Posts by bn4t@toot.cafe
 (DIR) Post #9gnb2o0v4Yjcijtuts by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-03-15T15:16:27Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @infosechandbookThank you for this insightful article👍
       
 (DIR) Post #9i7ta6ed0pjutJ8WC8 by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-04-24T08:10:36Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @infosechandbookCrazy that so many sites still allow 6-character passwords🤦🏼‍♂️
       
 (DIR) Post #9iMftaMqdXCGamTBLc by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-01T11:17:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @infosechandbookYes, I host both Nextcloud and Matrix on a rented server.
       
 (DIR) Post #9j1lp55UrTu15I3iRU by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-21T07:07:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaiyouWhat stops your friends from using f-droid?
       
 (DIR) Post #9j2aI8KAtydvEFyGuW by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-21T16:33:03Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaiyouOk, thanks for elaborating👍
       
 (DIR) Post #9jE5KGuEhdWlu7O2Ii by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-27T05:29:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DashEquals Really don't get why people try to prevent archiving *public* content. All public content from the fediverse is archiveable. Barriers like javascript won't help prevent it. If something publicly federates, anyone can download it, which means anyone can archive it.
       
 (DIR) Post #9jE6yzWMLRmDoQCOp6 by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-27T06:01:12Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaiyou1/?The whole making archived content public is another discussion in my opinion, because of copyright and the sorts.However in my opinion your analogy is not quite fitting: on the internet you can choose what to make public. Say, if something embarassing happens you can choose not to make it public.Also on the internet you can choose if you want to show a profile picture with your face on it, use your real name or a nickname, ... The list goes on.
       
 (DIR) Post #9jEAZejosUEVvrfZuy by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-27T06:41:27Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaiyou 1/2You have some good points. I agree that privacy laws (like the right to be forgotten) should stand above archiving efforts. On processing without consent I have to admit that I'm not informed enough to really have an opinion on it. But I feel like it's morally problematic to do it without consent.
       
 (DIR) Post #9jEDd838ecY3ZW3NQG by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-27T06:41:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaiyou 2/2I feel like when it comes to archiving public content without consent, it depends on what that data is going to be used for. I don't think it should be illegal to archive public content (w/o consent) just to preserve it (for like museums or historians in the future).But maybe we just have to agree to disagree on that one.
       
 (DIR) Post #9jEDd8FBvoBoAth0D2 by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-05-27T06:55:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaiyouEither way, thank you for this constructive discussion✌️
       
 (DIR) Post #9jOkhcBBoWgEFDAJEm by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-06-01T07:27:03Z
       
       3 likes, 27 repeats
       
       What do you use as your daily driver?(Boosts appreciated)[ ] Linux[ ] OS X[ ] Windows[ ] Other (*bsd, unix, ...)
       
 (DIR) Post #9jxcnzmyRwUI6yqjtQ by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-06-18T04:59:02Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sirJust making sure: With ubuntu on kernel version 4.15.0-52-generic im safe, right?Or do I still need to disable tcp_sack?
       
 (DIR) Post #9jyTzniyQUDbjvUcNM by bn4t@toot.cafe
       2019-06-18T14:55:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sirThanks!