Posts by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
(DIR) Post #AiodwtMjkbx4arY8m0 by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T09:38:19Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom 2) But if you believe that this new state will not have this essential feature and will be the real power of the workers themselves and not a minority that thinks it rules in the name of the workers - then it will not be a state and therefore why call it a state? Bakunin once also called a federation of workers from bottom to top a state, but he realized that this only confuses and gives way to those who want a dictatorship of their party.
(DIR) Post #AiohnFT57Tr840AsMa by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T11:41:27Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom The state will not benefit from teaching people to live without the state, otherwise it will lose its power and its privileges, because having power that the majority does not have is already a privilege. History has shown this when socialist states suppressed workers' self-government. Besides, who will determine that people have learned enough and can do without the state? The state and the party that owns the state? What makes you think it will be any different next time? Are you hoping for a good party with good people? Then how is that different from liberalism with its hope for a good man who can be brought in through elections? Plus, again, you somehow think anarchists think you can build communism overnight. I've already said above what anarchists want to do to prepare. @nestor @Sindy
(DIR) Post #AioiCQhwT4GIA88HkO by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T11:46:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom In a bourgeois republic, too, there are democratic institutions, and also the state may not have much power, but the state does not become more popular. This is precisely because of the very property of the state, which is a priori separated from the people. Socialist states were not very different in this respect, only they were dressed not in the clothes of liberalism, but in red clothes. But the change of names does not change the essence of the state, but for some reason you are convinced that it does.
(DIR) Post #AioiWDLLrkFmVO04O0 by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T11:49:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom H.1.6 Why do anarchists try to "build the new world in the shell of the old"?: https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionH.html#sech16H.2.5 Do anarchists think "full blown" socialism will be created overnight?: https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionH.html#sech25
(DIR) Post #AioizPvQAMZlvOnQtk by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T11:50:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Иногда я очень завидую челам с lor.sh у которых нет ограничения на размер поста
(DIR) Post #AiojBXgX8nUbSzcA64 by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T11:57:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom "every State, even the most Republican and the most democratic . . . . are in essence only machines governing the masses from above" and "[i]f there is a State, there must necessarily be domination, and therefore slavery; a State without slavery, overt or concealed, is unthinkable - and that is why we are enemies of the State." Bakunin
(DIR) Post #AiojIQjTOAYlvlH2Se by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T11:58:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom "For, even from the standpoint of that urban proletariat who are supposed to reap the sole reward of the seizure of political power, surely it is obvious that this power will never be anything but a sham? It is bound to be impossible for a few thousand, let alone tens or hundreds of thousands of men to wield that power effectively. It will have to be exercised by proxy, which means entrusting it to a group of men elected to represent and govern them, which in turn will unfailingly return them to all the deceit and subservience of representative or bourgeois rule. After a brief flash of liberty or orgiastic revolution, the citizens of the new State will wake up slaves, puppets and victims of a new group of ambitious men." Bakunin
(DIR) Post #Aiols2Jlq41wXlMFJA by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T12:27:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom Again, the point is that the state will always be in the hands of a minority, since that is how the state is organized and the people will not have power, because otherwise there would be no state. The question here is not whether it is necessary to defend the revolution or not, whether it is necessary to make order or not, etc., the question here is in whose hands the power is - either it is in the hands of a minority, the state or it is in the hands of the people, that is, a stateless federation of workers. "an essential feature of the state is the public authority, which differs from the masses of the people.... They can also be directed against the people." Engels, The origin of the family, private property and the State
(DIR) Post #AiooIfcSXV39s8vXW4 by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T12:54:22Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom These properties of the state and the privileges associated with them will also corrupt people, so the state cannot be an instrument of transition to communism. The funds must match the goals, otherwise the wrong funds will lead to the wrong goal. You cannot use a tool that has developed certain properties that you recognize, since it received these properties for a reason, but to fulfill a certain goal - to preserve the power of the exploitative minority and its privileges. As for the influence on people, here are the links to the answers, please read (also, if everything was so bad with the influence of capitalism, then the Makhnovshchina and the Spanish revolution would not have taken place in principle): https://mastodon.ml/@EredYasibu/112597832512463669Since we have already repeated ourselves several times, it seems that the discussion has exhausted itself and it is probably better to end already@nestor @Sindy
(DIR) Post #AiooWFRwdMwOlMU21g by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-11T12:33:23Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@rf что-то я не понял, deepl добавил лимит переводов? Хм, слыхал яндекс переводчик обновили, реально ли он стал лучше переводить?
(DIR) Post #AitaA8pXIwBHSHCusS by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-13T18:46:48Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@rf Mozilla восстановила доступ к расширениям для обхода блокировок в России: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6763234
(DIR) Post #AiwraaJW1ce6uyIwtM by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-15T09:45:21Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom Only to those who commit violent acts or support and call for violent acts.
(DIR) Post #AixDk3bagfiPMUgI2i by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-15T14:17:08Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom if the revolution gives real freedom and equality and real power over their affairs to the people, then I think the various counter-revolutionaries will not be able to achieve significant support.
(DIR) Post #Aj1qTy13VvF8YoT0dM by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-17T13:52:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@kent в плане
(DIR) Post #Aj57OqIAs7Z3tEvY00 by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-19T09:43:42Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom Many authoritarian actions were taken BEFORE the Civil War, such as dispersing unwanted soviets, strengthening the power of the party, replacing self-government with one-man rule in factories, abolishing the election of officers in the army, and so on. Lenin and Trotsky themselves quite honestly said later that they established the dictatorship of the party and saw nothing wrong in it. The same Trotsky even after Stalin's victory will talk about the need for a dictatorship of the party. @kingtor
(DIR) Post #Aj5MMXEgFbMfWMePPk by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-19T12:31:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom @kingtor 1) As I have already said, these actions were taken BEFORE, I repeat, BEFORE the civil war, so it is impossible to justify these actions by the war2) I agree that the theoretical dictatorship of the proletariat in the sense of the power of the class itself without the governed and ruled, and therefore not a dictatorship, and the dictatorship of the party are not the same thing. But bolsheviks believed that the dictatorship of the party was the dictatorship of the proletariat.3) See, Lenin promised many libertarian things in State and Revolution. At the same time, he said many times that there would be very difficult conditions for victory, that there was bound to be civil war, and scolded those who wanted to wait for better conditions. It is strange to promise something and then to give it up because of difficult conditions, while you yourself say that these conditions will be there and that it is not worth giving up revolutions because of these difficulties.
(DIR) Post #AjD7SFRIdM4OaDPciu by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-23T06:22:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom Judging from your posts, you somehow think that anarchists believe that when the revolution comes, everything is fine, counter-revolutionaries will not take up arms, etc, even though they don't think that way
(DIR) Post #AjDoaKDd2lQxkh7Eki by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-06-23T14:25:20Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom The state is a centralized hierarchical body of the minority to rule and oppress the majority, the essential feature of which is its distance from the people. The state in this sense is of course not wanted by anarchists. But they are not against defending the revolution and organizing people in general. Another question is how this organization and defense is arranged: a federation of self-governing comunnas and syndicates from the bottom up, with power in the hands of the people themselves, or a supposedly proletarian state with power in the hands of the few in the name of the power of the people.
(DIR) Post #Ajpi68aVFQDHjmtreK by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-07-11T20:58:08Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@mo Девки: о, я хочу отправиться в будущее и встретить Мерлин МонроМужики: угабуга нинада яркий шкврчшкврч
(DIR) Post #Ajsdho9Tl9Ot43Hb6G by EredYasibu@mastodon.ml
2024-07-13T07:03:48Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@rf Хочу уточнить, можно ли после миграции этого акка на условную миску потом, если надо будет, вернутся на этот же акк?