the MONOPOLY property it is sold at auction by the Banker to the highest bidder." The following properties were landed on and went unpurchased and didn't go through an auction either (which is a rule violation): Winning Player: Electric Company Illinois Avenue Baltic Avenue Loosing Player Pensylvania Railroad What the looser purchases is irrelevant since he is destined to go bankrupt anyway... But the winning player would have either spent some of his money, and therefore wouldn't be able to afford the houses to bankrupt player 2 or they would have had an auction which would have taken up more time. If you want to be stupid about it... which they already were since the players weren't buying valid properties... I can legally bankrupt player 2 on his first role, and accomplish it in 5 seconds (I didn't make a video, but I did it). Player 1: rolls a 1:2, lands on Baltic avenue, doesn't want it, declares auction. Player two offers $1450 for it. Player 1 declines, player 2 tosses the cash and gets the card, and now has only $50. Player 2 roles a 1:1 and lands on community chest "Pay School Tax: $150" Player 2 bankrupt. Game over... legally. LikeLiked by 2 people Reply 1. [86c5] blue monster says: June 7, 2010 at 11:09 pm Several people have pointed out this auctioning thing, but it's not right. Someone doesn't HAVE to buy it. All players can refuse to bid. The property goes unsold. We didn't bid. Auction over. The wild auctioning have been taken up previously as well-and I think that is completely valid. Likewise, someone else pointed out an even shorter, completely legal, strategy on another blog which is that one player just immediately quits! Nothing in the rule preventing that! LikeLike 2. [3fef] madmarten says: June 18, 2010 at 11:15 am One optional rule of monopoly is that no player may purchase properties until passing Go. This is a common rule at my house. LikeLiked by 2 people 2. [0f52] jeremy says: May 31, 2010 at 5:13 pm (Although, when you write this up for publication, I think the proper move for Player 2 is to pay the 10% rather than the $200 on Income Tax, even though it isn't enough to save her/him.) LikeLike Reply 3. [86c5] blue monster says: May 31, 2010 at 5:36 pm You are absolutely correct about the income tax. I can't believe we missed that after everything we went through to get it down to this point. And, while there are obviously other ways to do this in the same number of rolls, I also can't think of how to get it shorter than this. Risk, Parcheesi, Life, Candyland...the possibilities are endless... LikeLike Reply 1. [e445] theunclebob says: June 1, 2010 at 11:34 pm Two things - actually, current Monopoly boards have the income tax as $200 - 10% is not an option. Second, when you land on an unowned property, "none" isn't a realistic action. If the player who lands on a property chooses to not buy it, the property goes up for auction (if, of course, you're playing by the rules). While it *is* possible that no one would buy the property, even for a $1, I don't think it's very likely. If we're going to consider unrealistic possibilities, consider this: Player 1, Turn 1: Player rolls anything that lands them onto a property. Doesn't buy it - it auctions. Both players bid until Player 2 bids $1,500. P2 gets the propert. Player 2, Turn 1: Player 2 rolls and lands on Income Tax (on a current board) and has to pay $200. Game over. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply 1. [86c5] blue monster says: June 2, 2010 at 4:10 am Very good! I'm definitely going to remember your strategy the next time I want to get out of a Monopoly game quickly! Using insane auctioning, I think I can do you one better though: Player 1 rolls double 4s-landing on Vermont-declines to buy and auctioning begins. Since you can bid on a property you declined to buy, the auctioning continues and Player 1 ends up buying Vermont for $1500. Then the second roll based on doubles is a 4-5, community chest and its any card where you have to pay. Player 1 is bankrupt and Player 2 never even had a turn! LikeLike 2. [86c5] blue monster says: June 2, 2010 at 4:35 am I also think you can do the