Posts by locusinbloom@pleroma.lokean.org
 (DIR) Post #A0Zlomnj0Vq2RxtjDE by locusinbloom@pleroma.lokean.org
       2020-10-27T04:27:52.371056Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @comrade_lecter @ComradeDeath What would be a better criteria they should use to target their demographic?
       
 (DIR) Post #A1ddauHavBSglu9mtM by locusinbloom@pleroma.lokean.org
       2020-11-27T22:34:20.543001Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Oh, well, and if the human rights abuses don’t turn you off buying at Amazon, here’s another glimpse of our dystopian future under their ruleI’m laughing my ass off, I really am.
       
 (DIR) Post #A3BeSycB6JoZ96S2aW by locusinbloom@pleroma.lokean.org
       2021-01-12T23:11:03.878042Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @klaatu @kev I do use "google it" all the time, on purpose. At least under US law, if enough people use the word "google" to mean "a search on the internet using any search engine" and if Google is unable to stop that from happening, then Google will lose their trademark.I sometimes say "google it on duckduckgo".
       
 (DIR) Post #AFoGJNftibTByIgrZY by locusinbloom@pleroma.lokean.org
       2022-01-25T17:06:02.891544Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Ripley @mushroomfemboy @hungerarcana @nate_river Hm, yes, but you haven't answered the question.If you see a situation that upsets you, but you cannot clearly articulate the harmful outcome, then it is likely that your own sense of safety/control feels violated. Try saying "I believe this use of pictures is disrespectful and wrong, but I know that I do not have the right to control other people's harmless actions."
       
 (DIR) Post #AFoGJOfa1GoH3bY7iS by locusinbloom@pleroma.lokean.org
       2022-01-25T19:44:00.711826Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Ripley @hungerarcana @nate_river @mushroomfemboy I'm not attacking you. I am prodding you to examine your beliefs and find the root of what you think is true.From what you've written, I take it that you believe using photos in this way a) violates boundaries, b) is contact, c) invades privacy.The foundation of consent is that I must have your informed permission before I do anything which materially impacts or potentially harms you.To better understand your own feelings, I think you should try to articulate what the harm is from using the photos. What difference does it make to the victim? What have they lost or stand to lose from the use (which they have not already lost merely by the photos being shared)?My position is that they have already (potentially) suffered psychological harm from having their photos shared without their consent; further use of the photos (private, without sharing, without contact or informing the victim) does not further harm them. You do not have to share my position, but you should (for your own growth as a person) be able to clearly articulate your own.