Go to previous page Go up Go to next page

5.1 Noise spectrum estimation

Spacecraft Doppler tracking shares attributes with all other real observations: The noise is non-stationary, there are low-level systematic effects, and there are data gaps. The noise can usually be regarded as effectively statistically stationary for at most the interval of a tracking pass (≃ 8 hours). The non-stationarity of (what may be fundamentally Gaussian but with time-variable variance) noise is a complication. For example in matched filtering for bursts, discussed below, the noise spectrum has to be estimated locally [60Jump To The Next Citation Point] for use in deriving locally-valid matching functions from the assumed GW waveforms [58Jump To The Next Citation Point].

Noise characterization has historically been done via standard spectral and acf analysis techniques [67Jump To The Next Citation Point]. Spectra of various data sets have been presented in [4Jump To The Next Citation Point18Jump To The Next Citation Point25Jump To The Next Citation Point9Jump To The Next Citation Point19Jump To The Next Citation Point]. The data have typically been analyzed with varying time-frequency resolution to assess the fidelity of the spectral estimates and to provide local (in Fourier frequency) estimates of the underlying noise spectral density for sinusoidal and chirp signal searches (below). Running estimates of the variance and third central moments have been used as guides for identifying intervals of stationarity in pilot studies. Bispectra7 were computed for early data sets looking for non-linear, non-Gaussian effects. Bispectral analysis seemed to have limited utility, however; the Doppler noise is close to Gaussian and the slow convergence of higher statistical moments makes the bispectrum hard to estimate accurately over the length of a stationary data interval.


  Go to previous page Go up Go to next page