same thing without landing on any actual properties, thus eliminating auctioning: P1: 5-5 Jail, 6-6 Chance, 5-6 Community Chest P2: 5-5 Jail, 4-3 Comm Chest (pay 150) LikeLike 3. [533b] walesmd says: June 8, 2010 at 3:13 pm @blue monster You Player 1 bankruptcy isn't realistic (as unrealistic as this all is). The auctioning doesn't begin until the landing player opts to *not* buy the property. Why then, would this player decide to purchase it within the auction process for a much more expensive price. Although, I guess he could be trying to get it for cheaper (doesn't buy it, and Player 2 is only willing to risk $1 on the purchase, so Player 1 gets it for $2). LikeLike 4. [e445] theunclebob says: June 8, 2010 at 5:33 pm @walesmd - It *is* possible. I've let stuff go to auction thinking I could shave a few bucks off when another player decides to drive the price up. Now, it is *unlikely* that the price would get driven up to $1,500... ;) LikeLike 4. [6aab] Kieran says: May 31, 2010 at 7:29 pm The hidden assumption here is that the rules are being followed. In my family it was perfectly possible to have games of Monopoly that ran a good deal shorter than 21 seconds given the propensity of some players to steal all your money or turn the board upside down or throw your top hat down the stairs. To be honest I'd always thought the real purpose of Monopoly was not so much to be a proper board game but rather to serve as a focus for sibling conflict. LikeLike Reply 1. [86c5] blue monster says: June 2, 2010 at 4:04 am Indeed. The quickest game I ever played was the one where I caught my brother hiding a couple of $500 bills under his corner of the board before the game even started! LikeLike Reply 5. [36f3] gilescb says: June 6, 2010 at 12:37 pm Without insane auctioning, but by allowing P2 to purchase a property, you can do a bit better: P1,T1 (same as above; 3 turns) P2,T1 3-4 -> Chance -> Advance to Illinois Action: Purchase Illinois (-$240, but effective -$120 because of ability to mortgage: total: $1380) P1,T2 2-2 Park Place, purchase 6-4 Chance (+$200 for passing GO), advance to Boardwalk, purchase property and houses P2,T2 6-6 Chance Action: Pay $50 to each player (total $1330) 1-2 Boardwalk; GAME 8 turns instead of the above 9 Cool post. LikeLike Reply 1. [86c5] blue monster says: June 6, 2010 at 2:20 pm Brilliant! I doff my cap to you, sir! LikeLike Reply 1. [e421] jdwblahblah says: June 7, 2010 at 2:11 pm Faster perhaps. But less likely. Four and a half times less likely than the 9 move version... (once every 1,184,866,161,131,520.00 trials) LikeLike 2. [36f3] gilescb says: June 8, 2010 at 9:19 am Well, roll #7 is completely irrelevant as long as it's a double in the 2-2 to 6-6 range; and the Chance card doesn't matter. I guess that was just icing, because P2 is already low enough on cash before hitting that final chance. Still, even considering that, it's less likely. LikeLike 2. [e8aa] alexeigalaxy says: June 7, 2010 at 7:10 pm Here's another way that takes only 8 moves and two turns per player, and does not require Boardwalk and Park Place. In fact, neither player touches the fourth side of the board. Also, there are no insane auctions, and Player 2 does not get to make any decisions at all about buying property. Player 1, Turn 1: 1-1 -> Community Chest, Bank Error in Your Favor, collect $200 (Player 1 now at $1700). Doubles, so roll again. 5-3 -> Visiting Jail. Player 2, Turn 1: 3-1 -> Income Tax, Pay $200 (Player 2 now at $1300, or $1350 if 10% of assets ($150) is allowed as in the older games - it really doesn't matter). Player 1, Turn 2: 3-3 -> St. James Place, Buy for $180 (Player 1 now at $1520). Doubles, so roll again. 1-1 -> Tennessee Avenue, Buy for $180 (Player 1 now at $1340). Doubles, so roll again. 3-1 -> Chance, Go Back 3 Spaces -> New York Avenue, Buy for $200 (Player 1 now at $1140). At the end of his turn, Player 1 puts 4 houses on St. James Place ($400), 3 houses on Tennessee Avenue ($300), and 4 houses on New York Avenue ($400), for a total cost of $1100 (Player 1 now at $40 cash on hand). Player 2, Turn 2: 6-6 -> St. James Place, with 4 houses is $750 (Player 2 now at $550 or $600, depending on the income tax square). Doubles, so roll again. 