Posts by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
(DIR) Post #9muKuVoxflgxJss27s by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-09-14T08:31:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“I will no longer tolerate excuses about anonymity and refusing to speak out in defense of women's sex-based rights (UNDER ONE'S OWN NAME!).”So. A purity test. Not interested Meghan, even if you are a grandee by birth.@meghanmurphy
(DIR) Post #9muL0b7mrnl1VRZtJI by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-09-14T08:32:19Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“I will no longer tolerate excuses about anonymity and refusing to speak out in defense of women's sex-based rights (UNDER ONE'S OWN NAME!).”So. A purity test. Not interested Meghan, even if you are a grandee by birth. You don’t get to tell us plebs what to do.@meghanmurphy
(DIR) Post #9muL9p6qF0sDU9XDFY by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-09-14T08:34:15Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“I will no longer tolerate excuses about anonymity and refusing to speak out in defense of women's sex-based rights (UNDER ONE'S OWN NAME!).”So. A purity test. Not interested Meghan, even if you are a grandee by birth. You don’t get to tell us plebs what to do. That’s what got us here in the first place, remember?@meghanmurphy
(DIR) Post #9muME4FhyvH1YyGmlU by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-09-14T08:46:13Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
If you had just posted this, maybe the jarring “making it all about me” section would have been skimmed over and forgiven.It’s just the earlier post in addition: “I will no longer tolerate excuses about anonymity and refusing to speak out in defense of women's sex-based rights (UNDER ONE'S OWN NAME!).” which makes it rather too obvious what’s going on.What. Were. You. Thinking?@meghanmurphy
(DIR) Post #9muZIGnuYVbl3ObO1g by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-09-14T11:12:39Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
You sound sensible @Lemondrizzle
(DIR) Post #9myGcyUKj9TNphRYiO by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-09-15T07:21:10Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Eh? Not MM then, who was banned from Twitter.Is someone else having a go?@WaltinaNeff @oculusmundi
(DIR) Post #9n3OsiriLq27R7CRCy by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-09-18T17:28:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Good call@LangCleg
(DIR) Post #9nf2S4EHnYff0YsFAe by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-10-06T21:16:02Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
Billingham would be an obvious guess@Debbie_TriptychTwins
(DIR) Post #9nf6vlv8plzWjEL4mu by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-10-06T22:06:15Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@Sherri_Ingrey https://kiwifarms.net/threads/mac-harrison-kilgoresprout.19251/page-3#post-3859966Enjoy...
(DIR) Post #9nhGD1aQlUMnfjKV0q by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-08-25T11:17:52Z
0 likes, 2 repeats
Find an outrageous Jackie Tran tweetGo through the tweet report options one by oneTry to nail a Jackie tweet under those headingsFail miserablyFail repeatedly And that, my friend, is your answer. Must drive the TRA’s potty 😹Weaponry reverse engineering by an Emeritus Professor of Weaponry Reverse Engineering@JackieMac@SouerTeresa
(DIR) Post #9oXJarnZ1xHu9rI87E by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2019-11-02T01:42:31Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
20 months is a great age, the word volcano starts overflowing then. Write down all her words and you soon won’t be able to keep up, it’s unbelievable @Ruth_H
(DIR) Post #9sxbrBa7jIT36e9be4 by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2020-03-13T09:38:05Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
1) complaints ruin their key performance indicators, so carry on2) ensure you get names and dates... “who agreed to this, and when?”. And make it clear this is for future reference. Nothing makes people think about things more than having to defend a stupid whim at some future point@Camille
(DIR) Post #9ujNXqPSe5RiFH1o2K by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2020-05-05T08:33:27Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
https://uncommongroundmedia.com/sexist-science-transsexualism-part-i-benjamin-ihlenfeld-money-ehrhardt/“ Sexist History at the Heart of the ‘Science’ on Transsexualism, Part I: Benjamin, Ihlenfeld, Money & Ehrhardt”https://uncommongroundmedia.com/robert-stoller-true-trans/“ Sexist History at the Heart of the ‘Science’ on Transsexualism, Part II: Robert Stoller, True Trans”ICYMI latest from Dr Em ⬆️ I’m sure part lll is in the works. Currently being discussed on MN:https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3896788-Important-series-of-articles-by-Dr-Em-Sexist-History-at-the-Heart-of-the-Science-on-Transsexualism-Part-I-Benjamin-Ihlenfeld-Money-Ehrhardt
(DIR) Post #9xhlFUcsfEXHQ7FI12 by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2020-08-02T07:28:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
No way is that a year! Where did it go?Happy birthday.@mk @spinster
(DIR) Post #9yhurQCTiaXrGtbhQ0 by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2020-08-31T19:41:11.963901Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@DejaVu @MandyJane I don’t accept the rhetoric of “White Supremacist Barbie”.It’s abuse. Simple, unacceptable, bullying abuse.
(DIR) Post #A72QsyHE5MySrsB2lk by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2021-05-08T09:36:56.122521Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@You_cat_to_be_kitten_me @LangCleg I like that, bigly. 😹
(DIR) Post #A72UxMxodqoGPMS0dk by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2021-05-08T11:07:28.719028Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@HebrideanHecate @LangCleg @You_cat_to_be_kitten_me Hey you! I’m “tremendously enthused” by Kathleen’s latest popular work of feminism of course. Aren’t we all? 😑
(DIR) Post #A72xyCPIH5BIcw3EnY by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2021-05-08T17:48:51.928907Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@TradeMinister @ghost_ @LangCleg You’ll probably appreciate this one as well ⬇️https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/rich-white-men-institutionalizing-transgender-ideology/
(DIR) Post #A7H6UIMHCc4OCJtVtw by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2021-05-15T13:06:49.630854Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@PosieParker Just got my “The Banned” email. Can you/anyone who sees this please give detail of exactly which “Conservative Party women’s group” is being referred to here? (See pic)The rest are kind of expected, but this one was a bit of a surprise.I would like to find out a bit more about what’s going on there; to say the least, I’m not best pleased.Thank you
(DIR) Post #A7IlWkUTruoXJ3yqvo by StanFastic@spinster.xyz
2021-05-16T08:22:19.810560Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@KeepPrisonsSingleSex Sorry, I’m incredibly slow, it took me the whole weekend to “get” your comment 😹