Posts by andre_601@swiss.social
 (DIR) Post #An2btUGpL6CEy1p2Ia by andre_601@swiss.social
       2024-10-15T20:07:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @internetarchive 1.5k requests per second is normal? Wow... Didn't think of such high values.
       
 (DIR) Post #An6WP4Ba2CUYF0smki by andre_601@swiss.social
       2024-10-17T16:02:50Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Codeberg Pages service seems down again... This happens a lot lately...
       
 (DIR) Post #Aqg3Ep2f4vMsuAR5F2 by andre_601@swiss.social
       2025-02-01T13:03:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Codeberg Something that just came to mind.... What would be @forgejo's mascot?Like GitHub has their Octocat, GitLab has this fox icon, but what would be forgejo's? Would it also be a fox, given their site uses an image of a fox blacksmith?And what would be codeberg's? That polar bair they use (knut)?It's these kinds of questions that live rent-free in my head...
       
 (DIR) Post #B0Vc0JYI26OYCGaAb2 by andre_601@swiss.social
       2025-11-22T13:56:40Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Codeberg I just now was made aware of the ToS changes thanks to the blog post, and I must say that I'm opossed to §2 (1) 1.The way it is written makes it seem like that we need to allow people to commercially use the content, even if we don't want that (And that licenses prohibiting that may not be acceptable by these terms).Of course I may misunderstand this now, but this just shows how vague the writing is, to allow such misunderstanding in the first place.
       
 (DIR) Post #B0Vc0LmtilGh89Qrdw by andre_601@swiss.social
       2025-11-22T14:04:52Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Gusted Well, there still is the issue that the wording, at least for me, makes it sound like as if you have to allow people to use your work for commercial stuff, even if you don't want this.That's my primary issue with this.