Posts by Ripley@nnia.space
(DIR) Post #AFkSRLZcpl22DZq02K by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-23T18:39:54Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
My god it’s beautiful.
(DIR) Post #AFkSVRhC0w0WMbKd60 by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-23T18:50:31Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Okay but Femboy isn’t a slur and I wish the new wave LGBT community would stop arguing over misnomers and identifiers and actually work on building a community. But then I don’t know what to expect from people who keep trying to turn LGBT identities mainstream.
(DIR) Post #AFl2mLUBqmZz0q8Mam by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-24T07:06:50Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Rose It’s mostly on Twitter, but yes somehow?
(DIR) Post #AFnhjyVPuKZzKmjXqC by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T13:34:31Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@nate_river @hungerarcana I personally think it’s crossing a line. Unless you know the person is fine with it, it’s morally an issue to use their personal photos for your “pleasure”. It’s about personal boundaries and the fact I’m sure most children would be very uncomfortable if revealed to them an adult is jacking it off to them. Not even going to lie, that’s disgusting behaviour and that fact you’re trying to justify it is pathetic.
(DIR) Post #AFnklxJhbBPE5XtGCW by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:12:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mushroomfemboy @hungerarcana @nate_river We’re talking about children here. First off, their photos were probably shared by their parents, and secondly that’s absolutely disgusting, and just shows how little respect you have for people’s privacy or boundaries. It doesn’t matter if someone never hears about it, but you’ve violated the boundaries of a child, who probably was ambivalent at best to their photos being shared, because you wanted to jack off? You can’t do shit like that and then discuss protecting the interests of children, because you’ve demonstrated that on the most base level, you’re unwilling to respect their privacy or boundaries. Especially since Nate literally admitted that wasn’t what the pictures were there for to begin with.
(DIR) Post #AFnklyHG1l2p4Fkp1s by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:16:57Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@nate_river @mushroomfemboy @hungerarcana “the images are in public” okay and? Did the child themselves post the image and then tell you to use it as a pornography tool? The act itself would be shitty no matter what (think of the amount of women who have said they were uncomfortable finding out people used their personal photos as pornography), but the fact it’s a child who probably didn’t even post the pictures themselves is ridiculous. I honestly cannot believe you’re trying to defend it.
(DIR) Post #AFnklz6IxxsTcZdab2 by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:19:10Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mushroomfemboy @hungerarcana @nate_river It becomes their fault when they start using it as pornography. Like I said, if you wouldn’t look the kid in the eyes and explain that, then it’s a shit thing to do
(DIR) Post #AFnm847d4rPVWHLkuG by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:27:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mushroomfemboy @hungerarcana @nate_river If you cannot understand why using someone’s personal photographs that they didn’t upload online themselves to masturbate to is an inherent crossing of boundaries and consent no matter the situation, that’s on you
(DIR) Post #AFnm853lahumQaYBWa by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:40:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@nate_river @mushroomfemboy @hungerarcana Congratulations on blaming parents for wanting to post an innocent photo of their children online without someone masturbating over it
(DIR) Post #AFnnI8rWPMvZ4TBUki by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:14:28Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Oh no we don’t want to harm children - we just want to use their photos as fucking pornography while they’re unaware and unable to consent, and then try and defend that, even though we’ve admitted the photos weren’t taken with that intent.
(DIR) Post #AFnqkHAhPKdOoSGGoa by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:14:55Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Explain to a child that someone they know/even a stranger is using photos they view as completely innocent as a masturbation tool and then come back to me
(DIR) Post #AFnrFLTlRUHR9JzgvY by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T14:41:20Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“It’s the parents fault I’m masturbating to an innocent photo of their child without anyone’s consent!” Literally do you not understand what you sound like
(DIR) Post #AFoCzV3cGEhdDKc3oe by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T19:28:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tsumi No though, because that’ll come back to haunt them later. Imagine being a child and knowing that potentially every picture someone posts of you is being used for the sexual pleasure of a stranger? That would absolutely fuck up someone’s view of themselves and lead to a slew of paranoia and body image issues, considering you’ve just told the child you’re getting off on them being in an innocent position fully clothed - you’d absolutely worry in every situation that someone somewhere is getting off to it, even if they can’t conceptualise that at the time. Don’t underestimate what children can understand and the effects it can have on them
(DIR) Post #AFoGJOEzc7Xhj96tH6 by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T19:24:38Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@locusinbloom @hungerarcana @nate_river @mushroomfemboy No, don’t imply it’s my issue. It’s harmful because it sets a precedent for violating people’s boundaries, it’s harmful because you can’t claim to be anti contact and then masturbate over images of day to day children, it’s harmful because you’ve physically or virtually taken those pictures and put them into your possession, thus invading the privacy of a minor who probably didn’t even consent to having them on a public platform. I never said I could control his actions, he asked for peoples opinions and I’ve stated it, but in defending his position he’s just proved he doesn’t actually care about the feeling of children so??
(DIR) Post #AFoGJP8IIVmKUez3TM by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T19:51:39Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@locusinbloom @hungerarcana @nate_river @mushroomfemboy “My own growth as a person” masturbating to pictures of children without their consent is harmful because it sets a precedent for boundary breaking behaviour, and even if the child never finds out, you should have enough respect for a group you’re supposedly protecting and supporting to not take advantage of them in any way, including by co-opting materials posted in a specific context for your own sexual pleasure
(DIR) Post #AFoIgF1KGFdrhPk2Yy by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T19:47:33Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tsumi Throwing psychiatric terms at an argument isn’t validating it. Also I don’t take your point. If someone says “I’m masturbating to you fully clothed in random situations without your knowledge” and you really think someone needs preexisting issues to be worried and upset about it, then that’s your problem. And masturbation is negative to children. I don’t give a shit about any argument against that - yes in a hypothetical world where children are educated ect ect that may not be the case, but Nate is doing that to real pictures of real children right now and that’s not acceptable. Just because you might not have an issue with it, doesn’t mean that children socialised from birth to see sexual activity as negative won’t, and to discredit that just shows you literally haven’t been around any actual children for a while
(DIR) Post #AFoIgGSIvQog9NN6Fk by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T20:28:55Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@FallenFadedLostItAll @tsumi Okay. I’m not on a moral high horse, god knows my morality system is skewed. But at least I’m acknowledging that and didn’t make a post about wanking to pictures of real life kids and acting like the authority is the issue there. Your argument holds as little weight as everyone else’s, but I agree with you on certain points about education ect.
(DIR) Post #AFoQCJf9Egzf2ibrP6 by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T21:49:15Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@cummies @FallenFadedLostItAll @tsumi A moral high horse would be me making out Nate is a bad person purely because of it, which I’m not, or using it in a context aside from an argument about it, which I’m not.
(DIR) Post #AFoS0X9rR0HxKbU7eK by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T22:15:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tsumi @cummies @FallenFadedLostItAll literally the narrative I’m pushing is that it’s harmful, that’s it. You can divine whatever meaning you want, but it’s an isolated opinion and trying to turn this argument into something it’s not isn’t going to work
(DIR) Post #AFoSAl0YnNYpBM0eAq by Ripley@nnia.space
2022-01-25T22:30:53Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tsumi @cummies @FallenFadedLostItAll Oh my fucking god Montaigne it’s fine. You are genuinely hilarious though and I do hope you realise that I’m attempting to sound academic you just sound like a 14 year old with a thesaurus and too much free time. My standpoint has very little to do with morals, but with what I view as an inherent lack of respect. However I’ve acknowledged several times that this is a philosophical argument - I’m not expecting people to agree, because each individual will have their own viewpoint on what’s deemed acceptable, but I’m allowed to communicate my anger at making a situation like that public, especially under the facade of a pro morality/pro children’s rights group.I’m capable of making a subjective argument and acknowledging that, but I’m also allowed to communicate my frustration at what I see as hypocritical and self serving behaviour. I don’t think you understand what a logical fallacy is, or how it serves within a sociological argument. I’ve already said I don’t want to work on hypotheticals so as to remove me from subjectivity as far as possible. Maybe substantiate your own point and go and learn some actual argumentative skills rather than making reactionary value judgements based on a small section of a larger argument.