The second approach is of statistical nature: find out how many (what fraction of) quasars are multiply
imaged by gravitationally lensing, determine their separation and redshift distributions [182] and deduce
the value of (or limits to)
– matter in clumps of, say,
– and to
– the
value of the cosmological constant.
The first approach has already been treated in Section 4.1. Here we will concentrate on the statistical approach. In order to determine which fraction of a certain group of objects is affected by strong lensing (i.e. multiply imaged), one first needs a well-defined underlying sample. What needs to be done is the following:
Since quasars are rare objects and lensing is a relatively rare phenomenon, steps 1 and 2 are quite
difficult and time-consuming. Nevertheless, a number of systematic quasar surveys with the goal to find
(many) lens systems with well defined selection criteria have been done in the past and others are underway
right now (e.g. [34
, 116, 118, 201, 209]).
The largest survey so far, the CLASS survey, has looked at about 7000 radio sources at the moment (the
goal is 10,000). In total CLASS found 12 new lens systems so far. Interestingly, all the lenses
have small separations (
), and all lensing galaxies are detected [34, 82]. That
leaves little space for a population of dark objects with masses of galaxies or beyond. A detailed
discussion of lens surveys and a comparison between optical and radio surveys can be found
in [101].
The idea for the determination of the cosmological constant
from lens statistics is
based on the fact that the relative lens probability for multiple imaging increases rapidly with increasing
(cf. Figure 9 of [36
]). This was first pointed out 1990 [63, 181]. The reason is the fact that the
angular diameter distances
,
,
depend strongly on the cosmological model. And the
properties that determine the probability for multiple lensing (i.e. the “fractional volume” that is affected
by a certain lens) depend on these distances [36]. This can be seen, e.g. when one looks at the critical
surface mass density required for multiple imaging (cf. Equation (16
)) which depends on the angular
diameter distances.
The consequences of lensing studies on the cosmological constant can be summarized as follows. The
analyses of the frequency of lensing are based on lens systems found in different optical and radio surveys.
The main problem is still the small number of lenses. Depending on the exact selection criteria, only a few
lens systems can be included in the analyses. Nevertheless, one can use the existing samples to put limits on
the cosmological constant. Two different studies found 95%-confidence limits of
[102] and
[117, 154]. This is based on the assumption of a flat universe (
).
Investigations on the matter content of the universe from (both “macro-” and “micro-”) lensing generally
conclude that the fractional matter in compact form cannot exceed a few percent of the critical density
(e.g. [35, 45, 129, 165]).
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-12 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |