The kernel is a function of
(and of the SPH smoothing length
), i.e., its gradient is
given by
Various types of spherically symmetric kernels have been suggested over the years [198, 20]. Among
those the spline kernel of Monaghan and Lattanzio [201], mostly used in current SPH codes, yields the best
results. It reproduces constant densities exactly in 1D, if the particles are placed on a regular grid of spacing
, and it has compact support.
In the Newtonian case
is given by [200
]
Using the first law of thermodynamics and applying the SPH formalism, one can derive the thermal
energy equation in terms of the specific internal energy
(see, e.g., [199]). However, when
deriving dissipative terms for SPH guided by the terms arising from Riemann solutions, there are
advantages to use an equation for the total specific energy
, which reads [200
]
In SPH calculations the density is usually obtained by summing up the individual particle masses, but a continuity equation may be solved instead, which is given by
The capabilities and limits of SPH have been explored, e.g., in [269
, 16, 167, 275]. Steinmetz and
Müller [269] conclude that it is possible to handle even difficult hydrodynamic test problems involving
interacting strong shocks with SPH, provided a sufficiently large number of particles is used in the
simulations. SPH and finite volume methods are complementary methods to solve the hydrodynamic
equations each having its own merits and defects.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2003-7 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |