Post B2pcN4nQiFH0WMnApc by Fabian83@chaos.social
 (DIR) More posts by Fabian83@chaos.social
 (DIR) Post #B2olgAnnJP5V4zBRgm by xkcd@mastodon.xyz
       2026-01-30T17:46:54Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       There's also a proof without content of a conjecture without content, but it's left as an exercise for the reader.https://xkcd.com/3201/
       
 (DIR) Post #B2p6FQ5yRTfXjGlsUy by EI3JDB@mastodon.radio
       2026-01-30T21:37:07Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xkcd But it can't - the container required to identify the "proof" is part of the "proof", which therefore fails.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2pcN4nQiFH0WMnApc by Fabian83@chaos.social
       2026-01-31T03:37:18Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xkcd A geometric proof is, technically, a proof without words.