2-1 -> New York Avenue, with 4 houses is $800. GAME. There are several variations to this sequence of events that ultimately produce the same result. Player 1's first turn could be land on Community Chest, get Advance to Go Collect $200, then get a 6-4 to visit jail. Or, after obtaining $200 from Community Chest via bank error or going to go, visiting jail could be reached by doubles (4-4 in my original scenario or 5-5 in the alternate scenario). In this case, a 4-2 or 5-1 gets St. James on Player 1's first turn, and he/she simply buys Tennessee Avenue and New York Avenue via the same rolls and methods as listed above in his/her second turn. And yes, I spent way too much time figuring this all out. Oh well, I really enjoyed thinking about it - excellent idea for a post! LikeLike Reply 1. [0f52] jeremy says: June 7, 2010 at 7:29 pm This is elegant insofar as it gets to the end in 8 moves without requiring any bad decisions either in prospect or retrospect by the losing player. LikeLike 2. [86c5] blue monster says: June 7, 2010 at 11:05 pm Gorgeous solution! I love it! LikeLike 3. [9bce] fruey says: June 17, 2010 at 6:57 am This certainly looks like the most elegant solution. The proviso in all the fast games is that people are actually suicidal: not keeping any capital for further property purchases. That early in the game it's unlikely, but in later stages of the game improving your properties in the hope of a windfall is decidedly more prevalent. Especially if you've got a few squares that are going to bankrupt you anyway, and there is nothing left to buy except houses. One interesting tactic is for two players deciding not to build hotels. That can lead to a shortage of houses, blocking those further behind in development from buying any - you have a finite number of houses in the set. Well worth it when you're against the in-laws. LikeLike 6. Pingback: Monopoly Speedrun | Superlevel 7. Pingback: The Shortest Monopoly Game Ever [Video] 8. Pingback: Birthdays of the Week -- Happy Birthday From QR and QRDeals! | QRDeals.com 9. Pingback: Das kurzeste Monopolyspiel ever << Dressed Like Machines 10. Pingback: Anyone Up for a Quick Game of Monopoly?? << Dog and Pony Show - The good parts of the internets, all in one place. 11. [a4b4] Chris Taylor says: June 7, 2010 at 1:45 pm Thought you might like to know that this is now linked on MetaFilter: http://www.metafilter.com/92602/There-can-be-only-one LikeLike Reply 12. [e421] jdwblahblah says: June 7, 2010 at 2:03 pm Since I'm sure you were curious about the odds of this particular game taking place if we allow one to get, e.g the 7 in P2T2 any which way (one in 6 rolls), and taking chance as 1 in 16, then 1 in 15 (there are 16 chance cards), it's: 1/36*36*9*16*36*18*36*36*18*6*15. That's once every 253,899,891,671,040 games. (once in every 250 trillion games or so) LikeLike Reply 1. [86c5] blue monster says: June 7, 2010 at 11:10 pm See now, this is the kind of serious, important content that can be derived from something a frivolous as the original post! LikeLike Reply 1. [36f3] gilescb says: June 8, 2010 at 9:26 am So this leads to the question of what is the total probability (_all_ the ways) that P1 could defeat P2 without P2 having any choice in the matter (i.e., without the option to buy any properties, etc.). Which would be a much harder question to answer. LikeLike 2. [94f4] mondaynightfights says: June 17, 2010 at 5:14 am thank you for the number crunching it makes it seem even more surreal LikeLike Reply 13. [5548] grahams says: June 7, 2010 at 2:50 pm In addition to the people commenting about the land auction rules above, I also remember a rule that you couldn't actually buy property until you went around the board once. It could be that this was a house rule, but my memory is telling me otherwise. LikeLike Reply 1. [86c5] blue monster says: June 7, 2010 at 3:05 pm To my knowledge, that is an common house rue, but it is not part of the official monopoly rules: http://www.hasbro.com/ common/instruct/monins.pdf LikeLike Reply 14. Pingback: