Go to previous page Go up Go to next page

4.8 Spacecraft unmodeled motion

Unmodeled motion of the spacecraft enters directly into the two-way Doppler time series (see Figure 7View Image). The lack of a time-domain signature makes it difficult to isolate spacecraft motion using the Doppler data only. Such unmodeled motion can arise in principle from a variety of causes: fluctuations in the solar wind hitting the spacecraft, fluctuations in solar radiation pressure, physical articulation of spacecraft parts, leaking thrusters, sloshing of fuel in the spacecraft’s tanks, etc. Solar wind and solar radiation pressure fluctuations are computed to be far too small to affect observations at current levels of sensitivity [93Jump To The Next Citation Point]. Articulation of instruments is restricted during quiet spacecraft periods where good Doppler sensitivity is required. Leaking thrusters and fuel sloshing are also thought to be small effects at current generation Doppler sensitivity [93].

In one case the as-flown spacecraft motion noise was independently determined. Using telemetry from Cassini’s reaction wheel assembly, Won, Hanover, Belenky, and Lee [122Jump To The Next Citation Point] inferred the time series of antenna phase center motion projected onto the earth-spacecraft line (i.e. the sensitive axis for the Doppler system). This test was done when Cassini was in semi-quiet cruise (thrusters off but with physical articulation of elements of one science instrument, the Cassini Plasma Spectrometer, at ≃ 0.0025 Hz) for 40 hours during 2001 DOY 152-153. The resulting Allan deviation for unmodeled spacecraft motion at τ = 1000 s was computed to be 2.3 × 10–16. Figure 13View Image shows the spectrum of velocity noise observed in that test. Unmodeled motion of the spacecraft – at least the Cassini spacecraft – is thus negligible compared with other noises at the sensitivity of current-generation Doppler experiments (see Figure 10View Image and Table 2).

View Image

Figure 13: Spectrum of Cassini radial velocity fluctuations, observed in a 40 hour cruise test during 2001 DOY 152-153 [122Jump To The Next Citation Point], reproduced here with permission. The Allan deviation associated with this spacecraft buffeting noise [49Jump To The Next Citation Point, 43] is 2.3 × 10–16 at an integration time of 1000 s.

  Go to previous page Go up Go to next page