Post B2ejkXLPIf3gf6G90S by MeBigbrain@poa.st
(DIR) More posts by MeBigbrain@poa.st
(DIR) Post #B2eiM3wYrMluZaP6UC by WandererUber@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:21:56.402929Z
4 likes, 1 repeats
I wonder how this squares with women always enforcing normative behavior. supposedly. Everyone knows the old take about "only high test men aren't agreeable to a fault. Literally everyone else just does what the majority does and is judgemental when you don't follow"this research would imply the opposite. Could be some psych undergrad niggertard messed up the MRI math again (replication crisis is NOT solved)RT: https://shin.mugicha.club/objects/feaa0afd-523d-4989-b768-694758be26be
(DIR) Post #B2ejaxZ0xgzz5I3ckS by MeBigbrain@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:36:32.739328Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@WandererUber @Oughtism When you look inside, you see less enforcement of normative behavior and more just constant attempts to deescalate conflict. Women don't really enforce norms, that would require confrontation and also referencing old values. Instead, women avoid confrontation and only refer to the newest thing in terms of what is "normal," which means they're very susceptible to soft power.
(DIR) Post #B2ejerYLFgFjbHbVIW by WandererUber@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:37:18.347903Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MeBigbrain @Oughtism so you agree with me the two takes don't square
(DIR) Post #B2ejkXLPIf3gf6G90S by MeBigbrain@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:38:12.357766Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@WandererUber @Oughtism Basically, yes; I disagree with the take that women enforce normative behavior.
(DIR) Post #B2ejxsEExniNCMGb9U by WandererUber@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:40:44.750115Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MeBigbrain @Oughtism I'm not so sure if I am convinced of that though, because they will NOT avoid confrontation when they think they are in the majority. Not even when it's 1 on 1. Or so my non-Chud friends tell me. jokes aside you see them literally all the time either grandstanding in public about how something is shameful and wrong and you're not "being a hecking good person" or whatever, and also in private they will gossip about how "Mrs Watkins didn't go to church at all this month" etc (two examples also to say it's not about pol affiliation)
(DIR) Post #B2ekjZya84mUUNgrQ0 by MeBigbrain@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:49:21.117233Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@WandererUber @Oughtism Actually this puts into perspective a frustrating thing I've noticed about politics involving women (regardless of the issue): they are anti-conflict above nearly any other aspect of any argument. Any escalation to conflict immediately makes the person who escalated wrong in their eyes."But don't women often protest and even hit first?" you may ask. That's the stupid thing, they aren't anti-*violence* or being abrasive or causing trouble, they expect to be able to do all of their obnoxious cunt behavior *unopposed.* Their problem is when anyone else does anything about it. Which is why they see illegals as just living their lives while ICE are the aggressors for attempting to do something about the problems they cause. They are essentially against norm enforcement or problem solving that inconveniences absolutely anyone for any reason. This is why they try to frame everything in a way that they're the passive party while their enemies are the aggressors every single time, they don't care what causes the aggression or how justified it might be. Think back to when you were a kid and got in trouble for fighting and the teachers said shit like "I don't care who started it, fighting is wrong."
(DIR) Post #B2el929oUPNx8B570S by WandererUber@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:53:57.933424Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MeBigbrain @Oughtism but that IS the norm. Illegals just being tolerated because "borders are just made up" IS their norm.as is "no sex stuff in school" for conservative mom activists. They scream bloody murder at anyone who opposes the social order they're enforcing.Liberal women had no problem with the tranny escalating to conflict by shooting Kirk in the neck.and the kid trouble thing is also their norm. They have no problem antagonizing boys for violating the standard of "everyone must hug and hold hands at all times and never roughhouse"that's the part that doesn't track with the cheating thing. Because they have the same rules as the men in this case, yet here they supposedly don't enforce them. Yet they say kill all men/rapists/whatever and are very glad to see those "wrong-doers" punished
(DIR) Post #B2eljS9tIL6yCIU3cG by MeBigbrain@poa.st
2026-01-25T21:59:48.854962Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@WandererUber @Oughtism >"their norm"That's what I meant when I said they just enforce the newest thing: what you're describing isn't norms, it's everyone having different opinions. If they were norms there would be consensus and consistency, they wouldn't just change every year with the environment. When the phrase "the new normal" was coined it was because the idea of a new normal was controversial, normal is supposed to be a static bedrock and not something constantly shifting. We live in a time where normal just doesn't exist, they killed it and now they dress up normal's corpse to parade around when they want act like they possess some kind of legitimacy.
(DIR) Post #B2elsfDs5kZdJzjnay by WandererUber@poa.st
2026-01-25T22:02:12.780503Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@MeBigbrain @Oughtism Oh well in that case we're not talking about the same thing even. What I am saying is that take I referenced was also always dressed up in psychology and the trait there is Big 5 "agreeableness"It's not like I don't know about the rest of this situation. Polarization and all that. yeah.but still. How does "women are very confrontational about enforcing what they see as the moral good" square with "in a game where it is literally only about following a few rules, they get the rules explained, yet they don't care if someone cheats"
(DIR) Post #B2enQ4J1xCI2csdwLQ by MeBigbrain@poa.st
2026-01-25T22:19:27.187552Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@WandererUber @Oughtism Honestly it probably doesn't square, it's a lot of woman logic, but I will try to parse this out in man (reality) terms.>"women are very confrontational about enforcing what they see as the moral good"I was trying to say this, but I don't think they see what I called "obnoxious cunt behavior" as "conflict." Like when women hit men; that's not a fight to them, they think they can just do that and it's outrageous if the man ever hits back. I think they take this same approach to their protests; for them it's just a nice outing where they bring guns and get to run people over and interfere with law enforcement, the *real* monsters are the ICE agents who sometimes retaliate. It's not conflict to them until somebody hits back, it's just violence and on some level they accept violence.>"in a game where it is literally only about following a few rules, they get the rules explained, yet they don't care if someone cheats"Women don't care about rules, and the extent that they do is the same as the hitting example above: "cheating is fine until somebody gets hurt." They think the point of rules is to prevent people from getting harmed, not about causing justified harm (doesn't exist to them) or for punishing past harms or even just establishing a societal framework. So taking a murderer off the streets harms the murderer which means it's bad; the murder was a long time ago and also abstract to them, they can't care about the people who were hurt in the past or imagine prevented crimes in the future, they just care about the stuff they're seeing right in front of them with no further context. (Obviously not all women are this retarded, just the vast majority)