Monopoly in 21 Sekunden | janwessel.de 15. Pingback: Interesting Reading #505 - Make perfect french fries, The problem with iPad apps, Freegans, hackers, half-human hybrids, Super-reactors and much more... - The Blogs at HowStuffWorks 16. [8b85] parrotperson says: June 8, 2010 at 3:32 am Even in your own example, the second roll of player 2, turn 1 is unnecessary. The first roll can be 1-3 instead of 2-2, thereby ending the turn since it isn't a double. And on player 2's second turn, s/he can still land on Chance and be directed to Boardwalk. LikeLike Reply 17. [8b85] parrotperson says: June 8, 2010 at 3:41 am For more realism in your example, so that no properties go unpurchased: player 1, turn 1, roll 1 could be 5-5, placing them on visiting Jail. Roll 2 could be 6-6, placing them on Chance (doesn't really matter what card they get as long as it doesn't move them backwards or cost them too much). Roll 3 could be 5-6, still placing them on Community Chest. Player 2, turn 1, roll 1 would then be 1-3, ending their turn. LikeLike Reply 18. Pingback: Monopoly in Rekordzeit spielen << AdClicks-Agent.de 19. [861f] ez569x says: June 8, 2010 at 4:46 pm Don't forget you can only buy houses/hotels at the beginning of your turn; not in the middle of doubles. LikeLike Reply 1. [e445] theunclebob says: June 8, 2010 at 5:36 pm Not correct. Per official rules, you can buy houses and hotels at any time *except* during another player's turn. So, anytime during your own turn or in between the turns of other players. LikeLike Reply 1. [861f] ez569x says: June 8, 2010 at 7:32 pm well, per the rules we're both wrong http:// www.hasbro.com/common/instruct/monins.pdf HOUSES... When you own all the properties in a color-group you may buy houses from the Bank and erect them on those properties. If you buy one house, you may put it on any one of those properties. The next house you buy must be erected on one of the unimproved properties of this or any other complete color-group you may own. The price you must pay the Bank for each house is shown on your Title Deed card for the property on which you erect the house. The owner still collects double rent from an opponent who lands on the unimproved properties of his/her complete color-group. Following the above rules, you may buy and erect at any time as many houses as your judgement and financial standing will allow. LikeLike 20. Pingback: Theoretically, the shortest game of Monopoly ever. If you have time on your hands, like these guys, click here to find out more. | Poor Little Rich Girls 21. Pingback: dustbury.com >> Not much Chance 22. Pingback: Shortest possible game of monopoly << ConstitutionClub.org 23. Pingback: Life of Alan >> links for 2010-06-08 24. Pingback: The Great Geek Manual >> Geek Media Round-Up: June 8, 2010 25. Pingback: Geek Media Round-Up: June 9, 2010 - Grasping for the Wind 26. Pingback: Hello world! | The Monopoly Nerd's Blog! 27. Pingback: Fastest Theoretical Game! | The Monopoly Nerd's Blog! 28. Pingback: Top Posts -- WordPress.com 29. Pingback: Monopoly << Johnny ist ein toller Name 30. [b0aa] krusta80 says: June 10, 2010 at 11:55 am I found a 7-roll solution! P1: 5,5 -> just visiting 6,6 -> adv to nearest utility (1350) 5,4 -> buy park place (1000) P2: 3,1 -> income tax (1350) P1: 1,1 -> buy boardwalk (600) 2,1 -> Bank error +200 (1000) Three houses on Boardwalk, Two houses on Park Place (0) P2: 2,1 -> Advanced to Boardwalk (GAME OVER) I also found a solution involving the light purples in eight rolls (see my blog here on wordpress)! LikeLike Reply 1. [b0aa] krusta80 says: June 10, 2010 at 11:56 am http://monopolynerd.wordpress.com LikeLike Reply 1. [86c5] blue monster says: June 17, 2010 at 7:40 am Following up on this excellent work by Monopoly Nerds, we came up with a couple of other 7-roll games. LikeLike 31. Pingback: June 11: Elsewhere with the actuaries << Actuarial Opinions 32. Pingback: Best Web Junk (June 11) << Jeremy's Weblog 33. Pingback: 21 Seconds << MRod says: 34. Pingback: sobre tecnologia >> Blog Archive >> Monopoly Express 35. Pingback: La partida mas rapida de Monopoly [ENG] 36. Pingback: Weekend link dump