Post B2jnuIRcvGIcxDsT1E by futurile@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by futurile@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #B2jnuIRcvGIcxDsT1E by futurile@mastodon.social
       2026-01-23T14:46:38Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @zimoun The Survey data also showed that we have a lot of contributors. I don't think it tells too much about the review process because the data showed that a lot of people only contributed once or a couple of times. The fact that their reviews took so long were what put them off continuing to contribute.It will be interesting to see if the Codeberg move has made things easier. Annoyed not to be at Guix Days because I think there's more we could do!
       
 (DIR) Post #B2jr4WkOtq8o4WEFLU by cnx@awkward.place
       2026-01-28T08:53:53.353085Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @zimoun and @futurile, I think for it to be meaningful we need the total number of contributors too, not just those whose patches were accepted.  The number of unanswered tickets on issues.guix.gnu.org does not tell a happy story.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2k53O9AmzIMT0AQ8O by futurile@mastodon.social
       2026-01-28T10:11:40Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @cnx Yeah. The Survey data showed how many contributors we had and I manually went through 2 years of people sending patches and emailed each one to find out about their contribution experience. Let me just say that again - EVERY SINGLE contributor - and there were ~50 people who had stopped contributing who replied and gave their experiences.The details are all in the Survey write-up part 3 on the blog.