Posts by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
 (DIR) Post #AR3uDntbaoWprzzMJ6 by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
       2022-12-28T10:03:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @FroehlichMarcel Sociology is the study of methods.Methodology is the study of methods."I will study English society" is different to "I will study English sociology".When people write methodology, they mean method.
       
 (DIR) Post #AR3uazmZZ5KzObl2zQ by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
       2022-12-28T10:07:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @FroehlichMarcel Yes. Everyone gets it wrong.
       
 (DIR) Post #AR6cXiiHM8abt3uy12 by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
       2022-12-29T17:29:37Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @FroehlichMarcel lols!!Thankyou :-)I will fix it now.For those who read this later, I originally wrote "Sociology is the study of methods" =-)
       
 (DIR) Post #AR8fXa1eLTk3TywpsG by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
       2022-12-30T17:11:51Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @clive I recall reading though poor legislation was central to the 1930s dust bowl in USA/Canada.  I may be wrong, but I suspect as with it all things it's much easier to get it wrong, than right.
       
 (DIR) Post #AR8hCzPOyb2s2AMpSy by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
       2022-12-30T17:30:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @clive Neighbourhood costs are I think always wrong, from an ethical point of view.The question is whether legislature can  deal with this, or the wide range of other ecological issues?  and can it, upon recognizing an issue, produce legislation which actually has the intended effect?Overall, are we better off with legislation, or worse off?  more to the point, how can we even tell, given how complex the world is?We need a mechanism which works overall and can be *proved* to be working.
       
 (DIR) Post #AS15mM28GhaikRxggK by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
       2023-01-25T22:54:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @apps I do not understand the question, I'm afraid.
       
 (DIR) Post #ASd20QlRaXZWo1pxM8 by maxganz@data-folks.masto.host
       2023-02-13T06:37:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @johnquiggin The planet needs about four billion less people, to be ecologically sustainable. The idea of *wanting* to increase population is crazy.