for June 13 - Off the Kuff 37. Pingback: The World's Fastest Game of Monopoly: 21 seconds | Web Watch by Web Gangsta 38. Pingback: 21 Seconds << Mrs. Molly Bloom's Dairy 39. Pingback: monopoly, the fast way | Saskia 40. Pingback: skimtheblog | skim it! 41. Pingback: Win At Monopoly In 21 Seconds Flat - OnePegGenius 42. Pingback: links for 2010-06-15 43. Pingback: Don't Run Out of Internet* | nothing edifying 44. Pingback: The shortest game of Monopoly ever on Doobybrain.com 45. Pingback: A Shot of Orange Juice (the Blog) >> Complaints about Monopoly 46. Pingback: Robert Sharp >> Blog Archive >> Linklog for 2nd June to 16th June 47. Pingback: links for 2010-06-16 | inluminent 48. Pingback: Blogbdon >> The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly 49. Pingback: links for 2010-06-16 | raxraxrax.com 50. Pingback: Das kurzeste Monopolyspiel | Kotzendes Einhorn 51. Pingback: The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly << Thoughts 52. Pingback: Shortest Game of Monopoly? | Tosh.0 Blog 53. Pingback: Guy records dirty love song to Sarah Palin | DailyBrainCandy 54. Pingback: Shortest Game of Monopoly? | Trendy Gossip 55. Pingback: VIDEO: The shortest game of Monopoly you could possibly play | Premature Ejackulation 56. Pingback: Shortest Monopoly Game Ever 57. Pingback: June 18, 2010: Links Ahoy << Rails Test Prescriptions Blog 58. Pingback: Speed Monopoly: Bankrupt In 21 Seconds 59. Pingback: Fastest Game of Monopoly 60. Pingback: Monopoly Express -- Guiabreve 61. Pingback: Notes for 6/20/2010 at MasterMaq's Blog 62. Pingback: Monday Medley << No Pun Intended 63. Pingback: For the Record << Short Cuts Blog 64. Pingback: shortest-possible-game-of-monopoly-21-seconds/ << Butitsmyonlyline's Blog 65. Pingback: The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly (VIDEO): 21 Seconds | E Pluribus Unum 66. Pingback: Indignant Desert Birds >> Sunday Afternoon Reading Material: Second Sunday in January 2011 67. Pingback: The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly (And How J Took All Joy Out of the Game) | Geek in Heels 68. Pingback: monopoly 69. [64ba] snyxiuswebdesign says: August 18, 2011 at 11:11 pm great game that is simply amazing.... http://www.snyxius.com LikeLike Reply 70. Pingback: University of Queensland's Paul Greenfield fails to explain involvement in ... 71. Pingback: University's Mr 21 Seconds | AA Degree 72. [036e] abderrezak31 says: April 14, 2012 at 8:32 am great post man LikeLike Reply 73. Pingback: Head Tale - The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly 74. [b0aa] krusta80 says: September 25, 2012 at 12:34 am Hey guys! Monopoly nerd here...just wanted to mention that I'm thinking of developing a series of blog posts on Monopoly statistics and strategy (and maybe even eventually a book). To help generate these numbers and probabilities, I am also working on a Monopoly simulator. Hopefully it will eventually be able to help solve some of the more interesting problems we have come up with. :) Check out my most recent post. It's just the tip of the ice burg, but it's a start. http://monopolynerd.wordpress.com LikeLike Reply 75. Pingback: Blue Note Tech Blog >> Game on! | Win at Monopoly in Only 4 Turns... 76. Pingback: The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly is 4 Turns Long | Greg Carlisle 77. Pingback: Die kurzeste Monopoly-Runde | Dressed Like Machines 78. Pingback: Video: The Shortest Game Of Monopoly Ever << 100.3 Jack FM - Dallas, TX 79. Pingback: Win A Game Of Monopoly In 21 Seconds | Gizmodo Australia 80. Pingback: FB: The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds | Rob Williams - Strategist and Deaf Advocate 81. Pingback: La partida mas corta de Monopoly: 4 turnos, 21 segundos >> No Puedo Creer 82. Pingback: La partida mas corta de Monopoly: 4 turnos, 21 segundos | Aiello Corporation VE Servicios Blog! 83. Pingback: Monopoly, short and cruel | Matthew Dicks 84. Pingback: How To Win Monopoly In Only 4 Turns 85. [a010] datagenetics says: April 12, 2013 at 2:57 pm Here's how to calculate the shortest game of Chutes and ladders http://www.datagenetics.com/blog/november12011/index.html