 |
Figure 1:
Left panel: A typical gravitational collapse. The portion of the event horizon at
late times is isolated. Physically, one would expect the first law to apply to even though
the entire space-time is not stationary because of the presence of gravitational radiation in the
exterior region. Right panel: Space-time diagram of a black hole which is initially in equilibrium,
absorbs a finite amount of radiation, and again settles down to equilibrium. Portions
and of the horizon are isolated. One would expect the first law to hold on both portions
although the space-time is not stationary. |
 |
Figure 2:
A spherical star of mass undergoes collapse. Much later, a spherical shell of
mass falls into the resulting black hole. While and are both isolated horizons,
only is part of the event horizon. |
 |
Figure 3:
Set-up of the general characteristic initial value formulation. The Weyl tensor component
on the null surface is part of the free data which vanishes if is an IH. |
 |
Figure 4:
Penrose diagrams of Schwarzschild–Vaidya metrics for which the mass function
vanishes for [138]. The space-time metric is flat in the past of (i.e., in the shaded
region). In the left panel, as tends to infinity, vanishes and tends to a constant value
. The space-like dynamical horizon , the null event horizon , and the time-like surface
(represented by the dashed line) all meet tangentially at . In the right panel, for
we have . Space-time in the future of is isometric with a portion of the
Schwarzschild space-time. The dynamical horizon and the event horizon meet tangentially
at . In both figures, the event horizon originates in the shaded flat region, while the dynamical
horizon exists only in the curved region. |
 |
Figure 5:
is a dynamical horizon, foliated by marginally trapped surfaces . is the unit
time-like normal to and the unit space-like normal within to the foliations. Although
is space-like, motions along can be regarded as ‘time evolution with respect to observers at
infinity’. In this respect, one can think of as a hyperboloid in Minkowski space and as the
intersection of the hyperboloid with space-like planes. In the figure, joins on to a weakly isolated
horizon with null normal at a cross-section . |
 |
Figure 6:
The region of space-time under consideration has an internal boundary and is
bounded by two Cauchy surfaces and and the time-like cylinder at infinity.
is a Cauchy surface in whose intersection with is a spherical cross-section and the
intersection with is , the sphere at infinity. |
 |
Figure 7:
The world tube of apparent horizons and a Cauchy surface intersect in a 2-sphere
. is the unit time-like normal to and is the unit space-like normal to within
. |
 |
Figure 8:
Bondi-like coordinates in a neighborhood of . |
 |
Figure 9:
The ADM mass as a function of the horizon radius of static spherically symmetric
solutions to the Einstein–Yang–Mills system (in units provided by the Yang–Mills coupling constant).
Numerical plots for the colorless ( ) and families of colored black holes ( ) are shown.
(Note that the -axis begins at rather than at .) |
 |
Figure 10:
An initially static colored black hole with horizon is slightly perturbed and decays
to a Schwarzschild-like isolated horizon , with radiation going out to future null infinity . |
 |
Figure 11:
The ADM mass as a function of the horizon radius in theories with a built-in
non-gravitational length scale. The schematic plot shows crossing of families labelled by and
at . |
 |
Figure 12:
Quantum horizon. Polymer excitations in the bulk puncture the horizon, endowing it
with quantized area. Intrinsically, the horizon is flat except at punctures where it acquires a quantized
deficit angle. These angles add up to endow the horizon with a 2-sphere topology. |