Posts by objectObject@hachyderm.io
 (DIR) Post #ASwZEIn11VHKcN25qq by objectObject@hachyderm.io
       2023-02-22T16:49:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Mer__edith tbf, AI serving the interests of amoral mega-corporations is at least *a* common scifi premise.
       
 (DIR) Post #ATIFCgCvmAkc9wHLkG by objectObject@hachyderm.io
       2023-03-05T03:47:44Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59 sounds like you're in the pocket of Big Open.
       
 (DIR) Post #AWgNBVtTvmyX0q4HtA by objectObject@hachyderm.io
       2023-06-14T12:47:36Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @falktx @monsieuricon didn't they already limit free tier CI a lot when people were mining crypto on it?
       
 (DIR) Post #AY3US06rbHrgsWa7uq by objectObject@hachyderm.io
       2023-07-25T14:17:22Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @simon I was hoping it was a tool to show diffs between versions of a single package. I often do that by looking at tags on the git repo, but those aren't always accurate or complete.
       
 (DIR) Post #AYi9KIikZTOGxyiXxo by objectObject@hachyderm.io
       2023-08-14T05:05:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @brewsterkahle @mvexel 100 years ago musicians were thinking to themselves "Why should I bother? In 100 years people are just going to be giving this music away for free. I mean not because the copyright is expired, as current laws would indicate, but because the copyright term will be posthumously extended. But no, the rights holders then will protect my rights, and I will be justly compensated today. I guess I should make this recording."
       
 (DIR) Post #AZ2D7tMW1DJMxfyFQe by objectObject@hachyderm.io
       2023-08-23T21:20:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @simon what is Jarvis?
       
 (DIR) Post #Adc6EIXEmvEaBhWMQC by objectObject@hachyderm.io
       2024-01-07T20:19:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @simon I feel like LLMs are one of the first technologies where "Artificial Intelligence" sort of applies. GPT4 can do things I cannot do, do tasks which it wasn't explicitly trained on, etc. It's not very good at a lot of this and has obvious limitations. But it seems much harder to explain it away as "just" doing XYZ, as with earlier AI technologies like symbolic calculus, expert systems or statistical classifiers.