Here's Candyland http://www.datagenetics.com/blog/december12011/ index.html Battleship http://www.datagenetics.com/blog/december32011/ index.html Hangman http://www.datagenetics.com/blog/april12012/index.html LikeLike Reply 86. [fb00] hales16 says: June 27, 2016 at 7:32 pm My brother and I were just discussing this, we googled "shortest possible monopoly game" and found this. I think I can do four rounds/eight rolls. Player 1: 1-1: Community Chest. Bank Error in your favor +$200 ($1700) 5-3: Just visiting. Player 2: 6-4: Just visiting. Player 3: 3-3: Buys St James Place -$180 ($1520) 1-1: Buys Tennessee -$180 ($1340) 1-3: Chance. Go back 3 spaces Buys New York -$200 ($1140) Buys 11 houses (4 on St. James, 3 on Tennessee, 4 on New York) Player 2: 3-3: St James. Pays $750. 1-2: New York. Pays $800. LikeLike Reply 87. Pingback: Strongmen and Monopoly - JasonSandwich.com 88. Pingback: Cas tipic 2716: noi li agrada noia, noi ja esta avorrit del pedra, paper, tisores | Pons's blog 89. [phot] Peter Sutton says: December 22, 2017 at 7:20 pm Shorter Game (2 rounds, 5 rolls): Round 1: Player 1 lands on Baltic. Refuses to buy. It goes to auction. Player 2 buys it for ALL his/her money. Player 2 lands on Baltic. Round 2: Player 1 rolls snake-eyes, lands on Reading Railroad, buys it. Player 1 rolls again (because of the doubles), lands on Pennsylvania Railroad, buys it. Player 2 lands on Reading, but has no money, and the mortgage value of Baltic is less than the $50 he/she owes. Game over, player 1 wins. Player two played very stupidly, of course, but the rules were followed, and nobody quit. LikeLike Reply 90. Pingback: About Monopoly Board Game and Lessons for children, Money,Economics, Geography - Learn Talk Money 91. [16e4] hotmail123 says: June 16, 2018 at 4:21 am Your article is easy to understand, simple communication is accessible to most people. I will keep track of your posts regularly hotmail login LikeLike Reply 92. Pingback: Pochemu "Monopoliia" - na samom dele ochen' plokhaia igra | INFOS.BY 93. Pingback: Pochemu "Monopoliia" -- na samom dele ochen' plokhaia igra | | 24 chasa 94. Pingback: Pochemu <> - na samom dele ochen' plokhaia igra | INFOS.BY 95. Pingback: How to win Monopoly in the shortest possible time - honynews.com 96. Pingback: Server Bug Fix: Shortest game of Monopoly - TECHPRPR 97. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds - Welcome to world wide tech news Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here... [ ] Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: * * * * Gravatar Email (required) (Address never made public) [ ] Name (required) [ ] Website [ ] WordPress.com Logo You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change ) Google photo You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change ) Twitter picture You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change ) Facebook photo You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change ) Cancel Connecting to %s [ ] Notify me of new comments via email. [ ] Notify me of new posts via email. [Post Comment] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Post navigation Previous Previous post: ask a scatterbrain: indexing Next Next post: name that foucault latest posts * one year later: policing, violence, and public safety in minneapolis * say their names: ida b. wells and the humanizing of data * what about du bois? a response to prasad's critique of emancipatory sociology * lovecraft and american history behind the veil * automated petition signatures with google forms * bringing communities together with the #DuBoisChallenge latest comments * New top story on Hacker News: The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds - Welcome to world wide tech news on The Shortest Possible Game of Monopoly: 21 Seconds * One Year Later: Policing, Violence, and Public Safety in Minneapolis - Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies on dismantling the minneapolis police department * One Year Later: Policing, Violence, and Public Safety in Minneapolis - Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies on one year later: policing, violence, and public safety in minneapolis * discoursechick on guest post: artificial intelligence discovers gayface. sigh. * Gay History: Debunking The 'Gaydar' Myth | timalderman on guest post: artificial intelligence discovers gayface. sigh. * Should you go to grad school? - DANIEL LAURISON on guest post: should you go to grad school? * Should you email professors before applying to grad school? - DANIEL LAURISON on ask a guest scatterbrain: should i write to professors in the grad programs i'm applying to? * Auto-petitions | News from JURN on automated petition signatures with google forms contributors * Mike Bader, American * Nicole Bedera, Michigan * Jess Calarco, Indiana * Neal Caren, North Carolina * Jessica Collett, UCLA * Nadirah Farah Foley, Harvard * Tina Fetner, McMaster * Jeremy Freese, Stanford * Dan Hirschman, Brown * Shamus Khan, Columbia * Jeff Lockhart, Michigan * Dan Myers, Notre Dame * Andrew Perrin, North Carolina * Michelle Phelps, Minnesota * olderwoman (Pam Oliver), Wisconsin * and other guest and mystery correspondents) Blogroll * andrew gelman et al * bad hessian * black, white, and gray * chris uggen * code and culture * conditionally accepted * contexts crawler * cranky sociologists * crooked timber * data colada * everyday sociology * family inequality * get a life, phd * grateful dating * immanent frame * jay livingston * kieran healy * lane kenworthy * legally sociable * orgtheory * peter levin * politics outdoors * savage minds * scatterplot * sociological images * tristan bridges * work in progress Archives * May 2021 * March 2021 * February 2021 * January 2021 * December 2020 * November 2020 * October 2020 * September 2020 * August 2020 * July 2020 * June 2020 * May 2020 * April 2020 * March 2020 * February 2020 * January 2020 * December 2019 * November 2019 * October 2019 * September 2019 * August 2019 * July 2019 * June 2019 * May 2019 * April 2019 * March 2019 * February 2019 * January 2019 * December 2018 * November 2018 * October 2018 * September 2018 * August 2018 * July 2018 * June 2018 * May 2018 * April 2018 * March 2018 * February 2018 * January 2018 * December 2017 * November 2017 * October 2017 * September 2017 * August 2017 * July 2017 * June 2017 * May 2017 * April 2017 * March 2017 * February 2017 * January 2017 * December 2016 * November 2016 * October 2016 * September 2016 * August 2016 * July 2016 * June 2016 * May 2016 * April 2016 * March 2016 * February 2016 * January 2016 * December 2015 * November 2015 * October 2015 * September 2015 * August 2015 * July 2015 * June 2015 * May 2015 * April 2015 * March 2015 * February 2015 * January 2015 * December 2014 * November 2014 * October 2014 * September 2014 * August 2014 * July 2014 * June 2014 * May 2014 * April 2014 * March 2014 * February 2014 * January 2014 * December 2013 * November 2013 * October 2013 * September 2013 * August 2013 * July 2013 * June 2013 * May 2013 * April 2013 * March 2013 * February 2013 * January 2013 * December 2012 * November 2012 * October 2012 * September 2012 * August 2012 * July 2012 * June 2012 * May 2012 * April 2012 * March 2012 * February 2012 * January 2012 * December 2011 * November 2011 * October 2011 * September 2011 * August 2011 * July 2011 * June 2011 * May 2011 * April 2011 * March 2011 * February 2011 * January 2011 * December 2010 * November 2010 * October 2010 * September 2010 * August 2010 * July 2010 * June 2010 * May 2010 * April 2010 * March 2010 * February 2010 * January 2010 * December 2009 * November 2009 * October 2009 * September 2009 * August 2009 * July 2009 * June 2009 * May 2009 * April 2009 * March 2009 * February 2009 * January 2009 * December 2008 * November 2008 * October 2008 * September 2008 * August 2008 * July 2008 * June 2008 * May 2008 * April 2008 * March 2008 * February 2008 * January 2008 * December 2007 * November 2007 disclaimer This blog is not hosted on any university computer and all conceivable disclaimers about the separation of professional employment from personal blogging apply. front - [k14] rss feed Search Scatterplot Search for: [ ] Search scatterplot Blog at WordPress.com. %d bloggers like this: [b]